|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
|
May 10 2012, 09:00 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() 100% Zip fan ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2222 Joined: 23-January 06 From: Akron Member No.: 326 |
Dear American Soccer Haters: We Don't Need You Anymore (A Thank You Note)
An interesting article that's relevant to Akron as we've seen soccer's growth firsthand. What do you guys think? I coach a little league baseball team and have noticed that soccer participation in the Akron area greatly outnumbers baseball. Will these kids continue to support soccer? QUOTE In the vast landscape of American sports, soccer has still yet to make a significant impression. Frankly, soccer has always been treated as something of a sixth toe in the footprint of American sports, with many fans calling soccer—and anyone who has grown to love it—every name you can imagine.
Soccer is boring. Soccer is for sissies. There isn't enough scoring. Just last week, I did a radio interview and mentioned an estimated 650 million people would tune in to the Manchester Derby, a statistic beset by comments like, "Soccer is only for people who weren't good enough to play real football." (Sound familiar GP1?) Clearly, the commenter was right. Half the planet must be a bunch of sissies. The good thing for soccer fans in America is that FINALLY, we no longer need people like that to care. So thank you, haters. We actually don't need you anymore. "They can watch us in America every week! In two languages!" David Ramos/Getty Images It's true. Soccer fans who tried to convert general-interest American sports fans have been misguided for years. Forcing American sports fans to care about soccer cannot work from a fan level. It can only work from a TV executive level. We were misguided in our pleas, and now, finally, we've gotten to the point where we can stop, take a minute and realize how foolish we have been. The average American sports fan may not have been listening, but TV executives were. As the European seasons come to a close, the English Premier League has as much final-day intrigue as fans could wish. Not only is the EPL title still up for grabs, but so are two of the top four positions in the league table—to qualify for next year's Champions League—as well as the last remaining spot in the relegation zone. Survival Sunday. That's what Fox Soccer is calling this weekend's slate of matches, something it is taking very, very seriously. "More than a million Americans watched us beat Manchester United. On a Monday afternoon!" Michael Regan/Getty Images While ESPN2 will air Manchester City vs. Queens Park Rangers, the most important match of the weekend, Fox and its array of networks will carry every other match on live TV. It's unprecedented, and it's an American soccer fan's dream. (click the link above for more) -------------------- |
|
|
May 10 2012, 09:16 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Nonsensical Rambler ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2252 Joined: 9-July 07 From: Akron, OH Member No.: 2566 |
YAWN
They have sited youth numbers for years, why? Because parents have thought football too dangerous, or kids were too big to play Pee Wee. Participation dwindles as the kids reach their teenage years. And a million people watched Manchesters play each other, I bet a quick poll would show those million were mostly English natives and non US Americanized people. What's interesting about the article is that it supports what train enthusiasts and knitters have said for a long time "We don't need the haters to care, because there are 400 channels that lack programming and need something to show, so we can find a NICHE there" More people watched American Pickers then the Manchester match. BTW, love soccer, played it and football and baseball, and watch the Zips every chance I get, I just have had it with the soccer snobbery. -------------------- "At least we know what the hell we is...we's a ZIP!" - Butchie Washington
|
|
|
May 10 2012, 09:22 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() 100% Zip fan ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2222 Joined: 23-January 06 From: Akron Member No.: 326 |
YAWN They have sited youth numbers for years, why? Because parents have thought football too dangerous, or kids were too big to play Pee Wee. Participation dwindles as the kids reach their teenage years. And a million people watched Manchesters play each other, I bet a quick poll would show those million were mostly English natives and non US Americanized people. What's interesting about the article is that it supports what train enthusiasts and knitters have said for a long time "We don't need the haters to care, because there are 400 channels that lack programming and need something to show, so we can find a NICHE there" More people watched American Pickers then the Manchester match. BTW, love soccer, played it and football and baseball, and watch the Zips every chance I get, I just have had it with the soccer snobbery. I'm a big MLS supporter and have watched every game highlight this year for every game. The MLS is doing very well this year. I've started to pay attention to NASL and USL Pro matches and have noticed that both of those leagues are doing very well this year. The article isn't trying to say soccer is going to takeover American sports, it's basically saying soccer is here to stay. -------------------- |
|
|
May 10 2012, 09:55 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Zips Junkie ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4881 Joined: 17-November 06 Member No.: 722 |
An interesting article that's relevant to Akron as we've seen soccer's growth firsthand. What do you guys think? I coach a little league baseball team and have noticed that soccer participation in the Akron area greatly outnumbers baseball. What a revelation. Tons of youths play soccer? We've known that for decades. It's inexpensive for parents, and great physical fitness for their kids, and I've pointed this out on many occassions. |
|
|
May 10 2012, 11:33 AM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() 100% Zip fan ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2222 Joined: 23-January 06 From: Akron Member No.: 326 |
What a revelation. Tons of youths play soccer? We've known that for decades. It's inexpensive for parents, and great physical fitness for their kids, and I've pointed this out on many occassions. Children look up to pro-athletes. I didn't know anything about professional soccer in my youth because it wasn't easy to access. The MLS is very easy to access and follow these days which could be the difference. Times have changed. Edit: Barcelona and Real Madrid are very easy to access these days. Most of these youth soccer participants know who Messi and Ronaldo are. I had no idea who Pele was when I played soccer. -------------------- |
|
|
May 10 2012, 12:20 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Zips Junkie ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 551 Joined: 29-December 10 From: Akron Member No.: 5821 |
Children look up to pro-athletes. I didn't know anything about professional soccer in my youth because it wasn't easy to access. The MLS is very easy to access and follow these days which could be the difference. Times have changed. Edit: Barcelona and Real Madrid are very easy to access these days. Most of these youth soccer participants know who Messi and Ronaldo are. I had no idea who Pele was when I played soccer. Really, I knew who Pele was in my youth soccer days and I have a few years on you bobbyake. It probably helped that my father would bring home Pele instructional VHS videos for me to watch. My soccer skills didn't follow the same route as Pele. Soccer is more accessible today. Over 15 years ago, the only soccer you could watch was the Mexican league on Sunday afternoons on Univision. And there would be no coverage of soccer except when the '94 World Cup happened. Even then, not all the WC games were televised or in '98. It wasn't until 2006 you could catch every WC match on the tube. It took baby steps to get where it is today. |
|
|
May 10 2012, 01:23 PM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() 100% Zip fan ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2222 Joined: 23-January 06 From: Akron Member No.: 326 |
Really, I knew who Pele was in my youth soccer days and I have a few years on you bobbyake. It probably helped that my father would bring home Pele instructional VHS videos for me to watch. My soccer skills didn't follow the same route as Pele. Soccer is more accessible today. Over 15 years ago, the only soccer you could watch was the Mexican league on Sunday afternoons on Univision. And there would be no coverage of soccer except when the '94 World Cup happened. Even then, not all the WC games were televised or in '98. It wasn't until 2006 you could catch every WC match on the tube. It took baby steps to get where it is today. You could argue that the lack of access of professional soccer was a reason why soccer's growth was slow during the 70's, 80's and 90's. This could also be the reason why a lot of youth's during those times grew away from the sport. Professional soccer is easily accessible today, which could be the reason why a lot of youth's are continuing to support it. ![]() We (soccer fans) are very happy with our soccer coverage. ESPN Sportscenter is for old people looking for old news. The MLS provides all the highlights I need within 5-10 minutes of it happening. Soccer haters have lost their battle with killing soccer in America. -------------------- |
|
|
May 10 2012, 01:29 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Zips Junkie ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4881 Joined: 17-November 06 Member No.: 722 |
Children look up to pro-athletes. I didn't know anything about professional soccer in my youth because it wasn't easy to access. The MLS is very easy to access and follow these days which could be the difference. Times have changed. Edit: Barcelona and Real Madrid are very easy to access these days. Most of these youth soccer participants know who Messi and Ronaldo are. I had no idea who Pele was when I played soccer. So, in response to my post, you are saying that times have changed, pro soccer is easily assessible now, and that youth soccer is huge because these kids look up to pro soccer players? Then why has youth soccer been so big for decades now? Why are soccer fanatics so emphatic in their denial as to why so many little kids play soccer? It's a game that is able to be played by kids with little or no instruction. You can throw the ball out there and simply tell them to kick it in the net. There's no equipment. You don't need a big financial commitment as a parent. The reasons are pretty simple. |
|
|
May 10 2012, 01:52 PM
Post
#9
|
|
![]() 100% Zip fan ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2222 Joined: 23-January 06 From: Akron Member No.: 326 |
So, in response to my post, you are saying that times have changed, pro soccer is easily assessible now, and that youth soccer is huge because these kids look up to pro soccer players? I did say that pro soccer is easily accessible today, but did not say that's the reason for youth's strong participation numbers. What I am saying is that pro soccer's easy access to these youths could be the reason why these youth's continue to support soccer. I made the argument above that pro soccer's lack of access could be a major reason why a lot of youth's during the 70's, 80's, and 90's moved away from the sport. It's hard to support a sport no one knows about. Then why has youth soccer been so big for decades now? Why are soccer fanatics so emphatic in their denial as to why so many little kids play soccer? It's a game that is able to be played by kids with little or no instruction. You can throw the ball out there and simply tell them to kick it in the net. There's no equipment. You don't need a big financial commitment as a parent. The reasons are pretty simple. examples of this denial please? I don't believe soccer fans deny why kids play soccer.-------------------- |
|
|
May 10 2012, 04:02 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Zips Junkie ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4881 Joined: 17-November 06 Member No.: 722 |
I did say that pro soccer is easily accessible today, but did not say that's the reason for youth's strong participation numbers. What I am saying is that pro soccer's easy access to these youths could be the reason why these youth's continue to support soccer. I made the argument above that pro soccer's lack of access could be a major reason why a lot of youth's during the 70's, 80's, and 90's moved away from the sport. It's hard to support a sport no one knows about. examples of this denial please? I don't believe soccer fans deny why kids play soccer. First of all, a lot of kids have always played soccer, for the very simple reasons I have mentioned. Where is this sudden breakout of participation by youths? And how is that somehow linked to kids idolzing pro soccer players when pro soccer is not even popular in the US ? |
|
|
May 10 2012, 04:52 PM
Post
#11
|
|
![]() 100% Zip fan ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2222 Joined: 23-January 06 From: Akron Member No.: 326 |
First of all, a lot of kids have always played soccer, for the very simple reasons I have mentioned. Where is this sudden breakout of participation by youths? And how is that somehow linked to kids idolzing pro soccer players when pro soccer is not even popular in the US ? I mentioned soccer participation as an observation. Im confused by your questions. Pro soccer is the 2nd most popular sport for the high school and college age according to ESPN. Re-reading this thread might answer questions you have. -------------------- |
|
|
May 10 2012, 05:15 PM
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Zips Junkie ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1484 Joined: 10-January 10 From: Ashland, Ohio Member No.: 5468 |
The discussions between soccer fans and non-fans remind me of discussions between believers and atheists. All 4 groups know they are right and nothing is going to change their beliefs.
-------------------- |
|
|
May 10 2012, 05:54 PM
Post
#13
|
|
![]() 100% Zip fan ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2222 Joined: 23-January 06 From: Akron Member No.: 326 |
I don't understand why non-soccer fans are always up in arms when soccer fans mention soccer growth information and trends. A lot of US soccer fans support football, baseball, and basketball.
-------------------- |
|
|
May 10 2012, 08:34 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Zips Junkie ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5512 Joined: 5-December 04 From: Green, Ohio Member No.: 120 |
@bobbyake, I'm primarily interested in basketball. While I don't have a lot of interest in soccer beyond the Zips, I do appreciate reading stats like those you presented. I don't see anything unreasonable in any of your comments. The world is constantly changing, and the smaller the world gets, the faster it can change. I recently read an interesting article about how basketball is the fastest growing sport in China. Who knows what's going to be the most popular sport in any country 50-100 years from now? All we can do is look at stats and trends and try to estimate where things are going. Makes for interesting conversation.
|
|
|
May 11 2012, 07:22 AM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Zips Junkie ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1362 Joined: 8-November 07 Member No.: 4828 |
I don't understand why non-soccer fans are always up in arms when soccer fans mention soccer growth information and trends. A lot of US soccer fans support football, baseball, and basketball. Maybe because people get a little obnoxious and start topics titles "American soccer haters: We don't need you" |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 12:32 PM |