psc2009 Posted September 22, 2009 Report Posted September 22, 2009 This set of rankings has Akron way down at No. 9. That seems low, but the Zips have only beaten a bad I-AA team. Is this fair? Would it be higher with Jacquemain?http://themacdaily.com/index.php?p=1_106 Quote
johnnyzip84 Posted September 22, 2009 Report Posted September 22, 2009 This set of rankings has Akron way down at No. 9. That seems low, but the Zips have only beaten a bad I-AA team. Is this fair? Would it be higher with Jacquemain?http://themacdaily.com/index.php?p=1_106I can't argue with it at this point. Time will tell. I don't think having Jacq would effect it more than one or two places. Quote
g-mann17 Posted September 23, 2009 Report Posted September 23, 2009 Well I would argue that Ohio beat Cal Poly (really?) and a very bad North Texas. EMU is 0-3 and just lost Schmit for the season. Quote
johnnyzip84 Posted September 23, 2009 Report Posted September 23, 2009 Well I would argue that Ohio beat Cal Poly (really?) and a very bad North Texas. EMU is 0-3 and just lost Schmit for the season.We'll find out in a little over 2 weeks whether the Zips are better then the Bob-kitties. But let's not kid ourselves. Both North Texas and Cal Poly would waltz over Morgan St. Quote
skip-zip Posted September 23, 2009 Report Posted September 23, 2009 This set of rankings has Akron way down at No. 9. That seems low, but the Zips have only beaten a bad I-AA team. Is this fair? Would it be higher with Jacquemain?http://themacdaily.com/index.php?p=1_106Well...I think possibly the game wouldn't have gotten so out of hand with a more experienced QB in there last week. So, I think that would have ranked us higher. But the real question is...how fast are we going to recover from losing him. Hopefully, soon enough to salvage the season. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.