UADavid Posted August 31, 2006 Report Posted August 31, 2006 MAC favored over SunBelt and CUSA.http://www.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/powergrid/ Quote
liljc Posted August 31, 2006 Report Posted August 31, 2006 Sun Belt and CUSA, today. The Big East and WAC, tomorrow. Quote
ziptrumpet87 Posted August 31, 2006 Report Posted August 31, 2006 only if we ditch Can't and buffalo Quote
Zips fan Posted August 31, 2006 Report Posted August 31, 2006 If I was ranking the conferences:1) SEC-deep and lots of quality2) B10-numerous teams that could be top 253) B12-Strong in the South-the North division is catching up4) ACC-Good top teams but lacks some depth5) PAC10-Great front runnersbig gap6) Big East-2 team race with several non-BCS team along for the ride7) Mountain West-TCU, Utah, BYU the conference is strong and could see TCU break into the BCS gamegap8) WAC-Boise, Fresno and Nevada are strong programs but they have problems at the bottom9) MAC-Lots of decent programs with no true stars this year. Going into the season some people have been dumb enough to pick bottom feeder Can't. 10) C-USA-UTEP, Tulsa are strong but they have numerous bottom feeder as wellgap11) Sun Belt-not competitive with the other programs at this point. The top team is barely ranked in the top 100.The MAC, WAC and C-USA are battling for some national respect. A successful OOC season will go along way in helping us catch up to the Mountain West and Big East. They are aways ahead of us currently, we need some big wins! Let go MAC!!! Quote
UADavid Posted September 7, 2006 Author Report Posted September 7, 2006 http://www.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/powergrid/Updated power rankings by conference. We didn't win any marquee matchups, but it says we're closing in on Mountain West. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.