Jump to content

I just received an email back from...


timmyboy

Recommended Posts

If you want to see the MAC look like a joke to the whole entire world then they would have called a T on Miami. That would make the MAC, the officials, the city of Cleveland and anyone who went to a MAC member school look like an absolute joke. So if you want to be embarrassed on national TV then the MAC should have called a technical foul. I would not accept winning that way, maybe you guys would, but I would not accept winning like that. It's one thing to bank in a shot, but another for someone to hand you 2 foul shots and possesion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Indians06: If you watch the replay, Penno did not shoot the ball when he first caught it because he did not have a clean look(Dials running at him and jumping up), he ball faked, step left and shot. If the clock had started when it should have, he does not have time for the ball fake and DOES NOT GET A CLEAN LOOK!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His bio mentions Ohio State's 1999 Final Four appearance.  Weren't they stripped of that?  Should that be mentioned in an official bio considering that they were stripped of it?  tOSU can't mention it; why can Boyages?
They wern't stripped of it. There were no recruiting violations done with that team. The only hting they got O'brien on was giving money to a recruit that did not come to Ohio State. The final 4 appereance is leit, and is still celebrated
Not according to any source I can find. The NCAA required tOSU to remove any reference to that Final Four appearance, including removing the banner. Fans can still celebrate it, but their appearance was stricken from the records. Technically, they never played in the Final Four that year. And btw, if saying the conference is a joke is ignorant then I want to be ignorant too. :D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can someone please verify that these rules were violated?Page BR-157. Rule 10, Section 3, Article 4.Page BR-158. Rule 10, Section 3, Article 9a.Page BR-165. Rule 10, Section 9, Article 7.Page BR-167. Rule 10, Section 11, Article 2.Page BR-167. Rule 10, Section 11, Article 3.http://www.ncaa.org/library/rules/2007/200...tball_rules.pdf
Page BR-157. Rule 10, Section 3, Article 4. - No. Time had expired before they came onto the court.Page BR-158. Rule 10, Section 3, Article 9a. - No. Not sure what you are inferring, but if you are talking about subs before the 0.6 was played, the ball was dead and both teams can sub.Page BR-165. Rule 10, Section 9, Article 7. - No. Who was injured?Page BR-167. Rule 10, Section 11, Article 2. No. Time had expired.Page BR-167. Rule 10, Section 11, Article 3. - No. Time had expired.What's our point here? Glad you found the rule book though. Now read it! :rolleyes:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...