Indians06 Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 If you want to see the MAC look like a joke to the whole entire world then they would have called a T on Miami. That would make the MAC, the officials, the city of Cleveland and anyone who went to a MAC member school look like an absolute joke. So if you want to be embarrassed on national TV then the MAC should have called a technical foul. I would not accept winning that way, maybe you guys would, but I would not accept winning like that. It's one thing to bank in a shot, but another for someone to hand you 2 foul shots and possesion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zip81 Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 Let's drop the conversation about the T.It's really petty and not worth the effort or conversation...in my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigzipguy Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 Indians06: If you watch the replay, Penno did not shoot the ball when he first caught it because he did not have a clean look(Dials running at him and jumping up), he ball faked, step left and shot. If the clock had started when it should have, he does not have time for the ball fake and DOES NOT GET A CLEAN LOOK!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KNCLZip Posted March 13, 2007 Report Share Posted March 13, 2007 His bio mentions Ohio State's 1999 Final Four appearance. Weren't they stripped of that? Should that be mentioned in an official bio considering that they were stripped of it? tOSU can't mention it; why can Boyages?They wern't stripped of it. There were no recruiting violations done with that team. The only hting they got O'brien on was giving money to a recruit that did not come to Ohio State. The final 4 appereance is leit, and is still celebrated Not according to any source I can find. The NCAA required tOSU to remove any reference to that Final Four appearance, including removing the banner. Fans can still celebrate it, but their appearance was stricken from the records. Technically, they never played in the Final Four that year. And btw, if saying the conference is a joke is ignorant then I want to be ignorant too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
74ZIP Posted March 13, 2007 Report Share Posted March 13, 2007 among other mistakes the ZIPS made during the game if they had STOPPED THE BALL in the backcourt...thats B.Ball 101 gang!...JR HIGH stuff...stop the damn ball!...stop whining...it never should have come down to the freethrows OR "THE SHOT" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FearTheRoo Posted March 13, 2007 Report Share Posted March 13, 2007 Can someone please verify that these rules were violated?Page BR-157. Rule 10, Section 3, Article 4.Page BR-158. Rule 10, Section 3, Article 9a.Page BR-165. Rule 10, Section 9, Article 7.Page BR-167. Rule 10, Section 11, Article 2.Page BR-167. Rule 10, Section 11, Article 3.http://www.ncaa.org/library/rules/2007/200...tball_rules.pdfPage BR-157. Rule 10, Section 3, Article 4. - No. Time had expired before they came onto the court.Page BR-158. Rule 10, Section 3, Article 9a. - No. Not sure what you are inferring, but if you are talking about subs before the 0.6 was played, the ball was dead and both teams can sub.Page BR-165. Rule 10, Section 9, Article 7. - No. Who was injured?Page BR-167. Rule 10, Section 11, Article 2. No. Time had expired.Page BR-167. Rule 10, Section 11, Article 3. - No. Time had expired.What's our point here? Glad you found the rule book though. Now read it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.