Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/06/2014 in Posts

  1. UCLA had 5 players on the WC roster in 2006 and 1994 http://forums.bigsoccer.com/threads/college-soccer-and-the-2014-wc-team.2005122/
    1 point
  2. Student attendence won't be improving so long as we continue the current scheduling philosophy of a million cupcake home games. Not only are the opponents unexciting, the games are boring, and there are too many of them to the whole experience gets cheapened. And the excuse of trying to protect a young team is crap. This team is not young. We're returning all but two players and many of them have multiple years of post-season experience.
    1 point
  3. I guess my question would be...Is he getting a scholarship? If not, there is no harm in bringing him here. The scout team needs players too. Actually, to say there is no harm may not be true either. Nobody will be around 24 hours a day to babysit this guy and he has shown an ability to get in trouble. There is some level of risk here for others around him getting in trouble. If he is getting a scholarship, it is a risk. The guy got kicked out of one school for criminal activity and transfered out of AU shortly after being named starting QB to bet on the come at Akron. Something doesn't smell right with this guy.
    1 point
  4. Individually and collectively, the 2013-14 academic year was among the best ever for our student-athletes at The University of Akron. View the full article at www.GoZips.com
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...