Jump to content

Razor Video Report from Camp


johnnyzip84

Recommended Posts

This is starting to remind me of the times when I would call in to ask questions of Gerry Faust on "the CAT" with Joe Dunn (I believe) handling the calls. I didn't receive channels 29 or 35 on my cable package back then, so I would be fooling around with a UHF antenna, phone in my other hand, trying to peak through the snow on the TV while listening to Gerry try to explain why we didn't have Marcel Weems throw the ball more when Can't had 9 defenders on the line of scrimmage on every play during the flushes upset of the Zips at Dix Stadium one year :lol: Back to subject, I'd like for Razor to ask JD if he is considering playing both Jacq and Rodgers the 1st game only vs Wisconsin. Not that I want a 2-headed beast again, because I don't. I just think it might make for a good opportunity to see what Matt has to offer "under fire". After the Badgers, I'd go with the guy who played best in that game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i find it very interesting that jd hasn't committed to jac yet. every time he's asked a question about jac he always mentions rodgers. it appears that rodgers has more talent but lacks experience. it's a tough call as once you give rodgers the keys there's no turning back. i'll still stick with my prediction that he'll be under center for the cuse game :screwks:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i find it very interesting that jd hasn't committed to jac yet. every time he's asked a question about jac he always mentions rodgers. it appears that rodgers has more talent but lacks experience. it's a tough call as once you give rodgers the keys there's no turning back. i'll still stick with my prediction that he'll be under center for the cuse game :screwks:
Here's what might be going on. Could it be that CJ11 is truely better than MR right now, but MR might be progressing faster than CJ11? If JD rules out MR right now, MR might bolt, and we're stuck with CJ11. I wouldn't be suprised to see us rotate MR in for a few games to keep both of them hooked until one comes out the clear winner.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i find it very interesting that jd hasn't committed to jac yet. every time he's asked a question about jac he always mentions rodgers. it appears that rodgers has more talent but lacks experience. it's a tough call as once you give rodgers the keys there's no turning back. i'll still stick with my prediction that he'll be under center for the cuse game :screwks:
Here's what might be going on. Could it be that CJ11 is truely better than MR right now, but MR might be progressing faster than CJ11? If JD rules out MR right now, MR might bolt, and we're stuck with CJ11. I wouldn't be suprised to see us rotate MR in for a few games to keep both of them hooked until one comes out the clear winner.
What we really need is a blowout win or two, to allow them both to see the field. That's not too likely, however.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

it appears that rodgers has more talent but lacks experience.
I agree with you 19. I would guess CJ to start, but CJ's play will determine how quick we see Rodgers. If his play is great, we hold off on Rodgers, if his play is sub par, well, we will see Rodgers. Isn't that the competition scenario that you try to create as a coach this time of year?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...