Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I would think that we would have at least one also. If there are approximately 130 D-1A teams in the country and each has 22 starters (130 x 22 = 2,860) Kiki and Luke would only be .07% of the list. Surely one of them deserves to be on the list.

Posted

Collegefootballnews did not ranks us well either. I think some of these rankings are to spark interest in the BCS fanbase. Is Kiki and Luke top 200? Absolutely! Does collegefootballnews want to be accurate or get their name out their for having theoretically credibility with BCS schools? This gives fuel for some idiot in Columbus to say how many top 200 players they have this year.

Posted

Zips Fan,I agree. CFN consistantly overrates the BCS team and underrates everyone else. I think if we went 11-1 they would only have us rated in the 30's, but if a high-profile team did the same, they would be in the top 10 without a question. :gun::chair:

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...