RowdyZip Posted February 25, 2007 Report Share Posted February 25, 2007 [*]Why weren't the AK-Rowdies allowed to storm the court? I think we are one of only a few schools who don't allow it. It's not "allowed" anywhere. In fact, the NCAA hands out fines for it if you look it up. Besides, this was hardly an appropriate game to "storm the court." We beat a last place team by 6 points! COME ON! Storm the court when...?The Zips defeat a top 25 team at home (this would've been the case vs Nevada) YES!!!!The Zips beat the 2nd place team in the MAC East. NO!!!!The Zips beat the last place team in the league, senior night or not. NOOO!!!!!!The Zips beat Can't State either handily or on a last second shot...MAYBE!!!The Zips beat Can't State to win the MAC Championship. YES!!!The Zips beat ANY TEAM to win the MAC Championship. YESSSSSSS!!!!Use this as a guide in the future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachTheZip Posted February 25, 2007 Report Share Posted February 25, 2007 [*]Why weren't the AK-Rowdies allowed to storm the court? I think we are one of only a few schools who don't allow it. It's not "allowed" anywhere. In fact, the NCAA hands out fines for it if you look it up. Besides, this was hardly an appropriate game to "storm the court." We beat a last place team by 6 points! COME ON! Storm the court when...?The Zips defeat a top 25 team at home (this would've been the case vs Nevada) YES!!!!The Zips beat the 2nd place team in the MAC East. NO!!!!The Zips beat the last place team in the league, senior night or not. NOOO!!!!!!The Zips beat Can't State either handily or on a last second shot...MAYBE!!!The Zips beat Can't State to win the MAC Championship. YES!!!The Zips beat ANY TEAM to win the MAC Championship. YESSSSSSS!!!!Use this as a guide in the future. I wanted to storm the court because this was Rome and Dru's last game at the JAR. They deserved to be surrounded by fans celebrating 4 years of being awesome. They earned it. I wasn't the only one thinking that, either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quickzips Posted February 25, 2007 Report Share Posted February 25, 2007 Some thoughts:-Very nice crowd tonight and for once most of them seemed to be into it most of the game. We need more of that. MUCH more.-Fitting ends to Romeo and Dru's careers in the JAR. Dru takes the alltime assist lead in front of the home fans and has solid performance and Romeo puts up his best night ever (at least offensively) with 37. -Romeo was a man possessed inside. Every time he got the ball he started backing his man in and there was nothing any of BG's guys could do to stop him. I wish we had seen more performances like this over the years from him. There would be no doubt about where he would stand in school history.-I'm really glad the foul shooting got at least a little better in the second half. I would have hated to be in that lockerroom at halftime. I know we struggle at the line and I've accepted this, but that first half was just totally unacceptable. Especially guys like Dru and Ced who are supposed to nail those in their sleep. Heck for a while it was looking like Wood was our best foul shooter.-The North side Rowdies don't deserve the seats they sit in. On the south side we are up and into the game all the time. North side looks more like the alumni most games. I thought we had a rule that you stand up and be loud all game long or you get booted? -Listening to the postgame it sounded like KD wants to get the bench some more minutes at Duquesne and rest the starters a bit, but he isn't going to sacrifice the game to do so. Can't say I disagree with him, but I hope we get out to a nice comfortable lead and have the luxury of giving McKnight, Conyers, Goddard, Sallee and <gulp> even Rybak some more minutes.-Final thought: Its nice to pull down a W when you don't have your best night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apollo Creed Posted February 25, 2007 Report Share Posted February 25, 2007 Holy 37 points. You sure it was Romeo, and not LeBron?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FearTheRoo Posted February 25, 2007 Report Share Posted February 25, 2007 Holy 37 points. You sure it was Romeo, and not LeBron?? Oh, you are not right! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgm405 Posted February 25, 2007 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2007 The North side Rowdies don't deserve the seats they sit in. On the south side we are up and into the game all the time. North side looks more like the alumni most games. I thought we had a rule that you stand up and be loud all game long or you get booted?Half of the people sitting in the North side weren't "Rowdies". They were students who just wanted to sit down low. Yes, a few sat down for awhile until a few of us reminded them to stand up. And yes, they might not have been as into the game as I would have hoped that they'd be. But do you honestly want to kick them out of their seats? You want half-empty student sections to become a regular thing? I have said this about eight times tonight...WE CANNOT BE PICKY ABOUT WHO SITS LOW. For whatever reason (a whole other debate) the students haven't been showing up to sit down low. So until they do, you have one of two choices:1) Let anyone sit down low - regardless of what they're wearing, how many games they've been to, how crazy they get, etc. - and have almost-full to full student sections, and in the process hope to gain non-Rowdies interest in the student section and in turn build the fan base2) Kick them out of their seats or not let them sit down low at all unless they do every single thing our best fans do. Continue having half-empty student sections and never allow growth in the group. I know what I'd pick. Not everyone is going to paint their body/face, or stick pom poms in their socks, and/or go absolutely nuts every single minute of every single game. I think it's great that so many in the South Side show that enthusiasm, and believe there is a great set of fans over there. But at the same time, that doesn't mean the North Siders aren't doing a great job either, or that they're any less of fans. And by continually bad-mouthing the North Section, it really does nothing but create tension. Let's not forget...we're all students, we're all fans, and many of us are Rowdies. The point is to get more of us, even if we do have to go through some growing pains...not push current ones away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quickzips Posted February 25, 2007 Report Share Posted February 25, 2007 The North side Rowdies don't deserve the seats they sit in. On the south side we are up and into the game all the time. North side looks more like the alumni most games. I thought we had a rule that you stand up and be loud all game long or you get booted?Half of the people sitting in the North side weren't "Rowdies". They were students who just wanted to sit down low. Yes, a few sat down for awhile until a few of us reminded them to stand up. And yes, they might not have been as into the game as I would have hoped that they'd be. But do you honestly want to kick them out of their seats? You want half-empty student sections to become a regular thing? I have said this about eight times tonight...WE CANNOT BE PICKY ABOUT WHO SITS LOW. For whatever reason (a whole other debate) the students haven't been showing up to sit down low. So until they do, you have one of two choices:1) Let anyone sit down low - regardless of what they're wearing, how many games they've been to, how crazy they get, etc. - and have almost-full to full student sections, and in the process hope to gain non-Rowdies interest in the student section and in turn build the fan base2) Kick them out of their seats or not let them sit down low at all unless they do every single thing our best fans do. Continue having half-empty student sections and never allow growth in the group. I know what I'd pick. Not everyone is going to paint their body/face, or stick pom poms in their socks, and/or go absolutely nuts every single minute of every single game. I think it's great that so many in the South Side show that enthusiasm, and believe there is a great set of fans over there. But at the same time, that doesn't mean the North Siders aren't doing a great job either, or that they're any less of fans. And by continually bad-mouthing the North Section, it really does nothing but create tension. Let's not forget...we're all students, we're all fans, and many of us are Rowdies. The point is to get more of us, even if we do have to go through some growing pains...not push current ones away. With 5200 people there last night, and a good contingent of student, praticularly greeks I would like to see the powers that be be a little more choosy on who is sitting down there. The people who were down there looked to me like a lot of the same group of stiffs that they usually get to fill up that side of the student section. And sorry, they NEVER stand up. They might have been on their feet for a grand total of 8-10 minutes last night and even that may have been giving them too much credit. We may not have been able to do much better most of the season in terms of "seat fillers" but last night we certainly could have. It would have been real nice last night to instead of filling those seats with the same stiffs bring down some of the greeks who, I would assume, would have more enthusiasm for the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgm405 Posted February 25, 2007 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2007 The North side Rowdies don't deserve the seats they sit in. On the south side we are up and into the game all the time. North side looks more like the alumni most games. I thought we had a rule that you stand up and be loud all game long or you get booted?Half of the people sitting in the North side weren't "Rowdies". They were students who just wanted to sit down low. Yes, a few sat down for awhile until a few of us reminded them to stand up. And yes, they might not have been as into the game as I would have hoped that they'd be. But do you honestly want to kick them out of their seats? You want half-empty student sections to become a regular thing? I have said this about eight times tonight...WE CANNOT BE PICKY ABOUT WHO SITS LOW. For whatever reason (a whole other debate) the students haven't been showing up to sit down low. So until they do, you have one of two choices:1) Let anyone sit down low - regardless of what they're wearing, how many games they've been to, how crazy they get, etc. - and have almost-full to full student sections, and in the process hope to gain non-Rowdies interest in the student section and in turn build the fan base2) Kick them out of their seats or not let them sit down low at all unless they do every single thing our best fans do. Continue having half-empty student sections and never allow growth in the group. I know what I'd pick. Not everyone is going to paint their body/face, or stick pom poms in their socks, and/or go absolutely nuts every single minute of every single game. I think it's great that so many in the South Side show that enthusiasm, and believe there is a great set of fans over there. But at the same time, that doesn't mean the North Siders aren't doing a great job either, or that they're any less of fans. And by continually bad-mouthing the North Section, it really does nothing but create tension. Let's not forget...we're all students, we're all fans, and many of us are Rowdies. The point is to get more of us, even if we do have to go through some growing pains...not push current ones away. With 5200 people there last night, and a good contingent of student, praticularly greeks I would like to see the powers that be be a little more choosy on who is sitting down there. The people who were down there looked to me like a lot of the same group of stiffs that they usually get to fill up that side of the student section. And sorry, they NEVER stand up. They might have been on their feet for a grand total of 8-10 minutes last night and even that may have been giving them too much credit. We may not have been able to do much better most of the season in terms of "seat fillers" but last night we certainly could have. It would have been real nice last night to instead of filling those seats with the same stiffs bring down some of the greeks who, I would assume, would have more enthusiasm for the game. And why do you assume that? Maybe we could've set up a screening process... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.