Slightly different twist - same conclusion.
EA's article (out of thin air we are suppose to believe since NO ONE is writing about MAC basketball) is a response to the legitiimate concerns brought to the attention of the PD ( at the encouragement of the Zip Nation, among others,) after EA's previous discraceful hatchet job on KD.
Appears to be an attempt to respond to the concerns of his editor, while at the same time trying to retain a semblance of cojones. As naive as this may sound, I would be surprised and disappointed if he alludes to the incident again anytime soon, but hell it wouldn't be the first time I was naive, surprised and disapointed.
One thing is obvious, EA is a fequent guest of the board because this most recent article is little more than am amalgam of plagiarized post from this board leading up to the REASSIGNMENT of DH and the hiring of KD.
THE PEN IS NOT MIGHTIER THAN THE BOARD.
DEFENSE DEFENSE DEFENSE DEFENSE DEFENSE DEFENSE DEFENSE DEFENSE DEFENSE
IN MT I TRUST
IN MT I TRUST
IN MT I TRUST