of the thirty or so responses on that blog, i saw one person grade amato as being worse than our previous coach. and of course the fans were mad after the game. we had just lost, and at home too. as for a grading, d+ would be fair for how we've started the season. overall, i would give chuck amato a b-. we've gone bowling 5 of his 6 seasons here. he's put something like 22 players into the nfl while at state. the fanbase is fired up about football, something none of our other coaches have been able to do. you can say that amato's been able to brainwash the fanbase into believe that we're a football school too, and not just a basketball school. the only other time our national profile in football was this high might have been when lou holtz coached here (better than .700 record; wins over bigtime powerhouse programs at the time; a #3 finish).just to shed some light for you; going in reverse:mike o'cain - couldn't beat our rivals, especially carolina. he did beat florida state though. he also only managed a .500 overall record. o'cain was fired and became the offensive coordinator for clemson, and is now at va tech.dick sheriden - wonderful coach. if he had the financial support that amato has now, and the $160 million or so in stadium upgrads, and the fervor of the fanbase... man.tom reed - 3 season in the mid-80's. 3-8 finish in each of those. 'nuff said.