UA Fan Posted December 9, 2009 Report Posted December 9, 2009 http://www.sportingnews.com/college-basket...g-hoops-tourney Quote
ZachTheZip Posted December 9, 2009 Report Posted December 9, 2009 The only reason they would do this would be to get those borderline BCS teams in the dance. Don't expect any more bids for the other conferences than what we get now. Quote
UA Fan Posted December 9, 2009 Author Report Posted December 9, 2009 It would be 30 additional teams...would have to include some mid-majors. We could actually get an at-large bid. Quote
Captain Kangaroo Posted December 9, 2009 Report Posted December 9, 2009 It would be 30 additional teams...would have to include some mid-majors. We could actually get an at-large bid.Not unless we scheduled better, and quit losing our "measuring stick" games.We WOULD have a better chance of winning more than 1 game in the NIT, however. Quote
skip-zip Posted December 9, 2009 Report Posted December 9, 2009 It would be 30 additional teams...would have to include some mid-majors. We could actually get an at-large bid.Not unless we scheduled better, and quit losing our "measuring stick" games.We WOULD have a better chance of winning more than 1 game in the NIT, however.I hear that.I hope we haven't forgotten that 26 wins didn't get us into the top 96 tournament spots just a few years ago. So, I wouldn't count on anything just because the tourney field is 30 teams larger unless we upgrade our SOS, and stop having poor performances that stick out like a sore thumb (Austin Peay, UAPB) when the selection committee looks over our resume. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.