jem101 Posted October 19, 2011 Report Posted October 19, 2011 Doing a bit of quick research, it looks like it all depends on if you view Yedlin's pass is a controlled one. If it was a controlled pass, then he's not off. If it isn't a controlled pass, then the he is off. Obviously, this wasn't a controlled pass.The ref deemed it to be a controlled pass obviously.Haha, very true. Shouldn't have let a refs call make that big of a difference when we should be the superior side. Quote
bisbee Posted October 19, 2011 Report Posted October 19, 2011 The lack of any sort of consistent finishing is biting us in the ass Quote
schiri Posted October 19, 2011 Report Posted October 19, 2011 Doing a bit of quick research, it looks like it all depends on if you view Yedlin's pass is a controlled one. If it was a controlled pass, then he's not off. If it isn't a controlled pass, then the he is off. Obviously, this wasn't a controlled pass.He should have cleared the ball with his left foot, eliminating any issues. However, after speaking with him, the ball actually redirected off the foot of the Michigan player after he touched it. It should have been offside. Regardless, it took an outrageous finish to score.If, in fact, Yedlin's play on the ball did direct off the MU attacker then you are correct. It would have been OS.The ref was no more than 10 yards from the play though.http://www.mgoblue.com/sports/m-soccer/mic...occer-body.html Quote
Ando Posted October 19, 2011 Report Posted October 19, 2011 Yeah I'm inclined to believe the linesman just blew the call. Not gonna get salty about it, though, because this is a team we should have beaten in the first 90, and we didn't deserve it. Quote
TheTank123 Posted October 19, 2011 Report Posted October 19, 2011 Yeah I'm inclined to believe the linesman just blew the call. Not gonna get salty about it, though, because this is a team we should have beaten in the first 90, and we didn't deserve it.Yup. Quote
RootforRoo44 Posted October 19, 2011 Report Posted October 19, 2011 Yeah I'm inclined to believe the linesman just blew the call. Not gonna get salty about it, though, because this is a team we should have beaten in the first 90, and we didn't deserve it.+1No matter how big of a shafting it was, we still should have wooped Michigan. The crappy field conditions didn't help but STILL shouldn't have been close. Quote
bisbee Posted October 20, 2011 Report Posted October 20, 2011 Yeah I'm inclined to believe the linesman just blew the call. Not gonna get salty about it, though, because this is a team we should have beaten in the first 90, and we didn't deserve it.+1No matter how big of a shafting it was, we still should have wooped Michigan. The crappy field conditions didn't help but STILL shouldn't have been close. Maybe we need to train regularly on a wet field....both of our losses were on games played on wet fields Quote
mes102 Posted October 20, 2011 Report Posted October 20, 2011 Yeah I'm inclined to believe the linesman just blew the call. Not gonna get salty about it, though, because this is a team we should have beaten in the first 90, and we didn't deserve it.+1No matter how big of a shafting it was, we still should have wooped Michigan. The crappy field conditions didn't help but STILL shouldn't have been close. Maybe we need to train regularly on a wet field....both of our losses were on games played on wet fields which means we should be out practicing RIGHT NOW... Quote
ZZZips Posted October 20, 2011 Report Posted October 20, 2011 Yeah I'm inclined to believe the linesman just blew the call. Not gonna get salty about it, though, because this is a team we should have beaten in the first 90, and we didn't deserve it.+1No matter how big of a shafting it was, we still should have wooped Michigan. The crappy field conditions didn't help but STILL shouldn't have been close. Maybe we need to train regularly on a wet field....both of our losses were on games played on wet fields Maybe we should decline TV games, both of our losses were in games played on TV! Quote
fknbuflobo Posted October 20, 2011 Report Posted October 20, 2011 Yeah I'm inclined to believe the linesman just blew the call. Not gonna get salty about it, though, because this is a team we should have beaten in the first 90, and we didn't deserve it.+1No matter how big of a shafting it was, we still should have wooped Michigan. The crappy field conditions didn't help but STILL shouldn't have been close. Maybe we need to train regularly on a wet field....both of our losses were on games played on wet fields Maybe we should decline TV games, both of our losses were in games played on TV!Not to mention the draw @ home vs. New Mexico. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.