I agree with both of your statements... All of the contenders have their weaknesses. I'm obviously a bit more critical of our Zips because I see every minute of every game. Just some off those weak points off the top of my head Toledo : Plays down to their opponents level far to often and get lazy on D. most talent anywhere in conference ... Contender Can't State : shoots poorly from the FT line. Lack of quality depth, Coaching... Pretender BG: no reliable source of offense outside of Holmes. FG and FT shooting. Jans has done a great job but they are a year or two away. Pretender EMU : can't shoot it, Zone sometimes lacks intensity. Still, I can't understand how they got off to such an awful start, I think they can still be a ... Contender Akron: No go-to-guy, poor 3pt defense. 3 happy on offensive end, FT% shooting. Youthful back court.... probably a year away but not without a chance... Contender Western : weak on the glass, poor perimeter D, inconsistent... Pretender Central : Also 3 happy but very improved. I think that they are legit in this conference despite how poorly they played here.... Contender Everybody has their own issues but I've seen Buffalo maybe 4 times this season and they just seem to have the right mix of inside/ outside talent with a nice mix of both speed and strength, I can't find one real weakness that says that they can't win it all...... My mid season favorite,