Captain Kangaroo Posted November 23, 2006 Report Share Posted November 23, 2006 I have my own thoughts on this, but I'll save them for some ridiculousy lengthy post in a week or two. Click Me for ColumnAnd someone called him a "Polyanna?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skip-zip Posted November 23, 2006 Report Share Posted November 23, 2006 If we actually are the most penalized team in the nation, the coaching staff needs to take the criticism for that. And the leaders on the field should take some responsibility for the personal fouls as well. Someone on the field needs to be demanding that everyone else concentrate on what they need to accomplish. I agree that we didn't do the "little things" as well as we did last year.I like the 3-3-5 defense because it seems to utilize our talent in the best way, but its inability to contain a quarterback on the run is now a glaring weakness that everyone has started to exploit. But I still can't figure out why there are 8 linebackers, corners, and safeties on the field, and nobody is a watchdog for the quarterback that might take off.I just hope we find that this year was the "fluke", and and not last year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue & Gold Posted November 23, 2006 Report Share Posted November 23, 2006 Here are two disturbing quotes from JD:#1: "It's hard to pinpoint why things went the way they did," he said. "You want to say your kids weren't playing hard, but they were. You want to say it was the scheme, but it wasn't."Uh, Coach, maybe the 'kids' were playing hard, but they sure weren't playing either smart or well! And as far as the scheme not being a problem?! It was (and still is) a major problem!!! Out with the 3-3! And this is not to mention the horrific absence of in-game adjustments, which truly belongs in the same conversation as 'scheme'!!!And this one just made me sick to my stomach:#2: "If you change a few plays, we're looking at 8-3," Brookhart said. Hey Coach, THAT'S PURE LOSER TALK!!! DON'T WANNA HEAR THAT EVER AGAIN!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckzip Posted November 23, 2006 Report Share Posted November 23, 2006 "#2: "If you change a few plays, we're looking at 8-3," Brookhart said."Or 2-9What makes him a great motivator?That seems to be one area the team lacks bigtime.What makes him a great recruiter?Being able to sign guys that noone else wants because they won't qualify.I am confused by that column. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RACER Posted November 23, 2006 Report Share Posted November 23, 2006 we may have had 16 starters back but it's not like we finished 10-2. at the same time i think the offense in all areas underperformed.wr dropped passed,andlack of running game. the cmu game interception at the end of the half was the turning point for that game.jd also never would make adjustments Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZipAnalyst Posted November 23, 2006 Report Share Posted November 23, 2006 I have no confidence at all in Rasor's analysis. His column is not worth a reply. Rasor does a superb job in digging out and providing information. But that is the extent of the value of his writings.The clock is running out on football at Akron. If we are not at the top of the MAC appearing in bowl games year-in and year-out in the relatively near future, I question whether or not Akron has a future in football. All we can hope for at this point is that JD will turn things around next year. We already have three years invested in him. We have no choice but to abide him at least one more year, maybe even two. But that should be it.I don't like the excuse modality that JD is into now because it is a "mirror image" of what we got from Lee Owens. And we all know the rest of the story. It was nine years that the program was stagnated. Even then Owens apologists were asking for "one more year."Excuse making is indication of satisfaction with mediocrity or worse and having a job just to have a job. This is the most disturbing aspect of JD's comments.Brookhart and Rhoades probably pay no attention to what said in the ZipNationland. One thing Rasor can do to for those of us who care about the program and write about it, is to pass on our growing "impatience" - that is if he has the courage to "possibly" jeopardize his close relationship with the coach and AD - for we all know that the messenger does bear some risk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MRasor0200 Posted November 24, 2006 Report Share Posted November 24, 2006 ZA, I don't write my columns for ZipsNation. The blog stuff is for fans like you. My columns are for students -- 90 percent of which will never attend a football game all year. It's a different audience, so I don't expect the columns to entertain you guys.As for my analysis about the team lacking leaders, J.D. told me himself that's true. You can call that excuse making, or you can call it being honest. It's a fine line coaches walk. Fans want coaches to speak frankly about what went wrong; then they are called excuse makers if they do.I still think J.D.'s a fine coach. One underachieving season and you're making him out to be Chris Palmer. And J.D. is satisfied with mediocrity? That's absurd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balki Bartokomous Posted November 24, 2006 Report Share Posted November 24, 2006 It was Chris Palmer's players who took Butch Davis' Browns to the Playoffs.just saying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipboy Posted November 24, 2006 Report Share Posted November 24, 2006 I have no confidence at all in Rasor's analysis. His column is not worth a reply. Rasor does a superb job in digging out and providing information. But that is the extent of the value of his writings.The clock is running out on football at Akron. If we are not at the top of the MAC appearing in bowl games year-in and year-out in the relatively near future, I question whether or not Akron has a future in football. All we can hope for at this point is that JD will turn things around next year. We already have three years invested in him. We have no choice but to abide him at least one more year, maybe even two. But that should be it.I don't like the excuse modality that JD is into now because it is a "mirror image" of what we got from Lee Owens. And we all know the rest of the story. It was nine years that the program was stagnated. Even then Owens apologists were asking for "one more year."Excuse making is indication of satisfaction with mediocrity or worse and having a job just to have a job. This is the most disturbing aspect of JD's comments.Brookhart and Rhoades probably pay no attention to what said in the ZipNationland. One thing Rasor can do to for those of us who care about the program and write about it, is to pass on our growing "impatience" - that is if he has the courage to "possibly" jeopardize his close relationship with the coach and AD - for we all know that the messenger does bear some risk. Isn't this about your 85th post about how Akron should drop football and put all their money in basketball? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skip-zip Posted November 24, 2006 Report Share Posted November 24, 2006 Herein lies a great question. When a coach is honestly stating what he thinks is wrong, is he making excuses? or just trying to be frank with the fans?In Lee Owens' case, he always seemed to saying what he had to in order to save his job. In fact, it still makes me sick to think about how long we put up with his mediocrity because he continued to be able to snowjob his superiors.In JD's case, only time will tell. I've never bought into the "if only a few more plays went out way, we'd have won 5 more games" mentality. But, it's far too early to tell if he's making excuses to protect himself.Please, we don't need to get rid of our football program. Akron is a large school, and should indeed be playing 1-A football. I'm looking forward to spending a few hours in the Rubber Bowl parking lot tomorrow for the last time this year.Go Zips !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Hip Zip Posted November 24, 2006 Report Share Posted November 24, 2006 Could it possibly be that we did not under achieve this season, but vastly over achieved last season? Thats the way I see it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZipAnalyst Posted November 24, 2006 Report Share Posted November 24, 2006 Re: ZipboyComment is based on Zipboy "reading what he wishes to read;" not what is actually written.I will not allow Zipboy to define me.I have never, ever said that the Zips "should" drop football. If I wanted to advocate for the dropping of football, I would be direct, clear and unmistakable in my advocacy with no apologies for doing so.Mischaracterization, distortion and sheer invention are the tools of those who wish to define a world of their own making. It doesn't speak well of those on engage these tactics. They are destructive of the continued health and vitality of this board. A fair minded person would pose the question: Did you mean to say? Are you suggesting?But not Zipboy. He knows, just ask him. His diatribe is a case-in-point of a person not interested in exchanging points-of-view. It is Zipboy's way or the highway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-Roo Posted November 24, 2006 Report Share Posted November 24, 2006 Re: ZipboyComment is based on Zipboy "reading what he wishes to read;" not what is actually written.I will not allow Zipboy to define me.I have never, ever said that the Zips "should" drop football. If I wanted to advocate for the dropping of football, I would be direct, clear and unmistakable in my advocacy with no apologies for doing so.Mischaracterization, distortion and sheer invention are the tools of those who wish to define a world of their own making. It doesn't speak well of those on engage these tactics. They are destructive of the continued health and vitality of this board. A fair minded person would pose the question: Did you mean to say? Are you suggesting?But not Zipboy. He knows, just ask him. His diatribe is a case-in-point of a person not interested in exchanging points-of-view. It is Zipboy's way or the highway.just spreading the love again analyst??? I have a friend, a long-time poster, who stopped posting and walked way from this board after being reprimanded for calling you out... good to see that he was right and you really are a what he said you are... case in point post above translated " not fair! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZipAnalyst Posted November 24, 2006 Report Share Posted November 24, 2006 Which of the 2006 juniors will step up to provide the missing senior leadership (by the 2006 seniors - per JD) for the 2007 season? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Kadar Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 For sure one of them is going to be John Mackey. Read Tuesday's Buchtelite to see what I mean! (sorry for that plug. yuck) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckzip Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 It doesn't matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbyake Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 The 2005 team had better talent by far. Hixon, Montgomery, and Biggs. Hixon was the only reason why Getsy was ever good. I watched Getsy underthrow too many receivers this year because he lacks arm strength. He did it today against Western Michigan. Hixon always bailed him out last year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyzip84 Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 I wholeheartedly agree with Mackey as a leader. Stokes, Arthur, and Walker would also be good candidates. Admitedly, this list is a bit devoid of leadership potential at first glance however :blink: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue & Gold Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 Mackey is a born leader. Stokes is also a leader. I think Jabari has potential. But, sad to say, that's about it. A year ago today I was on top of the world with this team. Today, I am peeing down my leg when I think about facing OSU to begin next season! I'm having nightmares about us being completely outclassed and embarassed!But hey, at the very least, when Getsy was smelling up the field last night, it was really good to see Carlton Jackson get some great PT! Oh, wait...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RACER Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 luke is gone now ;so who are some of the fans going to blame next year. when you get kick's blocked,most penalized team in the mac,and rush for negative yardage the last two game; it does not matter who the qb is.your not going to beat anybody.the zips have alott more issues than just the qb.i do agree he should have played some other qb's once the game was 17-0 and in the fourth qtr.now our starting qb next year has two snaps in a game.with a new ol, and qb going into osu could get ugly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.