Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/23/2016 in Posts

  1. Here's a JUCO LB that didn't select the Zips. Normally I wouldn't post anything on non-Zips, but I thought it was funny that he's posing with his new North Texas Coach while he's wearing a Tennessee shirt.
    1 point
  2. ...Akron midfielder Adam Najem also earned votes from the coaches as player of the year. ... ...Incoming Zip Emmanuel Sabbi was selected as the favorite to be the Best Freshman in college soccer for the 2016 season by the coaches. Sabbi, a member of the U.S. U20 Men’s National Team, is slated to join Akron for the fall with some lofty expectations on his shoulders. ... ...Akron, Wake Forest and Stanford also earned votes as favorites for the title. ... 2016 TDS Division I Coaches’ Survey
    1 point
  3. It is the definition of dumb-assery. If there was any doubt about the haphazard, ill-considered, tone-deaf stupidity of all that has transpired the last 24 months, this should be the final confirmation. Besides wasting money at a time of supposed grave financial crisis, it just makes the whole U look stupid and amateurish. Sure will be interesting to see how this plays out over the next couple of years-- if enrollment craters, it will precipitate a true financial crisis. And that would open the door on a state takeover. And that would lead to a consolidation that is not over our choosing or control, like the CSU merger talk of 5 or 6 years ago. The idea of shaping UA around a polytech is sound, I think-- it's actually very consistent with UA's history. It's not a stretch. The problem is that the term "polytech" doesn't mean anything to most people and for those that do have an impression, it is more akin to "trade school" than "technical institute with a practical/career-minded bent". So stipulated: it should never have been launched this way. But, now that it has, now that Scar and co. have been attaching the U to this for the last year and a half as the future and saving path, you can't just walk away from it. Instead, shift to translating "polytech" into terms that make sense to the consumer. Instead of saying "we got some pushback on our plan to rename the university, after being here for all of a cup of coffee, and when faced with that, we pretended that we had no intention of renaming but instead are re-positioning...well, not even really re-positioning, we are really just re-branding... well, not even that, it's just a tagline, really just a smudgy squiggle of meaningless words that someone stuck on there under the logo, just ignore it and pretend it never happened", they could be saying "we do constant tracking of consumer sentiment and have been paying particular attention to the saliency of the term polytechnic because that is really what we were hoping would take root. It hasn't, in part because Ohio doesn't have any heritage of this unlike California or Georgia or, well, France. So, we know now we need to go past the term to actually explaining it." Hence new tagline options: The University of Akron: We Really Really Don't Know What the f We Are Doing or The University of Akron: Somehow Making Kent Look Like a Well-Run Institution or The University of Akron: JesusChristMonkeyBalls We Have GOT to Get Our S*** Together.
    1 point
  4. Front Page ESPN story, Can Lebron deliver on the free education to UA?
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...