kreed5120

I don't know whether or not anyone had them going 12-1, but I distinctly remember several people saying this would be one of Dambrot's worst teams ever and no way we get to 21 wins. Hell we still have people that act like a 4 point halftime deficit is an insurmountable deficit. Its like have you not watched this team all season? Winning nail biters is what we do.

Besides Noah's shots not falling, I felt he played decent. In the last 2 games he has combined for 11 assists to go with 1 turnover. Last night he held Toledo's leading scorer to 4/16 from the field.

Edit: what skipzip and uazippers said.

Time to finish this one out. Not over yet. Feed it to the closer (Big Dog).

Playing great D. Just need to settle down on offense and run some plays. We're trying to force things.

Missing a lot of shots near the rim. Need to get those to fall to pull this one out.

I'm expecting big 2nd half from Big Dog and Akron win.

You can checkmark Big Dog's Titanic buzzer beater from the list.

Not sold out

The new arena is a want by both the city and the University, not a need and will be treated as such. The city has buildings and other stuff in need of dire repair as Balsy pointed out. The University has a $20M budget deficit to resolve while also fixing a shrinking enrollment. I'm in agreement with Skip that the near 9 figure arena won't happen. There is just no way either side could come close to breaking even on it and in the era of scrutinized tuition costs I'm not sure the University can afford the scrutiny of jacking up student fees that much more. I'd hope for something a tad nicer than Bowling Green like the Jack Stephens Center which was also budget friendly.

Is that you, dad?!!!

.... Edit:

The magic number is 2. We can clinch a share tonight if we win tonight and both Ohio & Buffalo lose.

My parents were in middle school when Hotel California was released...

2014 had 2 12 seeds play in Dayton. More times than not the play-in games are 11 vs. 11 because there are so few 1 bid conferences that have teams that get seeded above at-large teams. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_NCAA_Division_I_Men's_Basketball_Tournament

The play-in game can feature a 12 vs.12 match-up. It all just depends on how many AQ teams they feel are ahead of the last few at-large teams. If lets say UNC-Wilm and Akron climbed above 2 at-large teams they (Akron/UNC-Wilm) would both get an 11 seed and the play-in game would feature 2 12 seeds.

I was just answering zippy5 question. I don't think we get into the tournament unless we win the MACT. By us playing ourselves into an 11 seed, I meant I feel we could get an 11 seed if we were to run the table. In said case we wouldn't be playing in Dayton.

http://m.espn.com/ncb/bubblewatch?src=desktop&rand=ref~{"ref"%3A"https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.co.uk%2F"}&wjb

I'm too lazy to create a game thread for Akron-Kent game... E Edit: Note student tickets are still free this game. The $10 just guarantees a student a ticket pre-sale so they don't have to wait in line and potentially lose out on a ticket.

It probably won't be until after some of those landscape for learning initiatives (student center, rec center, football stadium, field house, etc.) are paid off before we get a new arena. At said point I feel it will be a joint venture between the city or county (perhaps both) and the University.

We would have to be an auto-bid 16th seed, which won't happen, to play in Dayton. The other Dayton play-in games go to the last 4 at-large teams.

I was just stating I don't feel we have the ability to reach a 9 seed. Kent State resume in '08 will end up being a lot better than ours no matter how strong we finish.

These are the sheets everyone on the selection committee is provided by the NCAA for the selection process. I get that today the bottom of the MAC is better than what it was 10 years ago. The thing is when it comes to selection time it is better to be a top heavy conference. They group all teams 200+ plus signifying there isn't that great of a difference between the 250th rated team and the 325th rated team. There is however a big difference between the 50th rated team and the 125th. The fact the MAC is filled with a bunch of mediocre teams instead of another 2-3 good to great ones hurts Akron. https://extra.ncaa.org/solutions/rpi/Stats Library/Feb. 11 Team Sheets.pdf https://extra.ncaa.org/solutions/rpi/Stats Library/Feb. 11 Nitty Gritty.pdf

Luck is just that their record is better than what sabermetrics say it should be. It doesn't necessarily require close wins. A simplified example is if teams A,B, and C are your opponents and all are deemed "equal" if you lose to team A by 20, but beat team B and C each by 7 that means you are 2-1 with a -6 scoring margin. This means you have over performed as the formula states you should be closer to 1-2, not 2-1. In Sam Houston State's case they have beaten a lot of very bad teams by single digits and Kenpom is declaring their record as fools gold.

If I counted right Kent beat 7 rpi top 100 teams that year; Cleveland State, St. Mary's, George Mason, Ohio, and Akron x 3. Akron has 0 top 100 to date and have no way of picking up any unless a team like Ohio wins enough down the stretch to move and even then it would be 1, 2 if they were to meet in tourney. No way Akron climbs to a 9 seed.