Jump to content

Zippy87

Members
  • Posts

    1,817
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34

Zippy87 last won the day on June 29

Zippy87 had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Zippy87's Achievements

Veteran

Veteran (13/14)

  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • One Year In Rare
  • Dedicated Rare
  • Conversation Starter Rare

Recent Badges

1.5k

Reputation

  1. Shammah posted an Instagram story that looks like he was working out with the Cavs or Charge. Anyone know any details?
  2. I assume his agent will shop his services around, especially if someone would be willing to give him a standard contract, but you're 100% correct in that this is good news that he at least has a spot.
  3. Wonder if Minnesota will consider Enrique.
  4. I think waivers are gone now as long as this holds up.
  5. I believe this would mean Bowen Hardman's collegiate career is over.
  6. I still think Stankovic can be a good player. Coming to the United States without a full summer of preparation had to be difficult. He absolutely showed flashes of talent at times, he just wasn't consistent or polished enough to be out there when it mattered.
  7. Both. But winning three games when everyone has equal rest vs winning two games with one or two less games than your opponent is a pretty clear advantage for the higher seed.
  8. It is a fact that during the double-bye era, the #1 and #2 seeds consistently made it to the championship game. If the goal of the MAC is to reward the top seeds for regular season performance and increase the odds of their champion being a top seed, that format absolutely accomplished that goal previously.
  9. From 2012-2015, the 1 and 2 seeds received byes to the semifinals. The championship games each of those years were: 2012: #3 Ohio over #1 Akron 2013: #1 Akron over #2 Ohio 2014: #1 WMU over #2 Toledo 2015: #2 Buffalo over #1 CMU In six years of the current format, the #1 seed has only won the tournament once, and only reached the championship game one other time. The format certainly doesn't preclude the top seeds from winning the tournament, but there was a clear reward for the top two teams during the double-bye era, given the championship game was #1 vs #2 in 3 of the 4 seasons.
  10. Why wouldn't you reward the top seeds? Again, the MAC is the only conference - to my knowledge- that doesn't reward the #1 seed at all. Right now, the only thing that matters in the MAC regular season is finishing top 8. If a conference wants to make the regular season matter more and reward teams for playing well in the regular season, you should absolutely build your tournament that way. My preferred option would be to take the top 6 teams and give 1/2 a first round bye. It's not as extreme as the double-bye, but it makes earning the 1 or 2 valuable. Thursday 5 PM - #3 vs #6 7:30 PM - #4 vs #5 Friday 5 PM - 4/5 winner vs #1 7:30 PM - 3/6 winner vs #2 Saturday 7:30 - Championship
×
×
  • Create New...