GP1

NFC Defensive Player of The WeekJust in case any of you forgot, the best player from the Owens era keeps on keeping on in the NFL. Great job Dwight!!!!

While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I have to respectfully disagree.The problem isn't just the marketing department or the record or the AD or just about anything else. The problem is the product (the MAC) and it's not just Akron. Look around at the other MAC games on TV. They are crap. I still can't figure out why I watch them.Last weekend I watched the OU vs. Miami game in the Winking Lizard. As we all know, many other D-1A games were in progress. The Miami/OU game was the most difficult to watch. Compared to the other games, the quality of player, execution, crowd and athletic level was much higher in every other game. The people of NE Ohio are not stupid, with the exception of YSU fans. Maybe someone could dupe them into going to a MAC game once, but developing repeat customers is difficult.Zips Win! made a good point about supporting the team a couple of weeks ago. He said that people should support the Z Fund. For those alumni who believe the MAC is bad entertainment and don't want to attend games, tax free donations are an easy way to support the school. I don't go to games anymore (I don't miss the Rubber Bowl, bad weather, etc. for one second), but I still support the foundation at the same level. The nice thing about it is it is only money. I can earn more money, but I can't ever get back the wasted hours at the RB or easily get over the depressing feeling the RB gives off. Football games are an all day affair. Most games last 3.25 hours with long halftimes. That's brutal. The best ticket value at UofA is the MBB team. While MAC BB is crap as well (that's why the UofA games don't sell out), the time spent watching it is only two hours.As long as the MAC remains as bad as it is, IMHO the best bet is to grow the Z-Fund donations. Selling tickets should come second as bringing people to the product the MAC is selling will result in an unhappy customer and no repeat business.

Our fans are no dummies. They know just like the rest of us that the season is defined by the MAC tournament. The rest of these games are almost exhibition games to prepare for the MAC tournament. I blame it on this garbage of a conference. Oh, and the MAC east football champ needs to win the championship game in order to be bowl eligible. What a joke....Thanks for preventing me from making fun of the conference. Like many of you, I still like the MAC. While down about it, I still like it. It reminds me of the following joke:A man hires a prostitute and disrobes in the brothel. Upon noticing the man was not well endowed, the prostitute says, "Who do you think you are going to make happy with that?"Grinning, the man says, "Me."While I think the MAC is becoming a bigger and bigger joke, if it makes us happy to watch, then God bless us all and enjoy the ride. Not everyone likes the same thing. Like what you like.

I'd like to hear more. What luck? What so-so play calling brough us back from 20 points down in the fourth quarter? Please expand.I would challenge you to find any other season in the history of the MAC (prior to these stupid divisional games rules) when a team went 5-3 in the conference and won the championship. Heck JD's predecessor got fired for going 5-3 in the MAC. We had a three way tie at the top of the East and because of some third tier tie breaker got in. We depended on the failures of other teams and a few back of the books rules. In a court of law, if the Zips were charged with Championship by luck in 2005, it'd be pretty hard to acquit. I really don't see what their record going in to the MACC has anything to do with JD calling a great game in the MACC and them winning.As far as a jury, I guess if the jury was filled with a bunch of little jealous surburbanites, then they probably would be found guilty.Enjoy the memories of the bad old days. At least you guys are gone.

D II is exactly where they all belong.......Were there many photos of his players crying in the lockerroom after their playoff loss? That would really be reliving the bad old days.

I'd like to hear more. What luck? What so-so play calling brough us back from 20 points down in the fourth quarter? Please expand.

http://www.mises.org/about/3248Ludwig von Mises was a famous economist/philosopher. See his biography above.LvM once wrote about the conditions necessary for someone to make a change (mostly in economic behavior). There will be a lot of posts in the next few days about changing JD. If anyone wants to change him, try to answer the three conditions before you decide to make a change. It is somewhat complicated, but to summarize, three conditions are necessary for someone to make a change in behavior. ALL three are necessary. They are as follows:1. Uneasiness or dissatisfaction2. A vision of a better state3. Belief that there is a possibility for a better stateHere is where the great GP1 comes down on the issue.1. Does GP1 have uneasiness or dissatisfaction about the program? Without a doubt, yes. Only a lunatic wouldn't.2. Does GP1 have a vision for a better state? Without a doubt, yes. Different defense and different play calling come to mind.3. Does GP1 believe there is a possibility for a better state? This is where it breaks down and the answer for GP1 is no. I've been with this program 20 years now at different levels and this is a 20 year assessment. UofA football has a long history of bad to really bad play. UofA has a history of student and alumni apathy. The Athletic Department functions at a financial loss that would make your nose hairs turn if you knew what it was. The people of NE Ohio just don't want to support the football program at the levels necessary to have a top notch football program.....The same can be said for almost all MAC schools. It's not just UofA, but the entire MAC is just bad entertainment and getting worse.If we let JD go now, will the overall state of the fans, alumni, students, community or tradition change? I don't see how that happens. The inertia is too great. Letting JD go, while it will give some of you short term happiness, changes little. Few cared long before JD came to UofA and few people will not care long after he is gone. Please don't bring up the new stadium as the fix. The new stadium, while necessary, is a short term fix for a long term problem.If anyone out there can answer yes to all three above, I'd be glad to listen. #3 is the toughest.

The two methods of making the NCAA Tournament are:1. Win your conference tournament2. At large bidWhat we learned last year was we are not going to get #2 for even the NIT. The only logical solution is to play for the MAC Championship and to spend the year preparing for the tournament. This doesn't mean losing games, it just means preparing the team for those three games in the winter. Actually, every team is trying to peak at the end of the year. Can it vanish in the blink of an eye? Of course, but we have to play the hand dealt. We are not in a good position.

A near perfect example of Faustian Logic. Nice work.

I had a chance to watch Winthrop play some the past two games. Good team, but beatable.They beat Georgia Tech 79-73 and looked great doing it. Then they followed it up with a loss to a very average Baylor team 62-54. Inconsistent play is normal this time of year until teams find their sea legs. As good as they looked in game one, they looked that bad in game two. They have a new coach this year so they may be getting accustomed to his style of play.Akron's ability to beat Winthrop will depend largely on the Eagles team that shows up. If the good Eagles show up, Akron will not stand a chance on the road against a very athletic team that is accustomed to winning. If the bad Eagles show up, Akron will have a punchers chance of winning the game. Either way, Akron will need to bring it's "A" game in order to win on the road.Good luck Zips!

This is an amazing statistic. Not in that we give up the rebounds........it's amazing in that somebody actually tabulates the statistic. Coming in last in the freaking country is just nonsense. Getting that rebound should be a given.I saw Charlie Coles once take out a kid for missing a free throw and yelled at him for missing it for a minute or two. In the past, KD has worried a lot about defense. He should start punishing players for not putting the little orange ball through the orange ring at critical points in the game.

If this is the strategy, I don't find fault in the logic. In fact, I think there are a lot of teams that look at it the same way. There are probably some programs like Duke, UCLA, etc. that know they are going to make the NCAA and spend all year preparing for March. Unfortunately, the college basketball regular season has become almost insignificant to the tournaments. Knowing they have no shot at an at large bid makes spending the year preparing for the MAC Tournament the logical move. Akron is going to win more than they lose so they are guaranteed a good season. The only question comes down to whether or not they can make the NCAA Tournament or not.

Ridiculous!Be careful of the ad homonym attacks.ZA is the type of person who would fart in a crowed room, blame it on someone else and then lecture the room on how inappropriate it is to fart in a crowded room.

I don't know how a post about JD makes it onto the basketball page other than petty and personal animosity.With that said, KD is a very good coach. The biggest difference between him and JD and the soccer coach is that JD and the soccer coach come through when they make it to the MACC. If JD gets fired after this week, he will leave here with a championship ring on his finger. A ring is something KD is still lacking and is largely at fault for not having one.Zips fans should be patient to see what KD does this season and probably next season. KD is a Zip, and as such, should be treated a little differently IMHO. After being badly out coached and out played in the MACC last winter, that team owes you die hard fans a championship in a season when they are not predicted to win. This season would be a good one to do just that.

Everyone needs to go take a look at this web page. It should be titled DollarGeneralonLine.com. Two things stand out.First, there is a good chance that 4....maybe 5 teams of the 13 will finish the season with winning records (.500 or above). That's just plain bad.Second, if Miami loses to OU this week, they limp into the MACC with a 6-6 record. If they lose the MACC, they don't go bowling. Is there another conference out there where the runner up played itself out of a bowl by making it to the conference championship and then losing? Only in the MAC.........

All good points.A lot of the solutions come down to winning. I'm not certain that is the problem. Miami is on the brink of going to the MACC (actually, I think they got in yesterday) and there was not anyone at the game Wednesday.When I go to MAC games, I see a lot of very average talent o the field compared to what I could see at a Big East or even ACC game. I think when the average person looks at the MAC, the talent (product) just falls inches short of what they would expect for them to spend a day of their life and money to go see. They certainly wouldn't spend a lot of money to go see it. MAC players are much more likely to drop a pass or slip and fall or just really do something stupid. That really isn't good entertainment.The reason the MAC needs to play on Wednesday and Tuesday nights is nobody wants to watch it. ESPN needs to fill air space and promote it's Saturday ESPN/ABC line-up. The MAC makes good filler. If it was a better product, ESPN would show it on Saturdays.

While we do not know how good Rogers is, CJ11 is not the answer. Getting a good frickin quarterback is the difference between 8-4 and 4-8 in the MAC. I'm watching the Oregon-Arizona game and Oregon's qb left with an injury. With the back-up in, Oregon looks like a second tier MAC school. They look, fat, slow, with poor special teams, an awful defense and I swear I'm watching CJ11 play on consecutive nights. A major BCS school looks this bad? It just goes to show how much a good quarterback hides other weaknesses.Good points.I've been saying on this board for years not that the first thing a team needs is a QB that can win games. In this day and age, that means a QB that is smart, mobile, above average arm and can run with the ball in the read option. You guys look at the highly ranked teams as your examples. My example would be Wake Forest. Wake has little to offer as a major college program and should never make a bowl game; however, Skinner is a smart and mobile QB with an above average arm that manages the spread offense very well and is a winner. They have six wins and will make a bowl game with very average to below average talent.The spread offense masks an average to below average offensive line. It can also move the ball enough and score enough points to mask a bad defense.Akron's problems have never been about defense or offensive line. It has almost always been about the lack of a QB that can win games when it really matters.Getting to another point on the board about Illinois not being better than OSU. That's just not true. Illinois came into Columbus and kicked OSU's ass up and down the field. At the end of the day, that means you are a better team. In the fourth quarter, they absolutely dominated that overrated defense OSU puts on the field. OSU's defense looks great against YSU, Akron and the host of bad teams they play in the Big Ten. It will look great today against that antiquated offense Michigan runs. Zook learned in the SEC what it takes to win in big time college football. With the exception of Northwestern and Indiana, nobody else runs the read option. Illinois wil be good for a lot of years because Zook knows it is about a mobile QB. Illinois is actually just getting started. In the near future, OSU's offense will be antiquated as well and they will try to run the read option with the talent they recruited and they will look like Akron this year trying to do it.I'm glad you made this last point...How much more can one team dominate the opponent, on the road, with everyone healthy and still be called inferior. But that's what happens when living in Ohno! And one more thing, how can the offsides on the fumble vs. MU be ignored. If that happened in c-bus, the entire city would be on fire.We had the Illinois game on at my house yesterday (why anyone would watch that 14-3 horrible OSU game is beyond me) and I heard that the top four teams in the Big Ten were OSU, Michigan, PSU and IL. IL beat OSU, Michigan and PSU. That means they are the best of the top four. If they don't stumble with a young team early, they win the Big Ten as they are the best team in the Big Ten at this point in the season.Illinois is going to be good next year. OSU needs to go to IL. OSU had better enjoy the Rose Bowl this year because IL is the team to beat in the future.I'll stop now with the non-Zip issues.

We talk a lot on this board about why people don't go to Akron, or even MAC games (with the exception of Temple who just broke the MAC single season attendance record). A lot of blame gets pointed at the Marketing Department or the commissioner of the MAC. Here is another way of looking at it....Last night my wife, who is infinitely smarter than I am, which makes her even that much smarter than everyone else on this board, made a really good point to me about why people don't go to MAC games. She doesn't put much blame on marketing departments or the MAC. She said, "Marketing the MAC is like being the Director of Marketing at Dollar General. You can get people to shop once, but once they see the crap you are selling, they don't want to come back." After that game Wednesday night, I don't see much fault in her logic.Unfortunately, Akron, and most MAC schools, can get people to fill a stadium when they give out free tickets. We've seen that for years at UofA. Even when they have been good, people still do not see the value in spending a lot of money to go see the product. Since people don't want to spend the money, we get a Dollar General type product thrown at us. Miami needed a win against UofA to help forward their chances to make the MACC and nobody went to the game. Why would anyone go to a game where the potential winner of a conference could potentially win the league with 5-6 loses?Now that the MAC is back to what it was during the pre-Marshall days, it is only going to get worse. It is just a bad league.I love the MAC and want it to get better. Now that I'm away from it and can look at it more objectively, I'm not certain it can be any more than what it is right now. That's too bad.Have a good weekend everyone.

While we do not know how good Rogers is, CJ11 is not the answer. Getting a good frickin quarterback is the difference between 8-4 and 4-8 in the MAC. I'm watching the Oregon-Arizona game and Oregon's qb left with an injury. With the back-up in, Oregon looks like a second tier MAC school. They look, fat, slow, with poor special teams, an awful defense and I swear I'm watching CJ11 play on consecutive nights. A major BCS school looks this bad? It just goes to show how much a good quarterback hides other weaknesses.Good points.I've been saying on this board for years not that the first thing a team needs is a QB that can win games. In this day and age, that means a QB that is smart, mobile, above average arm and can run with the ball in the read option. You guys look at the highly ranked teams as your examples. My example would be Wake Forest. Wake has little to offer as a major college program and should never make a bowl game; however, Skinner is a smart and mobile QB with an above average arm that manages the spread offense very well and is a winner. They have six wins and will make a bowl game with very average to below average talent.The spread offense masks an average to below average offensive line. It can also move the ball enough and score enough points to mask a bad defense.Akron's problems have never been about defense or offensive line. It has almost always been about the lack of a QB that can win games when it really matters.Getting to another point on the board about Illinois not being better than OSU. That's just not true. Illinois came into Columbus and kicked OSU's ass up and down the field. At the end of the day, that means you are a better team. In the fourth quarter, they absolutely dominated that overrated defense OSU puts on the field. OSU's defense looks great against YSU, Akron and the host of bad teams they play in the Big Ten. It will look great today against that antiquated offense Michigan runs. Zook learned in the SEC what it takes to win in big time college football. With the exception of Northwestern and Indiana, nobody else runs the read option. Illinois wil be good for a lot of years because Zook knows it is about a mobile QB. Illinois is actually just getting started. In the near future, OSU's offense will be antiquated as well and they will try to run the read option with the talent they recruited and they will look like Akron this year trying to do it.

Successful teams are still running the read option. We have the players to run it with the exception of the QB.Interview coaches, probably in their mid-20 and right out of graduate school, who have been with successful programs running the offense. Make that person your OC. Other coaches will complain of feel slighted, but that's too bad.If McDaniels can be the oc at New England at a young age, why not bring a young guy here.

If JD is smart, he leaves after this year before he ends up in the graveyard.

It is both. We have an OC who has never played or coached the read offense they use. My biggest complaint about the read offense we use is the QB NEVER keeps the ball. There is no reason to defend against the QB running. Every other team that runs it has a running QB and is successful with it. Look what Florida does with it. Hell, look what an average team like Illinios did with it against that "great"(?) osu defense last week. The kicked the crap out of osu with the same offense Florida used to kick the crap out of them last January.

I saw the same thing.

Bingo. I hate the term sense of urgency, but that's the best way to describe it.Second and four in the second quarter after a penalty on around the Miami 35. We have in our third team running back who does nothing but run east-west. What does he do? He runs east west for no gain. Third and four, we throw a sideways pass for no gain. Punt. A FG could have put the game out of reach.At that point, I look at my wife and say, "Akron calls plays like every play is first and ten." With second and four, we should have had our starting running back in the game and run him twice to get the first down.That was horrible last night........I have to get on a plane.

They could easily use the same promotion for their basketball team.......