Jump to content

Michael Haywood meeting with Pitt....


Dr Z

Recommended Posts

I have to say, ITZ's first comment was in no way racist. Politically incorrect yes, but racist no (either way it'd be culturist if anything).

The fact is, in today's world, teams/organizations are forced to interview minority HC candidates just to cover their a$$es. It's wrong but it's definitely happening and you're lying to yourself if you believe otherwise.

I dont know if that is what Pitt is doing, but i wouldn't be surprised if it was.

*edit* looking back, for some reason I thought ITZ said that Haywood "got the interview" because of his skin tone, not "got hired because of it". I still dont think ITZ was being any bit racist but I will be first (or 7th) to say he's wrong.

How did I know RootforRoo would come to his defense?

Because, R4R isn't one to jump on the lynch mob over someone stating something that is partially true. We live in a world where "racism" only exists coming from whites. The real wrong here (besides ITZ most likely being wrong on the reason Pitt hired Haywood) is the fact that what ITZ is saying actually happens in the sporting world and real world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ITZ, your exact words were: "Haywood got that job because of his skin tone." That's a pretty definitive statement, and one that you can't possibly know to be true. But why even bring it up? It just begs to be countered by the history of all the white coaches over the decades who got their jobs because of their skin tone. Skin color has always been a fact of life in football coaching to varying degree, from the days of "whites only" to the days of enforced anti-discrimination.

As far as your stereotyping of guilt-ridden white guys, I earned my street creds in rural Louisiana in the late '60s and early '70s when there were still Jim Crow laws on the books. I spent a lot of time hanging out with blacks in public, which eventually came to the attention of the local chapter of the KKK. I received a warning from a third party that I'd been targeted by the KKK, and the message was that if I didn't move my butt out of that little town fast that something bad was going to happen to me.

A week later a massive fire started under mysterious circumstances in the apartment complex where I lived. Again, word came to me through a third party that the KKK was pissed because they torched the wrong apartment, and the fire just missed my unit. I vividly recall sitting in the fire chief's office telling him about the threat from the KKK. That silver-haired southern gentleman smiled, told me he was certain that the KKK had nothing to do with it, and proceded to lecture me about how misunderstood the KKK was and how much good they had done for folks over the years. I just shook my head and walked out, thinking every city official in that little town probably felt the same way and there was no hope of justice.

Then I got a call from the FBI, who wanted to meet with me. In our meeting they said they had been monitoring the local KKK chapter because it was more active than others, and they had evidence of a number of incidents for which they planned to bust that chapter. They said what I told them fit in with other information they had, thanked me, and told me not to tell anyone I had spoken with them. I can't say what eventually happened, because that very week I received a job offer in California and moved out there within days.

So, yes, I do have a history of being sensitive to racist comments and racist actions, and with good cause, including much more than just this one incident. There are still plenty of racists today, and many of them use the same type of wording that appeared in your initial post.

However, in your second post you try to clarify that you did not intend for your words to convey a racist message. As I've said before on this forum, I take a man at his word unless there's compelling evidence to prove otherwise. If you agree that it's fair to have rules to protect otherwise qualified candidates from being excluded for consideration solely on the basis of their skin color, and that skin color was not the primary consideration for Pitt selecting a highly qualified coach, then you and I have no disagreement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Haywood is done.

Yep. I don't see how Pitt can keep him or why they would want to keep him.

This is a stupid, stupid, stupid man. Two things....First, don't get jailed the Friday before a holiday weekend. There are no judges around to hear your case so you sit in jail all weekend in the drunk tank.

Second, when you come into around $1.0 million, let your lawyers talk to your baby momma/baby momma's lawyers. You can afford the lawyers now. He had to know this woman was going to try to shake him down when his salary went from $175,000 to whatever it is a Pitt.

Actually, this is a good demonstration case for how insane some college football coaches are. They live in a strange world where it is encouraged that you be a prick. They also live in a world where it is encouraged to work 24/7. That is not natural or even good for the people doing it. This guy is a prick and it worked at Miami on the football field. Being a prick didn't work off the field in this case. Some of these guys can't turn it off...see the coach of the Raiders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can people please stop hiring these ex-Notre Dame coaches. Really hasn't been working out so well.

It will continue to not work out well. The Charlie Weis tree is not successful. In fact, basing who you hire on which "coaching tree" they come from is asking for disaster. Just because you learned from a master does not make you a master as well.

Weis was hired to be the OC at Florida next season. That train wreck should be interesting to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weis was hired to be the OC at Florida next season. That train wreck should be interesting to watch.

I'm not sure if Todd Haley or Bill Belichick would agree with you on this. Charlie may have failed as a HC, but he clearly knows a little about being a successful OC. And in a place like UF, he'll be able to have the talent needed to make the pro-style offense work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is an important lesson to be learned by all from this episode.
How about, don't post that a certain coach is leaving our team and a certain coach is coming until you can actually prove it, instead of posting a bunch of rumors from unreliable sources. Somehow I think that lesson will be lost by some....AGAIN.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...