Jump to content

AkronAlumnus

Members
  • Posts

    1,299
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

AkronAlumnus last won the day on September 28

AkronAlumnus had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About AkronAlumnus

  • Birthday 04/12/1994

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Nashville
  • Interests
    big Channel Banks fan

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

AkronAlumnus's Achievements

Mentor

Mentor (12/14)

  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Dedicated Rare
  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • First Post Rare

Recent Badges

483

Reputation

  1. Another winnable game, go and win it!!
  2. Filthy tie but better than an L
  3. I like a relegation system, jk kinda...
  4. Wow, such a winnable game.
  5. You'd think we'd have a good kicker
  6. Whats up with these two-three yard passes when down under 1 minute
  7. This is such a winnable game. Smh
  8. Wow, terrible officiating thus far
  9. Excuse my ignorance btw, I am VERY new to soccer especially the college game.
  10. That makes sense. I think strength of schedule is probably a big part of what I was missing. I guess I’m still wondering how they weigh different results against each other. For example, is a tie against a top-25 team viewed as better than a win against an unranked team? Or does a tie against an unranked team hurt worse than a loss to a ranked team? And do they look beyond the result itself—shots, possession, fouls, etc.—or is it mainly about the result and strength of schedule? That’s really what I was getting at with those four teams. I understand why a loss to a highly ranked Maryland team might not hurt Georgetown much, and I certainly don’t think UA should be ahead of them after losing the H2H. I’m just curious how that compares to Creighton and Xavier being unbeaten.
×
×
  • Create New...