Jump to content

AkronAlumnus

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,141

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

AkronAlumnus last won the day on January 25

AkronAlumnus had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About AkronAlumnus

  • Birthday 04/12/1994

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Nashville
  • Interests
    big Channel Banks fan

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

AkronAlumnus's Achievements

Mentor

Mentor (12/14)

  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Dedicated Rare
  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • First Post Rare

Recent Badges

420

Reputation

  1. AkronAlumnus
    3/6
  2. AkronAlumnus
    Got my hoodie in Nashville yesterday, still waiting for the hat - figured they would have shipped together.
  3. AkronAlumnus
    They won!!
  4. AkronAlumnus
    Regardless, doesn't really matter. Go Zips!!
  5. AkronAlumnus
    Based off this year's success, I wouldn't be surprised if both schools surpass $25M next season. I can't find any numbers but I'd guess Iowa's roster spend was north of $20M this season Edit: Iowa Swarm collective website is down ATM
  6. AkronAlumnus
    I'm with you 100% on the revenue sharing as I understand schools divide it amongst all sports. I'd think the NIL coffers would be bigger for a litany of reasons. Even at a 3-1 football to hoops donation ratio, I'd still think B1G programs would far and away surpass - it's so hard to determine bc this stuff isn't publically accessible.
  7. AkronAlumnus
    Nebraska and Iowa aren’t comparable to Butler in terms of scale: Butler has ~5.8k students Iowa has ~30k students Nebraska has ~ 50k students That’s 5–8x the enrollment, which translates directly into much larger alumni bases and NIL donor pools. I somewhat agree that Butler can make a run, but it’s not operating with anything close to the same structural resources as a B1G program.
  8. AkronAlumnus
    I think the MAC should keep midweek games, but handle them smarter. The exposure from being the only games on is real and valuable, and it’s become part of the conference’s identity. That said, it shouldn’t fall on the same team(s) all year. Rotate which teams play those weeknight slots so the burden—and the spotlight—is divided up between week nights and weekends.
  9. AkronAlumnus
    Would be cool to pickup Jesse. I'd pass on the rest but I don't really know them.
  10. AkronAlumnus
  11. AkronAlumnus
    Might be worth keeping an eye on players’ social media—if I remember right, last year they started posting graphics announcing their return about a week or two after the tourney loss.
  12. AkronAlumnus
    Somewhat worried about retention but I think they'll reload regardless.
  13. AkronAlumnus
    Favorites went 16-0 yesterday. Edit: article to supplement - https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/march-madness-betting-favorites-go-16-0-in-friday-s-slate-for-first-time-since-1992/ar-AA1Z6lue?apiversion=v2&domshim=1&noservercache=1&noservertelemetry=1&batchservertelemetry=1&renderwebcomponents=1&wcseo=1
  14. AkronAlumnus
    Huge, if so!!
  15. AkronAlumnus
    Give em hell, Zips!!
×
×
  • Create New...