CoachGerry Posted September 21, 2012 Report Posted September 21, 2012 President, staff, faculty get raises at University of Akron By Carol Biliczky Beacon Journal staff writer Published: September 21, 2012 - 12:22 AM | Updated: September 21, 2012 - 11:48 AM Faculty and staff at the University of Akron are in line for retroactive raises that will show up in their October paychecks. Trustees this week OK’d raise pools of 3 percent for staff and 5.5 percent for faculty. Because these are pools of money, not all employees will see the same hike in their paychecks. “During these challenging times, it is vital we remain competitive,” UA President Luis Proenza said in a media release. “With this action by the board, we are more appropriately aligned with Ohio’s higher education marketplace.” Trustees also gave Proenza his yearly raise — 5 percent, or $20,250, which brings his salary to $425,250. All of the increases will cost the university an additional $5.4 million a year, UA spokeswoman Eileen Korey said. Complete Story Found by Clicking Here Quote
GP1 Posted September 21, 2012 Report Posted September 21, 2012 I would bet he has an employment contract this does not impact. Same with the coaches in probably every case. Quote
UAZipster0305 Posted September 21, 2012 Report Posted September 21, 2012 I would like to propose to the administrators/moderators that content copy and pasted in its entirety from an online source not be permitted. As a Nation, we complain about there not being enough Zips coverage by media outlets. Then, when there is coverage, we diminish the hits and corresponding advertising potential by essentially stealing the content and posting it here. It's a self-deprecating cycle. Quote
LZIp Posted September 21, 2012 Report Posted September 21, 2012 I would like to propose to the administrators/moderators that content copy and pasted in its entirety from an online source not be permitted. As a Nation, we complain about there not being enough Zips coverage by media outlets. Then, when there is coverage, we diminish the hits and corresponding advertising potential by essentially stealing the content and posting it here. It's a self-deprecating cycle. really? Quote
Dave in Green Posted September 21, 2012 Report Posted September 21, 2012 AFAIK, it's considered copyright infringement to reproduce a copyrighted story in its entirety for public distribution (as on an internet forum) without permission. Under the fair use rule, a small portion of a copyrighted story may be reproduced as long as the source is clearly acknowledged. Some internet forums protect themselves by insisting that forum members refrain from posting a copyrighted story in its entirety. The generally accepted best practice is to post a small portion of the story with a link to the actual story on its original website. Quote
LZIp Posted September 22, 2012 Report Posted September 22, 2012 I guess we will complain about anything. Source was noted and link was provided. Who cares. Quote
zestycoyote Posted September 22, 2012 Report Posted September 22, 2012 I guess we will complain about anything. Source was noted and link was provided. Who cares. The news outlets care. If there are fewer hits on articles, that (theoretically) means fewer people are reading. That means less coverage. It's just a matter of respecting someone else's work, really. People write these articles, not robots. Quote
UAZipster0305 Posted September 22, 2012 Report Posted September 22, 2012 The news outlets care. If there are fewer hits on articles, that (theoretically) means fewer people are reading. That means less coverage. It's just a matter of respecting someone else's work, really. People write these articles, not robots. Thank you. Quote
zippy5 Posted September 23, 2012 Report Posted September 23, 2012 On top of respecting their work, pasting a whole article could be a copyright violation for zno owners Quote
OZoner Posted September 23, 2012 Report Posted September 23, 2012 I guess we will complain about anything. Source was noted and link was provided. Who cares. It's illegal. As noted, it's copyright infringement. And it can cause a hassle for board admins when they get removal notices. Quote
RootforRoo44 Posted September 23, 2012 Report Posted September 23, 2012 It's illegal. As noted, it's copyright infringement. And it can cause a hassle for board admins when they get removal notices. Let's get this straight before anyone else continues this nonsense: As the OP posted, it is NOT illegal. A small excerpt and a link to the source is entirely alright and legal. Now, as far as getting clicks to the original story, it's usually far better to have an excerpt to draw people in, rather than to just post a link with the title. The way this was posted was the best way to get people's attention and get the hits to the local media that several of you (rightfully) think we need. Quote
LZIp Posted September 23, 2012 Report Posted September 23, 2012 Let's get this straight before anyone else continues this nonsense: As the OP posted, it is NOT illegal. A small excerpt and a link to the source is entirely alright and legal. Now, as far as getting clicks to the original story, it's usually far better to have an excerpt to draw people in, rather than to just post a link with the title. The way this was posted was the best way to get people's attention and get the hits to the local media that several of you (rightfully) think we need. Thank you. Quote
OZoner Posted September 24, 2012 Report Posted September 24, 2012 Let's get this straight before anyone else continues this nonsense: As the OP posted, it is NOT illegal. A small excerpt and a link to the source is entirely alright and legal. To be clear, I wasn't referring to the OP but the discussion after about posting entire articles. Quote
Spin Posted September 24, 2012 Report Posted September 24, 2012 I clicked through again. Just sayin'. Quote
MDZip Posted May 13, 2013 Report Posted May 13, 2013 For those that think Proenza is highly overpaid, here is CNN's list of the highest paid Public University Presidents. The Top Ten (Ball State? Really?) Graham B. Spanier* Pennsylvania State University $2,906,271 Jay Gogue Auburn University $2,542,865 E. Gordon Gee Ohio State University $1,899,420 Alan G. Merten George Mason University $1,869,369 Jo Ann M. Gora Ball State University $984,647 Mary Sue Coleman University of Michigan $918,783 Charles W. Steger Virginia Tech $857,749 Mark G. Yudof University of California $847,149 Bernard J. Machen University of Florida $834,562 Francisco G. Cigarroa University of Texas $815,833 Quote
pat Posted May 13, 2013 Report Posted May 13, 2013 For those that thin Proenza is highly overpaid, here is CNN's list of the highest paid Public University Presidents. The Top Ten (Ball State? Really?) Graham B. Spanier* Pennsylvania State University $2,906,271 Jay Gogue Auburn University $2,542,865 E. Gordon Gee Ohio State University $1,899,420 Alan G. Merten George Mason University $1,869,369 Jo Ann M. Gora Ball State University $984,647 Mary Sue Coleman University of Michigan $918,783 Charles W. Steger Virginia Tech $857,749 Mark G. Yudof University of California $847,149 Bernard J. Machen University of Florida $834,562 Francisco G. Cigarroa University of Texas $815,833 ..very good point. I never thought that Dr. P was overpaid. He deserves every penny of his humble salary. And for those who compare a president of a university to the president of the United States, I say, apples and oranges. And I see the usual negative, ignorant Akron hicks on Ohio.com have their usual dumb comments to make. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.