When you look at this data, the two words that leap to mind are "unsustainable" and "ridiculous". I can't help but look at this from an overall NEO perspective, aggregating what UA, Can't, CSU and YSU are spending. All are public universities whose students come from the area. In aggregate, these students are being burdened with about $60 million a year subsidizing sports (UA and Can't $42M of that total). Basically, the public college students of NEO are paying to build an Infocision Stadium each and every year. I don't see how this is at all sustainable. When UA jumped to 1-A, the disparity with the top tier schools was massive. Now, that difference is an order of magnitude larger than that. With this playoff set up and the advent of direct payments, the gap will not only grow larger, it will grow even faster. UA and MAC schools will face a choice-- exhaust themselves financially or get off the hamster wheel by dropping down (or out altogether like UAB). Our other option, because of geography, is confederating UA and Can't in some way, which in some other threads I have made the argument for at least studying. To me, these numbers-- the sheer size of them-- not only begs that question, but demands a serious look at anything that might alter the collective trajectory.