GP1

Wow! I was out of state all weekend and I only saw the score on the television ticker. The hangover I had from the rehearsal dinner I attended left me rather incapacitated Saturday so I watched TV and recovered prior to the wedding. I'm glad I really couldn't see the game. Had I known what happened, my head would have exploded along with the other parts of my body that were exploding from all of the Mexican food I ate Friday. It sounds from everything I am reading that we did not play four solid quarters. That's too bad, the team still has some growing to do. Three points in the first half of a game is disaster waiting to happen. It's too hard to come from behind and win games. Any chance the two road games in a row had something to do with the slow start? Only 34% of the time do NFL teams playing a second road game in a row win. Again, I didn't see or hear the game so I really can't give much of an opinion. If you are looking for anything positive, it would be that they were at least in position to win at the end event though they fell short. In years past, the team would have given up at half. I'm pretty concerned about the OU game. My brother lives in central Ohio and goes to almost every OU game. He has coached in college in the past and at the D-1 level. My undertanding is that Coach Frank has OU playing way over their heads through hard work on every play. If Akron does not decide to play until the third quarter this week, they will certainly lose. If losers think they can win, there is a chance they can win. Akron must score on OU early and make them think they can't win.

The league is a mystery to me this year. All we know for certain is we will beat Can't.

I know it's WAY early, but here it goes... Christmas in San Diego = Good New Years in Nashville = Good = Tootsies Orchid Lounge Day after Christmas in Detroit = Good, I'd take anything. http://www.collegefootballnews.com/2005/Bo...Projections.htm

Completing a little over 50% of his passes was where we were at the beginning of the season. Most importantly, he did not have an interception. Getsy had an average game Saturday by D-1 QB standards, but that does not matter. All he needs to do is keep the chains moving and not have turnovers. Biggs and an improved offensive line saved us Saturday. I voted for Getsy and I stand by my pick.

Here is why I'm encouraged about the remainder of the season. The Zips showed a lot of heart today. They could have easiy fell apart after that game last week and the slow start today and they did not. While they did not play a great game, the effort was there every play and I think that was lacking last week. This team seems more emotionally tough than in years past. The MAC is so hard to read this year, I have no idea how they will do other than say they will beat Can't. Ball State could be good next week, or they could have shot their wad this week...who knows. OU is scary right now, but let's worry about them when the time comes. Right now this team needs to focus on next week and playing hard every down like they did this week. I'm shocked Biggs had 150 + this week. There were so many one and two yard losses, it must have been rushing and receiving. Anyhow, my favorite Zip did not disappoint this week. Getsy was average again today, but all he needs to be is average when they run so well. Most importantly, he did not have a turnover and the team did not have a turnover. Great job defense. Try to get more three and outs though. I worry too much on those long drives. For those of you who did not go, you missed a great day for college football. Even though I drove myself, it looked like the University did a great job organizing buses to the games and the fans had a great time. God I love going to MAC football games! One last thing. Did anyone listen to the BG post game radio show? If so, did their coach come off as a classless a-hole, or was it me? He complained that the replays did not go their way and was taking the word of his players over the replay screen. Also, he did not give any credit to Akron for playing a good game. I just thought he came off as a jerk. Anyhow, don't forget to fall back tonight. Here's to a Zips win.

Terry Pluto Field - It's only 50 yards long, but that's OK as long as everyone feels good.

If true, this is really funny. However, it really doesn't matter because he is an adult and wasn't breaking any crimes. I wish the Zips had a bye week right about now so they could go out and blow off some steam. I think they could use it. I will say this though...Frye's appearance obviously left the stench of mediocrity on the Zips and they have not been able to wash it off since. It's like getting sprayed by a skunk. They were fine up until that point. Someone please order a truckload of tomato juice and fill the pool at the Rec. Center with it so the boys can wash off the stench.

I always though it was, "see which one fills up first".

It looks like you will need a booster chair.

I feel much better about this issue today. The only thing I disagree with Pluto about is the size of the new stadium. We have to be able to fit at least 25,000 into the field for games such as Can't. Maybe 20,000 seats with a hillside like Virginia or even OU would be a nice thing to have.

I agree with this and I posted this recommendation last Sunday. I would not start the game with it, but if we continue to be sluggish, it is worth a shot.

Excellent points DrZ. Everyone is still missing what happened to the Zips last Saturday. We were beat in an NFL manner by an NFL coach. Here is how you win an NFL game. Control the field position, score first, take away the other team's best player (ours is Biggs), pressure the QB that must throw and run the clock out on a tired defense. Last week, we lost to Army's punter and their second all time rushing back who ran on a tired defense late. I'm not saying Getsy played well Saturday....he had his worst game of the year. There are many more problems in addition to him. I think not having a bye week is killing this team right now. They look exhausted and a week off could do them some good. Breaking routine is good for the human psyche and they could use one.

Man does this thread remind me of the bad old days. I'll say it again, it can always get worse. I remember the bench Andy Kubik comments. We did and put in a guy named Mark Unitis to start against Louisville in 1987 and he was worse. I remember the bench Jeff Sweitzer days. We did and played Weems a little and he was worse. Be careful of what you wish for guys.

Easy CK. If you keep going on like this, you could overtake me for the most bitter person on the site.

I've seen Pope. Cocky guy, predicting touchdowns like this? I hope we cream him. CK, this is a great post! I can't believe nobody has commented on it yet. Check out the bling on that guy. I've never seen a more humorless group of people than the posters on this site.

I had to laugh out loud when I saw this quote. ITZ, you must be in graduate school after your playing days, because anyone who has ever worked a job after college would give their left nut to only have to go to football practice, lift some weights, watch film like they are paying attention and play a game on the weekend. I had a friend in college who worked his way through UA as a night janitor at a junior high school on South Main Street. His nights consisted of cleaning everything in the school from the floors to the boxes full of used tampons in the girls restrooms. He took a full schedule and graduated with an Accounting degree in four years while living off of pasta and cigarettes. Now he's a controller for Sherwin Williams. How were those prepared meals for you in Robs? You can try to full some of the people on this site like they don't know any better, but some of us can see right through the "look how hard the athletes have it" argument. It wasn't all that tough.

I would like to propose a ZipsNation.org table for this event. It's probably $10 per person if you get a "corporate" table. Any suggestions from the board organizers how we could put this together?

It can always get worse. You can take your suggestion and stick it up your . I'll spend my time the way I want to.

I don't know if removing Getsy from QB is going to make a difference. I do know this. He has not played the same since injuring his hand against CMU. Jabari is not the answer. I'm sick of his lazy performances at WR and I don't want him at QB. Ferg? Well, if we want to go from a QB with little mobility to one with zero mobility, that is the answer. Getsy is all we have for now. Get over it. One thing I noticed last night was that the robotic nature of our offense does not allow our receivers to improvise once the pocket breaks down. I went to about five Pitt games Brookhart's last year there and Rutheford (sp?) had the same problems scrambling Getsy does now. Our receivers do not have the natural ability to get free as we have seen in the past. Maybe if they would stop jogging around when the qb scrambles, we would be better off. Speaking of jogging. We seem to have two speeds as of late. One is jog, the other is walk. Our offensive line jogs onto the field to get in the huddle and walk to the line. Let's start moving a little faster guys. Akron needs to change the pace when their offense is having trouble. Why did we not go to a hurry up offense in the middle of the third quarter when things weren't going well? That is always a good way to pick up the pace of a team. I think the reason we don't do things like this is the coaches are as robotic as the offense. They spend an insane amount of time looking at film hoping to figure out that one play that will get them two yards on their own 30 yard line, they forget about the big picture or even the human factor. Maybe some of the younger guys can answer this question, but why is our blocking technique one where the OL blocks with their shoulders perpendicular to the line? This appears to be a horrible technique because it allows bleed through. You don't see this technique on Sundays. We should be doing what they do on Sunday. It's no wonder we can't get our running game going. We don't force our will on others. When we went for fourth down when we were down by ten, were we on the 25? Hard to tell from the beer garden. If so, I had a flushback to the Owens years. We needed to break our cherry and get on the board. Maybe that would have given us some momentum. Someone brought up the Owens years. I have no doubt the Zips would have scored under Owens last night. I also have no doubt that that loser would have found a way to lose that game like almost every game he coached. Enough said. There has been a lot of talk about leadership on this board and I think a lot of misguided opinions about what leadership is. It starts with giving 100% effort every play from a few of your best players. Until that happens, guys can walk off the field screaming and throwing helmets all they want, but they are not showing leadership until they give 100%. I'm not even certain we saw great leadership last season as everyone likes to think. It was good, but not great. Great leaders lead from the start of the season, not six games into it. I think our schedule was more easy after the first five games and we won five in a row and then lost to a better team the final game. Nothing magical about that. I had a chance to catch up with a bunch of players from the early Faust years last night and to a man, they were offended by the effort the players were giving. We may have had half our team in jail by mid season, but at least the other half out on bail was giving 100%. Man am I really pissed at myself today . I went with "somebody" and picked the Zips to win last night forgetting what I wrote after either the Buffalo or Miami game. I said then that I thought the wheels were about to fall off the team. I had a feeling then and should have stuck with it. The wheels are completely off of this team. I think losing the remainder of the games is not out of the question (Oddly enough, we could still win the MAC East, but that won't happen). We should really be talking about how many points the team will score. My guess is less than 75 the remainder of the season. If we lose out and win only three games, it will have repercussions for years to come. I see trouble on the horizon. One last thing. I was talking with a prominent business man from Akron who is also a graduate of the University after the game downtown. He said he would love to go to some games and would even buy season tickets if they had a stadium on campus, but he refuses to go to the Rubber Bowl. We need a new stadium NOW. I don't know how much longer I can take going out to that dump and have the team lose. It would be easy to swallow if the stadium was in a decent part of town and I did not have to walk through mud to get to my car after the game.

No.

The Horseshoe was contracted by the University and built by qualified contractors. The Rubber Bowl was a WPA project during the 1930's built by a bunch of guys who were wondering what to do with the hillside they created from the dirt from building the runway. Private employees build the horseshoe, public employees built the Rubber Bowl. I'm surprised the Rubber Bowl has lasted this long. Wrecking ball please.

Did you also say to yourself, "Self, how come every bobble head doll looks the same?"

As confident as I was last week that we would get blown out, I am that confident this week we will win. Lee Corso has been talking all year about that "somebody" who picks games in Las Vegas. Akron is favored by nine points by "somebody" in Vegas this week and I'm going with that "somebody". The gambling experts have too much information after six games to get things wrong. Our offense continues to struggle and the defense or special teams scores one of the touchdowns. Akron wins 20-10.

I think the University would like to keep the City out of it if they can. If the City gives money, they can have more of a say over where, what the stadium will be. If called upon, I do think the City will respond favorably. The economic boost to the city would be good if they would use the stadium more than just for football. For example, how about some of the summer concerts that go to Blossom? Blossom really does not like to host many of the concerts they do and UA could benefit from it. Big stadium=big crowd=more money=big acts wanting to play the venue to make more money. The University must use a stadium to make money with higher education funding now being what it is.

The land is bought. My understanding is the sewer and water system around the area they want to build on can not support a stadium and they will have to pay to have that redone prior to buildiing a stadium. It would take over a year and a half to do that. That would put us into 2008 before they could start the new stadium. No way is there a stadium this decade. I would like to hear what the mayor has to say about this. If they build a stadium with bars around the stadium, it could hurt the businesses on Main Street. I wonder if they mayor does not want that to happen. One consideration has been having a bar IN the stadium that can be entered from the outside. That would be real nice. I would bet the University does not make an official statement about a new stadium until next fall. Still a long way to go.