Hilltopper Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 My source tells me that the depth chart looks like this;#1 Chris Jacquemain#2 Matt Rodgers#3 Kade Wagner#4 KC Patterson#5 Jordan MillerI don't care who, but one of these guys needs to step up in the next week and take command of the position. Another year of poor quarterbacking and JD will be packing his bags. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachTheZip Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 My source tells me that the depth chart looks like this;#1 Chris Jacquemain#2 Matt Rodgers#3 Kade Wagner#4 KC Patterson#5 Jordan MillerI don't care who, but one of these guys needs to step up in the next week and take command of the position. Another year of poor quarterbacking and JD will be packing his bags. That looks about right... for now.Give it a week and a half, and we'll see if Rodgers or possibly even Jordan Miller will be able to make a push for the top. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GJGood Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 My source tells me that the depth chart looks like this;#1 Chris Jacquemain#2 Matt Rodgers#3 Kade Wagner#4 KC Patterson#5 Jordan MillerI don't care who, but one of these guys needs to step up in the next week and take command of the position. Another year of poor quarterbacking and JD will be packing his bags. That looks about right... for now.Give it a week and a half, and we'll see if Rodgers or possibly even Jordan Miller will be able to make a push for the top.I guess I am surprised to see Wagner ahead of Patterson. I haven't followed it that closely but I remember hearing a lot of good things about Patterson last year at this time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Kangaroo Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 I heard that KC Patterson decided to hang up the cleats and focus on his degree. I wish him the best. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#1 rowdy Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 First off KC Patterson was not very good. They didn't even allow him to run Scout team QB because he wasn't good enough. Also I wouldn't get any hopes up for Jordan Miller because Freshman QB's rarely are ready and need to have a red shit year to learn the system. Plus i've heard that he isn't very good anyways. That leaves us with Jac, Rodgers, and Wagner. I would say its a 2 man race between Rodgers and Jac. But imo JAC will be the starter and remain the starter unless he gets hurt before game 1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quickzips Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 The person under center really isn't going to matter much if they don't fit the scheme we run. I'm still convinced that part of the problem with Jacq is that he's a horrible fit in the offense we run. He's a drop back, down field passer that we've been forcing to run rollouts and make lateral throws. It's like trying to hammer a square peg into a round hole. Would he be a good QB if we played a scheme more to his strength? Who knows. But I bet he would at least be better than he is in our current scheme. As for Rodgers and Wagner and the rest, I don't really know enough about them yet to know if they fit into our scheme or not.What I wouldn't give to see us line up in a standard I formation and start pounding the ball with our bumper crop of RB's, forcing the defense to bring 8 men into the box and setting up playaction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckzip Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 The person under center really isn't going to matter much if they don't fit the scheme we run. I'm still convinced that part of the problem with Jacq is that he's a horrible fit in the offense we run. He's a drop back, down field passer that we've been forcing to run rollouts and make lateral throws. It's like trying to hammer a square peg into a round hole. Would he be a good QB if we played a scheme more to his strength? Who knows. But I bet he would at least be better than he is in our current scheme. As for Rodgers and Wagner and the rest, I don't really know enough about them yet to know if they fit into our scheme or not.What I wouldn't give to see us line up in a standard I formation and start pounding the ball with our bumper crop of RB's, forcing the defense to bring 8 men into the box and setting up playaction.That is part of the problem. We don't really have a scheme for any QB to run. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue & Gold Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 The person under center really isn't going to matter much if they don't fit the scheme we run. I'm still convinced that part of the problem with Jacq is that he's a horrible fit in the offense we run. He's a drop back, down field passer that we've been forcing to run rollouts and make lateral throws. It's like trying to hammer a square peg into a round hole. Would he be a good QB if we played a scheme more to his strength? Who knows. But I bet he would at least be better than he is in our current scheme. As for Rodgers and Wagner and the rest, I don't really know enough about them yet to know if they fit into our scheme or not.What I wouldn't give to see us line up in a standard I formation and start pounding the ball with our bumper crop of RB's, forcing the defense to bring 8 men into the box and setting up playaction.That is part of the problem. We don't really have a scheme for any QB to run.Ouch. Sadly, that's sure what it looked like last season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.