K92 Posted September 13, 2010 Report Posted September 13, 2010 I say 35-0. Doesn't look good, seeing how UK beat WKU 63-28. Do you think we could beat WKU? It appears we may have the better defense and they have the better offense. It will be interesting to see how the Hilltoppers do against Indiana Saturday. Quote
K92 Posted September 14, 2010 Report Posted September 14, 2010 I say 35-0. Doesn't look good, seeing how UK beat WKU 63-28. Do you think we could beat WKU? It appears we may have the better defense and they have the better offense. It will be interesting to see how the Hilltoppers do against Indiana Saturday. I am still guilty of being too optimistic at 35-0, aren't I? Quote
Zipgrad01 Posted September 14, 2010 Report Posted September 14, 2010 I say 35-0. Doesn't look good, seeing how UK beat WKU 63-28. Do you think we could beat WKU? It appears we may have the better defense and they have the better offense. It will be interesting to see how the Hilltoppers do against Indiana Saturday. I am still guilty of being too optimistic at 35-0, aren't I? 55-0 Kentucky Quote
ZachTheZip Posted September 14, 2010 Report Posted September 14, 2010 I say 35-0. Doesn't look good, seeing how UK beat WKU 63-28. Do you think we could beat WKU? It appears we may have the better defense and they have the better offense. It will be interesting to see how the Hilltoppers do against Indiana Saturday. I am still guilty of being too optimistic at 35-0, aren't I? Not if you're predicting the score after the first quarter. Quote
GP1 Posted September 14, 2010 Report Posted September 14, 2010 I say KY doesn't beat them as bad as they could. They rest their starters in the second half and call off the dogs. ESPN Radio today in Columbia had a SEC show...they made fun of KY for playing Akron. Kentucky 56 Akron 3 Quote
GP1 Posted September 14, 2010 Report Posted September 14, 2010 I say 35-0. Doesn't look good, seeing how UK beat WKU 63-28. Do you think we could beat WKU? It appears we may have the better defense and they have the better offense. It will be interesting to see how the Hilltoppers do against Indiana Saturday. I am still guilty of being too optimistic at 35-0, aren't I? 55-0 Kentucky 7 X 8 = 56, not 55....unless you think they will score on the last play of the game and not try the PAT. Quote
InTheZone Posted September 14, 2010 Author Report Posted September 14, 2010 I say 35-0. Doesn't look good, seeing how UK beat WKU 63-28. Do you think we could beat WKU? It appears we may have the better defense and they have the better offense. It will be interesting to see how the Hilltoppers do against Indiana Saturday. I am still guilty of being too optimistic at 35-0, aren't I? 55-0 Kentucky 7 X 8 = 56, not 55....unless you think they will score on the last play of the game and not try the PAT. Maybe they'll kick two field goals at some point to give their PK a little practice. Quote
K92 Posted September 14, 2010 Report Posted September 14, 2010 I say 35-0. Doesn't look good, seeing how UK beat WKU 63-28. Do you think we could beat WKU? It appears we may have the better defense and they have the better offense. It will be interesting to see how the Hilltoppers do against Indiana Saturday. I am still guilty of being too optimistic at 35-0, aren't I? 55-0 Kentucky 7 X 8 = 56, not 55....unless you think they will score on the last play of the game and not try the PAT. 55 points gets scored lots of times. It's called 7 touchdowns and 2 field goals. Quote
UAZipster0305 Posted September 14, 2010 Report Posted September 14, 2010 I say 35-0. Doesn't look good, seeing how UK beat WKU 63-28. Do you think we could beat WKU? It appears we may have the better defense and they have the better offense. It will be interesting to see how the Hilltoppers do against Indiana Saturday. I am still guilty of being too optimistic at 35-0, aren't I? 55-0 Kentucky 7 X 8 = 56, not 55....unless you think they will score on the last play of the game and not try the PAT. Maybe they'll kick two field goals at some point to give their PK a little practice. Or maybe they will want to get their kickoff kicker a bit more practice and kickoff to start both halves. Quote
RowdyZip Posted September 14, 2010 Report Posted September 14, 2010 Line says Kentucky -24.5 right now, if I were a bettin' man (which I am), I'd take that one in a heartbeat. Unless the score is 24-0, Kentucky covers that. Quote
Zipgrad1990 Posted September 14, 2010 Report Posted September 14, 2010 I say 35-0. Doesn't look good, seeing how UK beat WKU 63-28. Do you think we could beat WKU? It appears we may have the better defense and they have the better offense. It will be interesting to see how the Hilltoppers do against Indiana Saturday. WKU is in the ESPN bottom 10 at number 1 after week one. Wonder if the Zips can take their spot away? My brother went to WKU, so now the two of us can see who has the worst FBS schools of 2010. Too bad they don't play each other to see, but I think Akron has better talent and of course WKU MUST have a better coach. My prediction based on what WKU did against UK: UK - 63 against WKU, I'll pick 56 against Akron. WKU - 28 against UK, I'll pick 13 for Akron (2 TDs, 1 missed PAT, plus 2 missed field goals). Based on the scores I came up with, WKU is slightly better than UA. I'd take UK and the points too, its a shame I'm not in Vegas to place that bet! Quote
MDZip Posted September 14, 2010 Report Posted September 14, 2010 I think the guys suck it up a little after their embarrassment last week. They won't win but they won't look completely pathetic. 38-14. Quote
InTheZone Posted September 14, 2010 Author Report Posted September 14, 2010 I think the guys suck it up a little after their embarrassment last week. They won't win but they won't look completely pathetic. 38-14. You give them way too much credit in thinking they actually care. I didn't see any evidence of that last week. Keep cashin those scholarship checks... Quote
RootforRoo44 Posted September 14, 2010 Report Posted September 14, 2010 35-17...it's about time we bust out a little bit offensively. Nate Burney and AA looked pretty good at times saturday and i think they will have decent success against a middle of the pack run defense. Btw, our defense isn't horrible so 35 points shouldn't be too hard eh? Quote
GoZips88 Posted September 14, 2010 Report Posted September 14, 2010 52-3 Kentucky. Will show up at #2 on ESPN's Bottom 10. Quote
Zipsrifle Posted September 14, 2010 Report Posted September 14, 2010 UK 54, UA 0. We miss 5 field goals. Quote
InTheZone Posted September 14, 2010 Author Report Posted September 14, 2010 35-17...it's about time we bust out a little bit offensively. Nate Burney and AA looked pretty good at times saturday and i think they will have decent success against a middle of the pack run defense. Btw, our defense isn't horrible so 35 points shouldn't be too hard eh? Kentucky is middle of the road SEC. That means conference powerhouse anywhere else. Our D gave up 31 in regulation to Gardner-Webb. Kentucky will probably score 31 in the 1st quarter if they want to. Quote
Zipmeister Posted September 14, 2010 Report Posted September 14, 2010 I say 35-0. Doesn't look good, seeing how UK beat WKU 63-28. Do you think we could beat WKU? It appears we may have the better defense and they have the better offense. It will be interesting to see how the Hilltoppers do against Indiana Saturday. WKU is in the ESPN bottom 10 at number 1 after week one. Wonder if the Zips can take their spot away? My brother went to WKU, so now the two of us can see who has the worst FBS schools of 2010. Too bad they don't play each other to see, but I think Akron has better talent and of course WKU MUST have a better coach. My prediction based on what WKU did against UK: UK - 63 against WKU, I'll pick 56 against Akron. WKU - 28 against UK, I'll pick 13 for Akron (2 TDs, 1 missed PAT, plus 2 missed field goals). Based on the scores I came up with, WKU is slightly better than UA. I'd take UK and the points too, its a shame I'm not in Vegas to place that bet! We will have to learn you about the Internet some day. Zips pull off a major upset: 24-10. Quote
InTheZone Posted September 14, 2010 Author Report Posted September 14, 2010 We will have to learn you about the Internet some day. Zips pull off a major upset: 24-10. That wouldn't be an upset, that'd be a divine act of God. Quote
RootforRoo44 Posted September 14, 2010 Report Posted September 14, 2010 We will have to learn you about the Internet some day. Zips pull off a major upset: 24-10. That wouldn't be an upset, that'd be a divine act of God. Well good news: GOD IS A ZIPS FAN Quote
GP1 Posted September 14, 2010 Report Posted September 14, 2010 35-17...it's about time we bust out a little bit offensively. Many would read this and not see the sarcasm. I think it is funny. Nice work. Our offense had 31 points at the end of the 3rd quarter. What that tells me is they can score points....a big concern of mine after only putting up 3 against Syracuse. Against a I-AA team they should have had 45 at the end of the game. I could care less what happens against KY and IN. I still think this team can win. They need to get their heads out of their butts at crunch time and play well. The MAC schedule is just around the corner. Let's see how they do. They need to execute when it matters. Quote
GP1 Posted September 14, 2010 Report Posted September 14, 2010 35-17...it's about time we bust out a little bit offensively. Nate Burney and AA looked pretty good at times saturday and i think they will have decent success against a middle of the pack run defense. Btw, our defense isn't horrible so 35 points shouldn't be too hard eh? Kentucky is middle of the road SEC. That means conference powerhouse anywhere else. Our D gave up 31 in regulation to Gardner-Webb. Kentucky will probably score 31 in the 1st quarter if they want to. Just to add a little to this. KY also has played two games so it isn't like we can sneak up on them in week 1 when some of their new starters don't have any experience. Quote
skip-zip Posted September 14, 2010 Report Posted September 14, 2010 Kentucky is much better than Syracuse, I'm afraid. Ouch. I'm guessing Kentucky will score on roughly 2/3 of their possessions, and 2/3 of those scores will be TDs. We'll get a couple of scores on their defense, but I think they might be later in the game. Kentucky 41-13 (Akron misses a short field goal and an extra point) Quote
Buckzip Posted September 14, 2010 Report Posted September 14, 2010 Kentucky 49-0. It's 42-0 after the 3rd quarter and then KU puts in their 4th string for the 4th quarter and they score another TD and are on the verge of another but have mercy and take 4 straight knees at the Zips 1 yardline with Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.