zipboy Posted November 24, 2010 Report Share Posted November 24, 2010 I don't think the coach is removing only the dead weight, but also quality student-athletes in order to free up scholarships for recruiting, even though he hasn't proven that he can recruit any semblance of talent to a school like Akron. How do you sell a recruit on joining a team and playing under a coach who might at any moment go back on his promise and take away your scholarship? It doesn't look trustworthy and it sends a message to potential recruits that he's not a good enough coach to win with players that aren't perfectly suited to his system. Many more defections are to come after Friday's game. Zach, we already have slots well over the max allowed of 25 available next year and I believe the following year as well. Guys may be run off or leave on their own accord, but I can't see why Ianello would need to run anyone else for scholarships. At this point, he needs bodies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zipmeister Posted November 24, 2010 Report Share Posted November 24, 2010 I don't think the coach is removing only the dead weight, but also quality student-athletes in order to free up scholarships for recruiting, even though he hasn't proven that he can recruit any semblance of talent to a school like Akron. How do you sell a recruit on joining a team and playing under a coach who might at any moment go back on his promise and take away your scholarship? It doesn't look trustworthy and it sends a message to potential recruits that he's not a good enough coach to win with players that aren't perfectly suited to his system. Many more defections are to come after Friday's game. Zach, we already have slots well over the max allowed of 25 available next year and I believe the following year as well. Guys may be run off or leave on their own accord, but I can't see why Ianello would need to run anyone else for scholarships. At this point, he needs bodies. Zipboy, we generally don't make Zach think...it gets in the way of the rambling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachTheZip Posted December 20, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 20, 2010 You probably didn't follow this, but the Syracuse coach released far more players when he first arrived than was necessary to have a full recruiting class. By the start of his second season, he was down to around 50 scholarship players (Yes, the start of that second season, which began at the Info. We lost to a team that had less than an FCS teams worth of scholarships.). Why did he do it even after passing the max recruit limit for open scholarships? Because he wanted to weed out players who weren't performing to his expectations. This could be what Ianello's idea is here. Does anybody know if any more players left the team after the season ended? Or why we're even kicking players off the team who haven't even stepped on campus yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckzip Posted December 20, 2010 Report Share Posted December 20, 2010 You probably didn't follow this, but the Syracuse coach released far more players when he first arrived than was necessary to have a full recruiting class. By the start of his second season, he was down to around 50 scholarship players (Yes, the start of that second season, which began at the Info. We lost to a team that had less than an FCS teams worth of scholarships.). Why did he do it even after passing the max recruit limit for open scholarships? Because he wanted to weed out players who weren't performing to his expectations. This could be what Ianello's idea is here. Does anybody know if any more players left the team after the season ended? Or why we're even kicking players off the team who haven't even stepped on campus yet? Your link is a pay site. What are you saying here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachTheZip Posted December 20, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 20, 2010 You probably didn't follow this, but the Syracuse coach released far more players when he first arrived than was necessary to have a full recruiting class. By the start of his second season, he was down to around 50 scholarship players (Yes, the start of that second season, which began at the Info. We lost to a team that had less than an FCS teams worth of scholarships.). Why did he do it even after passing the max recruit limit for open scholarships? Because he wanted to weed out players who weren't performing to his expectations. This could be what Ianello's idea is here. Does anybody know if any more players left the team after the season ended? Or why we're even kicking players off the team who haven't even stepped on campus yet? Your link is a pay site. What are you saying here? I'm saying that a day after one of our recruits verbally committed, his scholarship offer was pulled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave in Green Posted December 20, 2010 Report Share Posted December 20, 2010 Hopefully any Zips scholarship offer that might be pulled is due to having a higher level player commit for that scholarship. In the musical chairs game of teams looking to land the best players and players looking to land with the best teams, someone always gets caught out when the music stops. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckzip Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 Hopefully any Zips scholarship offer that might be pulled is due to having a higher level player commit for that scholarship. In the musical chairs game of teams looking to land the best players and players looking to land with the best teams, someone always gets caught out when the music stops. It is bad to pull a scholly after a verbal is issued. That can hurt recruiting in the future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xu9697 Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 Hopefully any Zips scholarship offer that might be pulled is due to having a higher level player commit for that scholarship. In the musical chairs game of teams looking to land the best players and players looking to land with the best teams, someone always gets caught out when the music stops. It is bad to pull a scholly after a verbal is issued. That can hurt recruiting in the future. Agree completely. Hopefully this was not the scenario that played out with this kid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Kangaroo Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 Hopefully any Zips scholarship offer that might be pulled is due to having a higher level player commit for that scholarship. In the musical chairs game of teams looking to land the best players and players looking to land with the best teams, someone always gets caught out when the music stops. It is bad to pull a scholly after a verbal is issued. That can hurt recruiting in the future. It could be that the kid did something that merited pulling the scholarship? Since it happened at the end of the semester, poor grades are a strong possibility. Over the past few years I know of several recruits (various sports) that were dropped because their fall HS grades dipped below UA's requirements. For an Eric Howard, you might make an exception. For a 5' 10" LB, you wish him well and move on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckzip Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 Hopefully any Zips scholarship offer that might be pulled is due to having a higher level player commit for that scholarship. In the musical chairs game of teams looking to land the best players and players looking to land with the best teams, someone always gets caught out when the music stops. It is bad to pull a scholly after a verbal is issued. That can hurt recruiting in the future. It could be that the kid did something that merited pulling the scholarship? Since it happened at the end of the semester, poor grades are a strong possibility. Over the past few years I know of several recruits (various sports) that were dropped because their fall HS grades dipped below UA's requirements. For an Eric Howard, you might make an exception. For a 5' 10" LB, you wish him well and move on. Grades are a different story. Certain schools offer based on grades being achieved. I understand that. But if they are pullling for any reason other than grades or legal issues, it could really be a negative for future recruiting. Even an injury, unless it's career ending, is not a good thing. Never, ever pull a scholly because someone better came along. That is something that would get around to every recruit Akron is going after. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaxZIP Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 Grades are a different story. Certain schools offer based on grades being achieved. I understand that. But if they are pullling for any reason other than grades or legal issues, it could really be a negative for future recruiting. Even an injury, unless it's career ending, is not a good thing. Never, ever pull a scholly because someone better came along. That is something that would get around to every recruit Akron is going after. Do you know what is a real negative for future recruiting? Losing. Do whatever it takes to get better players even if some feelings get hurt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave in Green Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 No team can offer only the exact number of players they want, because some of those players are going to go elsewhere. Say a team needs a fullback. They offer 4 or 5 fullbacks hoping to get 1 or 2. Once 1 or 2 commit, the offers are pulled for the 3 or 4 who were slow to commit. Obviously there are many different reasons why a team will pull an offer or a recruit will verbal and then change his mind. It's purely speculative to try to guess on a sports forum what may have happened. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaxZIP Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 I think they pulled the offer because he is shrinking. He is now listed on ESPN.Com as being 5'9" 202. He probably is more in the range of 5'8" 190 as a LB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckzip Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 No team can offer only the exact number of players they want, because some of those players are going to go elsewhere. Say a team needs a fullback. They offer 4 or 5 fullbacks hoping to get 1 or 2. Once 1 or 2 commit, the offers are pulled for the 3 or 4 who were slow to commit. Obviously there are many different reasons why a team will pull an offer or a recruit will verbal and then change his mind. It's purely speculative to try to guess on a sports forum what may have happened. I'm saying don't pull an offer after the player has commited. It is very common to pull offers before that. If you need 3 LB's, you may offer 7. You take the first 3 that commit. Everyone does that type of thing. No team offers the exact number of schollies as they do spots available. Well, maybe the SEC teams because they seem to sign 30 every year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckzip Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 I think they pulled the offer because he is shrinking. He is now listed on ESPN.Com as being 5'9" 202. He probably is more in the range of 5'8" 190 as a LB. Great to think that the staff didn't scout the guy and see him first hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Kangaroo Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 Just out of curiosity...has a player ever backed out of a verbal? Said he was going to play for one school, then dumped them on signing day for another school? Bet is never has happened. If this kid is any good, and has no troubles with grades or the police, Ianello did him a big favor by pulling the plug in mid-December. He has PLENTY of time to latch-on elsewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Zip Posted December 28, 2010 Report Share Posted December 28, 2010 I don't see this "plan" yielding a 6-6 record. It's either insane, and we are going 4-32 over the next three seasons. Or the guy is a genius, and we're in a bowl in 2013. It's going to be one or the other. I with you. The only thing I can hang my hat of hope on now is the fact that the Miamioh coach won one game last year and may very well go to a bowl this season. Patience... "please let these people realize how foolish this impatient mindset is, and convince them to give Ianello a fighting chance to succeed." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachTheZip Posted December 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2010 I don't see this "plan" yielding a 6-6 record. It's either insane, and we are going 4-32 over the next three seasons. Or the guy is a genius, and we're in a bowl in 2013. It's going to be one or the other. I with you. The only thing I can hang my hat of hope on now is the fact that the Miamioh coach won one game last year and may very well go to a bowl this season. Patience... "please let these people realize how foolish this impatient mindset is, and convince them to give Ianello a fighting chance to succeed." "Was Ianello really expected to turn things around and compete for a conference championship in his first year?" Yes. Yes he was. At least according to our AD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zipmeister Posted December 28, 2010 Report Share Posted December 28, 2010 Just out of curiosity...has a player ever backed out of a verbal? Said he was going to play for one school, then dumped them on signing day for another school? Bet is never has happened. If this kid is any good, and has no troubles with grades or the police, Ianello did him a big favor by pulling the plug in mid-December. He has PLENTY of time to latch-on elsewhere. I checked this out pretty thoroughly and it turns out it has only happened twice. Once, in 1950, by a guy who had verballed to Marquette. This event so shook the Warriors program that they subsequently dropped football and changed their nickname and mascot. The other occurred in 1943 by a guy who had verballed to Northern Kentucky. Instead he went to the Air Force Academy and later dropped an atomic bomb on Japan. The NK football program survived. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachTheZip Posted January 31, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2011 The 2011 roster is now up on GoZips.com, but until the Spring Game I wouldn't count on it for reliability. It appears they just took last years roster minus the seniors and put it up. Couple players who left are still listed, and some new ones aren't on it yet. Out of the 66 current players 32 are sophomores, 15 are juniors, and 19 are seniors. No freshmen or incoming JUCOs are added yet as we're probably waiting for Signing Day to announce them. This might be the youngest team in the nation this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachTheZip Posted February 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2011 Seems like some more players are transferring out. It will be interesting when the spring game roster comes out. CB Randy Greenwood has left the team and is looking to transfer CB Nate Vidmar has left the team FB James Heiss is transferring to IUPUI LB Nolan Plate is transferring to Dayton Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Z.I.P. Posted February 18, 2011 Report Share Posted February 18, 2011 The 2011 roster is now up on GoZips.com, but until the Spring Game I wouldn't count on it for reliability. It appears they just took last years roster minus the seniors and put it up. Couple players who left are still listed, and some new ones aren't on it yet. Out of the 66 current players 32 are sophomores, 15 are juniors, and 19 are seniors. No freshmen or incoming JUCOs are added yet as we're probably waiting for Signing Day to announce them. This might be the youngest team in the nation this season. This is interesting! I remember back in (was it?) 2005, the year Akron was the only bowl eligible team left out of a bowl game, I checked it out then and as I recall we had 75 sophomores and freshmen on the roster. The only FBS school that came close to that was UCF with 72. Are we starting all over again? Do I need to ask this question? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GP1 Posted February 18, 2011 Report Share Posted February 18, 2011 Are we starting all over again? Do I need to ask this question? We never stop building all over again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Kangaroo Posted February 18, 2011 Report Share Posted February 18, 2011 Seems like some more players are transferring out. It will be interesting when the spring game roster comes out. CB Randy Greenwood has left the team and is looking to transfer CB Nate Vidmar has left the team FB James Heiss is transferring to IUPUI LB Nolan Plate is transferring to Dayton Plate, Heiss and Vidmar - No one cares. Greenwood is a disappointing loss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachTheZip Posted February 18, 2011 Author Report Share Posted February 18, 2011 Seems like some more players are transferring out. It will be interesting when the spring game roster comes out. CB Randy Greenwood has left the team and is looking to transfer CB Nate Vidmar has left the team FB James Heiss is transferring to IUPUI LB Nolan Plate is transferring to Dayton Plate, Heiss and Vidmar - No one cares. Greenwood is a disappointing loss. All four are disappointing. We simply don't have the depth to sustain losses like this. We don't even have an FCS number of scholarship players and we're losing them at a rate faster than recruiting can replace thanks to the 25-person limit on signing classes. I don't know, maybe it's Ianello's goal to cut the roster down to NFL size. He's going to leave the team in even worse shape than Brookhart did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.