johnnyzip84 Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 Since GP1 was curious about how Faust’s win graph might appear, I decided to make this into a game of sorts. First, here is Paul Winters win graph at Wayne State, since this is what prompted the curiosity in the first place. The next 5 replies are 5 additional graphs for UA “Coach 1” through “Coach 5”. I have deliberately left off the years along the bottom axis to make it (slightly) harder to guess. Have at it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyzip84 Posted December 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 Coach 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyzip84 Posted December 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 Coach 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyzip84 Posted December 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 Coach 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyzip84 Posted December 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 Coach 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyzip84 Posted December 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 I saved the best for last. Coach 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue & Gold Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 What would Ianello's graph look like? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mes102 Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 What would Ianello's graph look like? Pretty sure it's on here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue & Gold Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 What would Ianello's graph look like? Pretty sure it's on here Oops, I posted too soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbozeglav Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 #3 Has to be JD Brookhart, #5 is just too obvious... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyzip84 Posted December 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 #3 Has to be JD Brookhart, #5 is just too obvious... 2 for 2! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbozeglav Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 #1 must be Owens Ill leave the other two for everyone else. Im pretty confident i know what #2 is.... #4 is still throwing me off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyzip84 Posted December 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 #1 must be Owens Ill leave the other two for everyone else. Im pretty confident i know what #2 is.... #4 is still throwing me off. Correct! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachTheZip Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 #1 must be Owens Ill leave the other two for everyone else. Im pretty confident i know what #2 is.... #4 is still throwing me off. #4 is Jim Dennison. Who else ever had a 10-win season at Akron? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UADavid Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 I saved the best for last. Coach 5 Now that's the textbook example of flatlining. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyzip84 Posted December 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 #1 must be Owens Ill leave the other two for everyone else. Im pretty confident i know what #2 is.... #4 is still throwing me off. #4 is Jim Dennison. Who else ever had a 10-win season at Akron? Bingo! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyzip84 Posted December 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 I saved the best for last. Coach 5 Now that's the textbook example of flatlining. You said it! That very term kept jumping out at me when I was creating the graph. DOA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDZip Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 Only 5 coaches in almost 40 years. You'd think we'd be the model of consistency. Well at least iCoach was. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g-mann17 Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 Only 5 coaches in almost 40 years. You'd think we'd be the model of consistency. Well at least iCoach was. We are the model of consistency, consistantly inconsistant. Also a very telling indicator is that the mean across all coaches over the the last 40 years has been between 5-6 wins. (Minus the outlier that was I-Coach). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zipsfan33 Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 I like the way Owens looked... I wish we were at InfoCision for his reign! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug Snyder Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 I saved the best for last. Coach 5 Now that's the textbook example of flatlining. I don't mind flatlining. at 11-1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hilltopper Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 Coach 1 Lee Owens Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hilltopper Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 Coach 2 Gerry faust Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hilltopper Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 Coach 3 JD Brookhart Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hilltopper Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 Coach 4 Jim Dennison Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.