GoZips Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 There is a certain faction within UA across a broad swath of the institution that, for whatever reason, has made it their mission to sabotage anything related to athletics. At universities like OU and Can't, they have outspoken professors and others who complain to the media, stage open protests, and other things to let the world know their views on athletics. At Akron, they stay silent, but work their influences to screw us over. They do not share President Proenza's belief that athletics is like the front porch of a university. They dismiss the effect it can have on alumni interest, or long for the good old days of being D-III with no scholarships granted based on athletic ability. We've got a problem at Akron and the current focus appears to be on the basketball program because football did a great job of destroying itself without their intervention and soccer is untouchable thanks to strong academics and a coach who intimidates them. This is as good an explanation as anyone could give. Non-athletics people are doing their best to screw with the workings of the athletic programs. Right now the target seems to be men's basketball because it has been successful Stay tuned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RootforRoo44 Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 Or maybe they're just too busy playing Halo 4. I'll allow it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LZIp Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 This is as good an explanation as anyone could give. Non-athletics people are doing their best to screw with the workings of the athletic programs. Right now the target seems to be men's basketball because it has been successful Stay tuned. they are targeting the basketball team because they are successful? give me a break. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachTheZip Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 they are targeting the basketball team because they are successful? give me a break. Success means we're less likely to scale back our athletics program. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GP1 Posted November 8, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 Sounds like nobody really knows why the players may or may not be at CCU so this is just a general comment. There always have been and there always will be professors who stage protests because they believe their University spends too much money on sports. It goes on everywhere. For the most part, they are probably right if they believe big time college athletics are contrary to the mission of a university. They are, but I still like them and will continue to follow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zipmeister Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 This is as good an explanation as anyone could give. Non-athletics people are doing their best to screw with the workings of the athletic programs. Right now the target seems to be men's basketball because it has been successful Stay tuned. OK some of you may think Zach and Go are nuts, but I know for a fact that they are correct because I have seen the up-to-no-gooders they are referring to riding around in silent helicopters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zen Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 OK some of you may think Zach and Go are nuts, but I know for a fact that they are correct because I have seen the up-to-no-gooders they are referring to riding around in silent helicopters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave in Green Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 LOL..really wondering what these "technical difficulties" are. My guess is that is has something to do with the Q incident, seeing that both of them were there. No. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gcc Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 No. Thanks Dave! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LZIp Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 Sounds like nobody really knows why the players may or may not be at CCU so this is just a general comment. There always have been and there always will be professors who stage protests because they believe their University spends too much money on sports. It goes on everywhere. For the most part, they are probably right if they believe big time college athletics are contrary to the mission of a university. They are, but I still like them and will continue to follow. I can agree with that..but what does it have to do with specifically Tree and Harney, especially if they are at "no fault"? And why can't anybody spill the beans if they really know what is going on? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 I can agree with that..but what does it have to do with specifically Tree and Harney, especially if they are at "no fault"? And why can't anybody spill the beans if they really know what is going on? Is it the 'student' part of 'student-athlete'? Are they unable to make the trip because of exams that couldn't be rescheduled or something? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zen Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 Is it the 'student' part of 'student-athlete'? Are they unable to make the trip because of exams that couldn't be rescheduled or something? This was my guess. Sometimes Profs can't always bend or accommodate due to circumstances, and afterall, a class is class. But if they are being hard-ons for the sake of stubbornness and resentment, I hope they are at the top of their field and difficult to replace. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LZIp Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 Is it the 'student' part of 'student-athlete'? Are they unable to make the trip because of exams that couldn't be rescheduled or something? Thanks. This never crossed my mind, because I know several student athletes, and have never heard of this being an issue before. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mivid12 Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 If professor poindexter pocket protector is being deliberatly vindictive toward an athlete just b/c of who he is, then said pocket protector should be fired (or lose tenure) or at the very least reprimaned/suspended. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hilltopper Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 This was my guess. Sometimes Profs can't always bend or accommodate due to circumstances, and afterall, a class is class. But if they are being hard-ons for the sake of stubbornness and resentment, I hope they are at the top of their field and difficult to replace. No again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CincyZip Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 ^^^ I thought that was going to be it... I am surprised that our friends in Carolina figured out our dirty secret about Walsh. How we made up the MAC 4th team last season to intimidate future opponents. I guess now they will leave Walsh open, particularly behind the three point line. Dang it, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave in Green Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 ..... And why can't anybody spill the beans if they really know what is going on? Anyone who had the facts shared with them in confidence would no longer be considered trustworthy if they spilled the beans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valpo Zip Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 Is it the 'student' part of 'student-athlete'? Are they unable to make the trip because of exams that couldn't be rescheduled or something? That can't be it. There is no such a thing as an exam that can't be re-scheduled. Unexcused absence may lead to class failure but excused absence may not. If you're in the hospital or had a court date, you won't fail. Next question is: what is an excused absence? and I can report to you that in my DIII school, athletic commitment IS an excused absence and it is documented in the books whether professors like it or not... so it better be in a DI school like Akron. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LZIp Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 Anyone who had the facts shared with them in confidence would no longer be considered trustworthy if they spilled the beans. How about...what is the big deal that we cant disclose the "facts"? If it isnt what previous posters have mentioned, I have a hard time believing the situation was not in the control of Harney and Tree. Mainly because I cannot think of any reasons that dont seem like complete BS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachTheZip Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 Mainly because I cannot think of any reasons that dont seem like complete BS. Now you're starting to get it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyzip84 Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 At this point, I’m not really concerned about WHY Tree and Nick won’t play tomorrow night. I’m far more concerned over HOW the Zips perform without them. Coastal has been a consistently good program, they are picked by many to represent the Big South in the 2013 NCAA Tourney, AND they’re opening up their brand new (though small) gym. If Alex isn’t near 100% (or can’t play much), if the talented freshmen have many “deer in the headlights” moments, and/or if the refs in Conway decide to serve up the home cooking, this game could easily slip away from the talented Zips. I have a feeling Pat Forsythe might come up big to prevent that from happening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoZips Posted November 9, 2012 Report Share Posted November 9, 2012 How about...what is the big deal that we cant disclose the "facts"? If it isnt what previous posters have mentioned, I have a hard time believing the situation was not in the control of Harney and Tree. Mainly because I cannot think of any reasons that dont seem like complete BS. Neither Treadwell or Harney are guilty of anything; not even a hang nail. This issue is beyond their control. They are, frankly, victims. I suggest you leave it be and grumble at the non-basketball nerds who created the issue. And, yes, I know what is going on. And, no, I am not going to "spill the beans.' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LZIp Posted November 9, 2012 Report Share Posted November 9, 2012 Neither Treadwell or Harney are guilty of anything; not even a hang nail. This issue is beyond their control. They are, frankly, victims. I suggest you leave it be and grumble at the non-basketball nerds who created the issue. And, yes, I know what is going on. And, no, I am not going to "spill the beans.' Cant grumble at the "non-basketball" nerds if I dont know who they are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CincyZip Posted November 9, 2012 Report Share Posted November 9, 2012 I don't understand. If they are victims, shouldn't someone be protecting them instead of hiding the identity of their 'predators'? This has now gone beyond basketball. It is not fair for these guys, who have worked so hard to get to the place they are now, for someone to try to sabotage their career. I am very proud for what they have accomplished so far and am very upset that anyone would try to knock them off their pedestal. Hard work should be rewarded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LZIp Posted November 9, 2012 Report Share Posted November 9, 2012 I don't understand. If they are victims, shouldn't someone be protecting them instead of hiding the identity of their 'predators'? This has now gone beyond basketball. It is not fair for these guys, who have worked so hard to get to the place they are now, for someone to try to sabotage their career. I am very proud for what they have accomplished so far and am very upset that anyone would try to knock them off their pedestal. Hard work should be rewarded. yeah I dont get it, but whatever. It sure would suck to start the season with a loss to Coastal Carolina. I think we will be fine, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.