Jump to content

Bold Prediction


akronzips71

Recommended Posts

Anyone who doesn't think the rest of the games aren't going to be getting tougher and tougher is just fooling themselves. Many times in history a team has finally pulled itself up to a top 25 ranking only to lose soon thereafter. What the Zips have already accomplished and what they're still in the process of accomplishing is darned difficult. There are 347 D-I teams fighting for 25 elite positions in the poll. At this level, it's no longer a game. It's cutthroat competition. It takes tremendous talent, toughness and tenacity to prevail. What's happened in the past is history. What may happen in the future is speculation. Past Zips teams have no bearing on what this team can accomplish. Either you believe that this team has more talent, toughness and tenacity than any previous Zips team or you don't. It's as simple as that.

Well said, Dave. I understand that the future is uncertain still but to say that I the past is applicable to the present would be foolish. No Zips team has ever broken the top 25. I believe this team has what it takes to keep winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone who doesn't think the rest of the games aren't going to be getting tougher and tougher is just fooling themselves. Many times in history a team has finally pulled itself up to a top 25 ranking only to lose soon thereafter. What the Zips have already accomplished and what they're still in the process of accomplishing is darned difficult. There are 347 D-I teams fighting for 25 elite positions in the poll. At this level, it's no longer a game. It's cutthroat competition. It takes tremendous talent, toughness and tenacity to prevail. What's happened in the past is history. What may happen in the future is speculation. Past Zips teams have no bearing on what this team can accomplish. Either you believe that this team has more talent, toughness and tenacity than any previous Zips team or you don't. It's as simple as that.

I honestly don't think this team has done anything to prove they are different than any previous Zips teams. Winning 12 MAC games? Beating a school from a major conference? Beat OhioU in Akron? Beat Can't? All Happened last year. We have 4 games left and can still finish with the same record in conference as last year. Yes 1-3 would be an awful finish, but it's happened before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This prediction (above) has one problem:

For us to get at-large, we'd have to lose one more game. And that would knock us out of Top-25 chances in both polls for the remainder of the year.

I disagree. If our only loss is the championship game and we are #22, I don't think there will be a top 25 impact at that point. Every team loses one sooner or later, and at that point there might not even be another poll before selection Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Zips win out but lose the MAC tournament championship game, it would be extremely iffy whether they'd hold on to the bottom of the top 25 or not. There are a lot of good teams hanging around the fringes, and it would come down to how a lot of other teams fared. I don't think it's a predictable outcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. If our only loss is the championship game and we are #22, I don't think there will be a top 25 impact at that point. Every team loses one sooner or later, and at that point there might not even be another poll before selection Sunday.

No way that we win 5 more games and only move up two spots. I'd expect around a #17 ranking or higher by that point. Teams in front of us losing, plus us adding more wins is good for a couple spots each week. Just win, baby!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is what I am taking about:

The MAC championship is March 16

Selection Sunday is March 17. Since there is no poll in between, whatever we go into Cleveland ranked at is what we are ranked at on Selection Sunday.

Therefore, if we go in #20, no matter what happens in Cleveland we go to Sunday #20

So the question for DIG is:

Has a Top 25 team EVER been denied a ticket to the dance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly don't think this team has done anything to prove they are different than any previous Zips teams. Winning 12 MAC games? Beating a school from a major conference? Beat OhioU in Akron? Beat Can't? All Happened last year. We have 4 games left and can still finish with the same record in conference as last year. Yes 1-3 would be an awful finish, but it's happened before.

I bet you hate beer, steak & titties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is what I am taking about:

The MAC championship is March 16

Selection Sunday is March 17. Since there is no poll in between, whatever we go into Cleveland ranked at is what we are ranked at on Selection Sunday.

Therefore, if we go in #20, no matter what happens in Cleveland we go to Sunday #20

So the question for DIG is:

Has a Top 25 team EVER been denied a ticket to the dance?

in 2004, #25 Utah State was left out.

I believe #25 UNLV was left out sometime in the 90s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally had a chance to check, and @LZip is correct. Utah State was 25-2 in the 2003-2004 season before they lost their conference championship game. They were ranked in the low-20s of the top 25 in both the AP and Coaches polls, and had been for weeks. Despite finishing with a 25-3 record and being ranked in the top 25 in both polls, they were passed over by the selection committee. It caused quite a stir at the time as it was said to be the first time a top 25 team in both polls had ever been excluded. So I'm not sure that there was also a similar UNLV exclusion in the 90s. Bottom line for any team without a blue-blood pedigree is either win your conference's automatic bid or prepare to be subjected to the whims of the selection committee. It's a long shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally had a chance to check, and @LZip is correct. Utah State was 25-2 in the 2003-2004 season before they lost their conference championship game. They were ranked in the low-20s of the top 25 in both the AP and Coaches polls, and had been for weeks. Despite finishing with a 25-3 record and being ranked in the top 25 in both polls, they were passed over by the selection committee. It caused quite a stir at the time as it was said to be the first time a top 25 team in both polls had ever been excluded. So I'm not sure that there was also a similar UNLV exclusion in the 90s. Bottom line for any team without a blue-blood pedigree is either win your conference's automatic bid or prepare to be subjected to the whims of the selection committee. It's a long shot.

By long shot, you mean once ever? say teams ranked 20-25, so 6 teams per year, times how many years were at large picks selected? Wikipedia says 26 years of 64 teams, 10 with 65, and 2 with 68. So in the 38 years of 64+ team tournaments, one time has a ranked team been left out. That's 1 out of (38*6) 228 teams ranked 20-25 during those years. If we make it to the MAC title game still ranked (probably in the high teens by that point), we're in. No ifs ands or buts about it. Assuming of course we don't get our butts handed to us.

With that said, let's not dwell on plan B. Win em all and get a 7 or 8 seed :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@zippy5, you are making the assumption that all teams in the top 25s are created equal, as opposed to the assumption that the selection committee reserves the right to reject teams that inadvertently slip into the top 25 but have no history of deserving to belong there. Math alone is not applicable when it comes to the selection committee. You do know about the "eye test," right? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@zippy5, you are making the assumption that all teams in the top 25s are created equal, as opposed to the assumption that the selection committee reserves the right to reject teams that inadvertently slip into the top 25 but have no history of deserving to belong there. Math alone is not applicable when it comes to the selection committee. You do know about the "eye test," right? :)

Well then my friend, you are assuming that all top 25 teams are from the big conferences with that statement, since only one was left out. But yes, I hate their selective use of stats more than anyone. RPI, top 50 wins, away wins.. They'll pull out any of these stats if a mid major is lacking in one. I can't argue with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WHEN we win Saturday we will jump to at least #19.

The interesting scenario is this:

What if we win out, and lose the championship game at the Q to someone like Buffalo or WMU?

I think we still get the at large.

I think it's a lock. But like I said, if we're #19 next week, let's keep winning and take it all. Don't worry about plan B, let's get our 7 seed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...