Jump to content

Zips Need More Fans for New Arena


Blue & Gold

Recommended Posts

I said this two years ago in another thread:

The only way that a new arena is built is a local company with super deep pockets put up most(or all) of the money.

I don't see Goodyear(they are the only one left) pulling out the checkbook anytime soon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The U of A could put in the fold up back seats throughout the JAR, including the end zones. That would get rid of the bleacher wood seats. The end zone seats would remain the general admission seats. The fold up seats are much more comfortable and would make the JAR look a bit more official.

Seat back chairs certainty are more comfortable. Two problems with this. One, it further reduces the capacity; probably to

under five thousand. A huge negative if the Zips are trying to "sell" themselves to a higher level conference. And, let it be

known that the university is interested in going to a higher level conference. The second problem with the chair back seating

is that the current seats are old, cracked, damaged and would need to be totally replaced. That is a lot of money to pour in to

an old, ill designed rat hole. (ooops, is my skirt showing?)

The JAR is so poorly designed that the first two rows of floor level seating are neatly tucked under the moveable seats. Take a

look. Find rows A and B down at floor level. They are there alright. Still under row C. For several years I have had the same

seats in row E; the third row from the floor.

Ever need to visit a restroom while at a Zips game or other event? Ah ha, only one facility for men or women available to

most fans. These are located at the south end. True, there are tiny restrooms located inside the Tommy Evans Lounge

which most fans have no access to.

Now, officially the largest restrooms available to the public reside on the main concourse. Which, years ago they were to

service the patrons in the lower bowl. Along comes the University police and closes the corridors under the seating meant

to handle floor level traffic. Today, if you are seated in the lower bowl you get to climb several awkwardly designed steps

with no hand rails to get up to the race track and the one available restroom at that level.

An oft and over used trite commentary applys beautifully here: you can put lipstick on a pig.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The U of A could put in the fold up back seats throughout the JAR, including the end zones. That would get rid of the bleacher wood seats. The end zone seats would remain the general admission seats. The fold up seats are much more comfortable and would make the JAR look a bit more official.

According to the discussions I have had with internal people, the biggest concern would remain that you have to walk in front of seats (on the track). And in order to change that, seating would have to be reduced significantly to move the walking concourse to an area behind the seats. That's the Catch 22. In addition, there would still be no luxury areas (such as a lounge) from which to view the game, so finding a way to alter the lower level to provide that is a challenge as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ever need to visit a restroom while at a Zips game or other event? Ah ha, only one facility for men or women available to

most fans. These are located at the south end. True, there are tiny restrooms located inside the Tommy Evans Lounge

which most fans have no access to.

Those restrooms are not inside the Tommy Evans Lounge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said this two years ago in another thread:

The only way that a new arena is built is a local company with super deep pockets put up most(or all) of the money.

I don't see Goodyear(they are the only one left) pulling out the checkbook anytime soon

Where did Toledo, EMU, NIU, Ball U., Buffalo, OU, etc. get the money for their nice arenas? It would have been interesting if the ABJ had included this info when comparing the JAR with other MAC facilities..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea of increased attendance comes up all the time (me included) because this is the only thing we can do as fans that could influence and expedite a more immediate NEED for a new arena for UA basketball.

How about stagnant or even decreasing attendance? I'd say that's just as compelling an argument to influence and expedite an immediate need for a new arena.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saint Mary's has announced plans for a $13 million upgrade to its 3,500-seat arena to add 500 seats, video boards, suites and a performance center (weight room training, etc.).

The Gaels have been one of the most men's basketball programs despite the outdated facilities. They are tied for the 10th most wins in the nation since the start of the 2009-10 season.

Looks like the story omitted the word "successful" between "most" and "men's". I can't imagine that $13 million would transform McKeon Pavillion from its current status as a big gym into a modern arena.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about stagnant or even decreasing attendance? I'd say that's just as compelling an argument to influence and expedite an immediate need for a new arena.

Exactly.

The Canton-Akron Indians are the perfect local example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...