Lee Adams Posted November 16, 2015 Report Posted November 16, 2015 Nobody is expecting Akron to get selected over a name team. It's been discussed ad nauseam on here that it looks like there will be trouble filling all the bowl slots this year.Really? Quote
Lee Adams Posted November 16, 2015 Report Posted November 16, 2015 Meaningless? Going for win number 6 and a possible (I'd even call it likely) bowl bid on the line isn't meaningless.U would call it likely. The 6-6, 2004 team was more bowl attractive than this bunch. At least they had Charley. Ya your response is that there are even more meaningless bowls in 2015. But,don't assume that some of the teams in the 'better' conferences won't become eligible in the next 4 weeks. Win out,U go! Quote
LoyalZIP Posted November 17, 2015 Author Report Posted November 17, 2015 U would call it likely. The 6-6, 2004 team was more bowl attractive than this bunch. At least they had Charley. Ya your response is that there are even more meaningless bowls in 2015. But,don't assume that some of the teams in the 'better' conferences won't become eligible in the next 4 weeks. Win out,U go!Absolutely helpless. Attractiveness doesn't matter if there aren't enough eligible teams to go. I'm done discussing this. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.