Jump to content

Week 12 Recap: Title Tilt Set, But...


MACReport

Recommended Posts

We've posted our week 12 recap at MAC Report Online. --The teams have been set for the MAC Championship Game but they still have some work to do to ensure bowl eligibility, plus...--Breakdown of MAC's final out of conference record vs. other conferences and home and road non-conference record--Recaps of every game with notes and quotes--Offensive leaders--Players of the weekat: http://www.macreportonline.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone needs to go take a look at this web page. It should be titled DollarGeneralonLine.com. Two things stand out.First, there is a good chance that 4....maybe 5 teams of the 13 will finish the season with winning records (.500 or above). That's just plain bad.Second, if Miami loses to OU this week, they limp into the MACC with a 6-6 record. If they lose the MACC, they don't go bowling. Is there another conference out there where the runner up played itself out of a bowl by making it to the conference championship and then losing? Only in the MAC.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone needs to go take a look at this web page. It should be titled DollarGeneralonLine.com. Two things stand out.First, there is a good chance that 4....maybe 5 teams of the 13 will finish the season with winning records (.500 or above). That's just plain bad.Second, if Miami loses to OU this week, they limp into the MACC with a 6-6 record. If they lose the MACC, they don't go bowling. Is there another conference out there where the runner up played itself out of a bowl by making it to the conference championship and then losing? Only in the MAC.........
You're being a little hard on the MAC (although it is possible only one team will finish with an overall winning record - that would be bad). In general the MAC OOC schedules were not easy - would you rather have played our OOC or OSU's? And the MAC did at least get one signature scalp, WMU's upset of Iowa (at Iowa). Lets see, we beat WMU who beat Iowa who beat Illinois who beat OSU. We could have won the Big Ten if it wasn't for that sticky loss directly against OSU. :) At least the Sun Belt is worse than us, they have only one winning record and the potential for only two. The WAC has two very good teams, everyone else is mediocre. Conf USA has a couple good teams and not much else. All the non-BCS conferences struggle at some point.We're a part of it, we've never been more than mediocre in the conference. Even the year we won, we were only 5-3. I'm still hopeful, but 2005 raised our expectations quickly. I think that's good, but realistically we still are in about the same boat we were in when we joined the MAC. Next year and 2009 are going to be critical years to decide if we step up or step back.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone needs to go take a look at this web page. It should be titled DollarGeneralonLine.com. Two things stand out.First, there is a good chance that 4....maybe 5 teams of the 13 will finish the season with winning records (.500 or above). That's just plain bad.Second, if Miami loses to OU this week, they limp into the MACC with a 6-6 record. If they lose the MACC, they don't go bowling. Is there another conference out there where the runner up played itself out of a bowl by making it to the conference championship and then losing? Only in the MAC.........
You're being a little hard on the MAC (although it is possible only one team will finish with an overall winning record - that would be bad). In general the MAC OOC schedules were not easy - would you rather have played our OOC or OSU's? And the MAC did at least get one signature scalp, WMU's upset of Iowa (at Iowa). Lets see, we beat WMU who beat Iowa who beat Illinois who beat OSU. We could have won the Big Ten if it wasn't for that sticky loss directly against OSU. :) At least the Sun Belt is worse than us, they have only one winning record and the potential for only two. The WAC has two very good teams, everyone else is mediocre. Conf USA has a couple good teams and not much else. All the non-BCS conferences struggle at some point.We're a part of it, we've never been more than mediocre in the conference. Even the year we won, we were only 5-3. I'm still hopeful, but 2005 raised our expectations quickly. I think that's good, but realistically we still are in about the same boat we were in when we joined the MAC. Next year and 2009 are going to be critical years to decide if we step up or step back.
And for the first time that I can ever remember there are no MAC teams listed in ESPN's "Bottom 10".
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're being a little hard on the MAC (although it is possible only one team will finish with an overall winning record - that would be bad). In general the MAC OOC schedules were not easy - would you rather have played our OOC or OSU's? And the MAC did at least get one signature scalp, WMU's upset of Iowa (at Iowa). Lets see, we beat WMU who beat Iowa who beat Illinois who beat OSU. We could have won the Big Ten if it wasn't for that sticky loss directly against OSU. :)
A near perfect example of Faustian Logic. Nice work. :wave:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And for the first time that I can ever remember there are no MAC teams listed in ESPN's "Bottom 10".
and Notre Dame is... who'd a thunk it?
Sometimes they place a BCS team there as a joke. Like when Michigan lost to Appalachian State. Notre Dame really is one of the 10 worst teams in the nation.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...