Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/26/2026 in Posts

  1. Whys it perplexing? Because a couple random Internet strangers said a couple anonymous coaches didn't like it?
    2 points
  2. I don't believe the soccer playing conferences would not support this. The coaches recommended overwhelming approval of the two season concept. According to Jared the conferences that cared about soccer (BE, ACC, Sunbelt) were the ones driving this proposal. It is a complete joke that the cabinet sent the proposal back to the oversight committee to investigate the affect it would have on academics. Anyone who knew what D1 soccer players go thru in a season that has up to 3 games in 5 or 6 days would know the split in seasons with one game a week is far better for the players and their academics. If they cared about the athletes they would rush to this concept. Injuries would also be significantly reduced with more time for rest and time for treatment. I hope this concept is adopted.
    2 points
  3. We're not in a position to look down on anybody. It'd be nice to have a couple of these agreements with different mid major conferences. Give more good regular season games leading up to Cleveland.
    1 point
  4. I actually like the series TBH. I know some expressed they would prefer to pair with a different conference or have a multi-conference event, but that's not happening. At least not in the immediate future. The SunBelt and MAC are two relatively comparable conferences and in fact the SunBelt has more wins than the MAC in the series so we're not in a position to look down on them.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...