I feel all of this is true. I also feel Bettiol was probably the most skilled traditional center in the MAC. He both had the size and fundamentals to eat Miami alive in the low post. Miami didn't really have an answer for it. SMU had bigs, but they seemed much more raw offensively. They didn't have the same footwork or ability to finish near the rim that Bettiol did.
With Toppin out I don't feel their bigs are particularly skilled and they have plenty of warm bodies to run out there if 1 gets in foul trouble.
It's going to come down to limiting Atwell and Anderson. They seem very thin at guard as both only get a couple minutes of rest each game. If Anderson gets in foul trouble or aggravates his groin injury that would be a massive boost. He's more important to Texas Tech's offense (post Toppin) than Tavari is to ours.
I actually feel those metrics don't even fully show how 3-pt dependent they are. You have to remember JT Toppin was taking ~15 2-pt fgs per game. He's obviously no longer playing so I would imagine in the last 5-10 games their 3-pt attempts are even further up as much of those attempts got absorbed by their perimeter shooters, namely Atwell and Anderson.
Edit: Atwell in particular we have to run off the line. He averages 9.4 FGA per game. 8.5 of the are 3-pointers. I'm guessing the other .9 is him having his toe on the line /s.
I feel our defense improved considerably from earlier in the year. We were around ~#250 in defense per Kenpom when MAC play started. We currently stand at #114. If we played defense in November/December like we played in February/March we would have won those games. I feel inserting both Young and Halligan into the starting lineup played a part in that. They helped set the tone early defensively.
Edit: Look at opening play by Halligan against Kent as a prime example. Those are the plays that energize a team.
Steele out coached Enfield. Miami was always one step ahead in their adjustments offensively. SMU never was able to bully Miami on the inside outside of the first few minutes of each half.
They have some talent. Just don't seem well coached. They spent all of maybe 5 minutes this game feeding their bigs the ball in the low post, which allowed them to erase the half-time deficit. They then abandoned what worked.
Miami is baiting them into playing their style of play and it's working for Miami.
I'm not sure why SMU isn't attacking the basket more. Even on misses it would give them good opportunities to get offensive rebound put backs. I would expect them to make adjustments at the half. I feel Miami needs to build a cushion this first half.
Doubtful I'm going to this, but I thought I'd share if others were interested. I've never been here before so no idea how the TV setup or atmosphere is.
I don't think that's inconceivable. Miami struggled with big, skilled front court players all year. This game could potentially get ugly quick if they don't find a better way to defend the low post or rebound well.
Yes, I am aware. I made that post during the selection show when the matchup was first announced. One of the committee chairman came on later in the show to clarify.
I shared what 200+ men's basketball programs were spending yesterday. The women's data was hidden behind a pay wall, but someone provided it for me so thought I'd share. This would be for the 2024-2025 academic year.
Edit: It should be noted this figure doesn't include revenue sharing or 3rd party NIL.