zippy5

They were our two best recruiters. Stability would help with a brand new program

Our pitching coach left for Oakland too. I know of at least one player transferring out.. this isn't a great development

On the bright side I'm not sure if the talent in New Rochelle, NY is as enticing

our first recruiting battle against Rick Pitino?

This isn't good

That's the actual roster, not recruiting makeup

Right but we're way behind.

There is upside with 21 unfilled spots

Sweich was a pretty decent get for us when he committed IIRC

We're bad. But we also play a lot of bad teams.

I wanted to post this here being the likely most active topic

Do you think we could have gotten Arth to come for less money?

No one's forcing anyone to pay anyone that much money. That's what they determined they needed to pay to obtain that person's services. We can lower our salary and hire a D3 position coach but it might be ugly. Yeah, it's been ugly anyway ?

If college coaches were getting paid based on profits they bring in, most of them would be volunteers

Define over-inflated? They're paid according to what the market has dictated - perhaps the fees were needed to afford the coaches and not vice versa. I'd possibly argue that a D-1 job as a volleyball, track, wrestling, softball or similar sport is the pinnacle of their career path, there's no legitimate pro position. 200K for one of the top 100 jobs in the country in a field might not seem so outlandish when you look through that lens. In any case I'd argue something is worth whatever someone pays for it, to be concise.

That's dated 4/25

The prices now reflect market value. Your proposed salary is snatched out of thin air with no basis of reality behind them. Who would coach a MAC school for that much? 1-AA coaches make more. Just cut football at that point if we're going to nickel and dime that much.

Based on what?

*Looks up recruiting rankings and results* Yeah this checks out

So if the total active roster is 55, then they'll have 67 this year and 69 next year. Nice. I would still say 85 could be reduced a little, say to 80, but I'd probably be against going lower than that. 85 is 16-18 more than an NFL roster before redshirts, ineligibility issues, kids that get upset and transfer, etc. Plus these kids aren't getting paid to put their bodies on the line.

Well they have 65 including practice squad, they don't have redshirts for freshmen that aren't physically ready, and they can sign free agents to replace injured players.

They already denied the G5 petition to lower the number so I doubt a waiver would happen. Curious to see what they have to say. Cross Country was cut to a non scholarship sport so maybe they could get creative there somehow

I've seen a couple of the graphics guys I follow on twitter say they're moving onto other things. The guys that make the templates recruits tweet out on committing or visits and obviously more than that but.. I'm assuming support positions like that and who knows what else are casualties of this.