Really wouldn't change much from what I can tell.
East - Akron, Buffalo, Can't, Miami, Ohio, Temple, UMass
West - Ball State, BGSU, CMU, EMU, NIU, Toledo, WMU
In a North South allignment it would likely be:
North - NIU, WMU, CMU, EMU, Toledo, BGSU, Buffalo
South - Akron, Can't, Miami, Ball State, Ohio, Temple, UMass
So We would have Ball State and they would get Buffalo, Akron would then have its three rivals (Can't, Miami, and Ohio). If you look at the map, there isn't any other way to do a North South division.
My understanding is that FB division reconfiguration would be done such that Temple and UMass are NOT in the same division. Having them in the same division would double the excess travel burden for the other teams in the division.
Look for Temple & UMass to be in opposite divisions when it's all played out.
Go Zips!
I think you are correct. UMass and Temple must be in separate divisions for one other obvious reason. If they are the same divisions....then basketball and other sports would be split 7 in west and 5 in the east...unless you would reshuffle the alignment based on sport...highly unlikely. So...look for Temple to be in the south and UMass in the north.