Captain Kangaroo Posted December 17, 2019 Report Posted December 17, 2019 55 minutes ago, Zipmeister said: Dayton was #10 in this seasons first NET rankings. They are loaded with talent. That doesn't make them a "P5" team. I am sorry the committee has reviewed your post and find quotation marks unacceptable for moving a non P5 team to P5 status. Acceptable presentations would include the following: P5* P5-like P5 lite P5 ish * = not really So Colorado (PAC-12) is a "P5" team in hoops, and Gonzaga isn't? Quote
kreed5120 Posted December 17, 2019 Report Posted December 17, 2019 Boise State isn't considered a P5 in football, meanwhile, Rutgers and Kansas are. It has always been a measurement of what conference you're affiliated with, not the quality of the team. Quote
Captain Kangaroo Posted December 17, 2019 Report Posted December 17, 2019 Can we agree he’s a really good Group of 27 transfer? 2 Quote
Zipmeister Posted December 18, 2019 Report Posted December 18, 2019 3 hours ago, Captain Kangaroo said: So Colorado (PAC-12) is a "P5" team in hoops, and Gonzaga isn't? Correct! Colorado is a P5 team and Gonzaga is a P5ish team (see explanation below). 1 hour ago, Captain Kangaroo said: Can we agree he’s a really good Group of 27 transfer? Nope. really good understates his importance to the team. I believe I was the first one on this board to point out that he was going to be an incredible addition for the Zips. 4 hours ago, Zipmeister said: Dayton was #10 in this seasons first NET rankings. They are loaded with talent. That doesn't make them a "P5" team. I am sorry the committee has reviewed your post and find quotation marks unacceptable for moving a non P5 team to P5 status. Acceptable presentations would include the following: P5* P5-like P5 lite P5 ish * = not really Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.