Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Buffalo starting to get more second chance points now and still shooting well while the Lady Zips haven't scored in over three minutes of game time now. 

Shooting percentages right now

Overall
Akron - 8/24 - 33%
Buffalo - 11/25 - 44%

3 Pointers
Akron - 1/9 - 11%
Buffalo - 4/10 - 40%

That's the biggest glaring difference right now. If Buffalo starts getting more second chance points and points off turnovers prior to the half, this might be over if the Lady Zips don't start making some shots. 

Posted (edited)

Halftime

Buffalo 32
Akron 21

Stats at the half


Shooting Percentage
Overall
Akron - 28% (9/32)
Buffalo - 42% (13/31)

3 Point Shooting Percentage
Akron - 9% (1/11)
Buffalo - 40% (4/10)

Rebounds
Akron - 16 (7 offensive boards), 2 second chance points
Buffalo - 25 (9 offensive boards), 7 second chance points

Turnovers
Akron - 6 turnovers (8 points off Buffalo turnovers)
Buffalo - 9 turnovers (7 points off Akron turnovers)

Edited by mes102
Posted

We had the seven point run to cut it to 22-19.  Then got outscored 10-2. Buffalo too strong across the court.  Need a lot of #25 to keep it close!

Posted

Akron only scored two points in the last eight minutes of the 2nd quarter. Considering how Buffalo can light up the scoreboard, only being down 11 is encouraging. 

Have to believe Buffalo will be even better in the 2nd half. Lady Zips have to start hitting shots. That simple. I like where they're at compared to where it could be right now. 

Last time Ball State made it to the MAC Championship (after beating the top seed), the Lady Zips were in the other semifinal and outscored Central Michigan (similar style to this Buffalo team) by 16 in the second half to win that game. Lady Zips need a second half like that again to have any shot.  

Posted
7 minutes ago, mes102 said:

Akron only scored two points in the last eight minutes of the 2nd quarter. Considering how Buffalo can light up the scoreboard, only being down 11 is encouraging. 

Have to believe Buffalo will be even better in the 2nd half. Lady Zips have to start hitting shots. That simple. I like where they're at compared to where it could be right now. 

Last time Ball State made it to the MAC Championship (after beating the top seed), the Lady Zips were in the other semifinal and outscored Central Michigan (similar style to this Buffalo team) by 16 in the second half to win that game. Lady Zips need a second half like that again to have any shot.  

Can Rachel Tecca or Hanna Luburgh still get a COVID year? 😉

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, ewbrooman1 said:

Can Rachel Tecca or Hanna Luburgh still get a COVID year? 😉

Kacie Cassell was my favorite player from that class with how she had complete control of that offense. That group and how they played was fun to watch and hope more and more teams attempt to play like that.  

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Unfortunately, it's tough to see Buffalo squandering this lead. You're not going to beat anyone shooting 30%(overall) and 9%(from 3), let alone when your opponent is shooting 47%(overall) and 50%(from 3). WNIT would still be quite an accomplishment for this group. 

Edited by mes102
Posted (edited)

The scary part about this Buffalo team? Only Adeyeye and Hemphill are seniors. Fair, Camp, and Christie are juniors and Woolley is a freshman. They've had a nice recruiting pipeline in Australia for a number of years now. 

Edited by mes102
Posted
4 minutes ago, mes102 said:

Unfortunately, it's tough to see Buffalo squandering this lead. You're not going to beat anyone shooting 30%(overall) and 9%(from 3), let alone when your opponent is shooting 47%(overall) and 50%(from 3). WNIT would still be quite an accomplishment for this group. 

I think with 64 teams in the WNIT, it's strong possibility.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, ewbrooman1 said:

I think with 64 teams in the WNIT, it's strong possibility.

The MAC usually gets 3-4 teams in the WNIT in a normal season. 

Posted
Just now, Blue & Gold said:

Final score?


7:46 left in 4th quarter

Buffalo - 63
Akron - 39

Buffalo shooting 50% from the three-point line. Akron shooting 7% from the three-point line. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
Just now, kreed5120 said:

If you take out Dawson, Akron is shooting 9/39 (.231) from the field and 0-12 from 3. That's just not going to get it done. Dawson carried this team as far as she could.

One of the posts of the year.

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, kreed5120 said:

If you take out Dawson, Akron is shooting 9/39 (.231) from the field and 0-12 from 3. That's just not going to get it done. Dawson carried this team as far as she could.

I thought Bass did okay as the secondary scorer (4/8 overall, 0/0 from 3, 4/4 from FT), but had some costly turnovers in that first quarter. If you take Dawson and Bass out, the team is shooting 5/31(16.1%) and 0-12 from 3. Woolley from Buffalo was just bigger for Buffalo than Bass was for Akron. 

Edited by mes102

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...