I don't know her at all, but someone that was a Fed Reserve President would be amazing and a logical trade-off for the academic pedigree.
And not to crack open discussions of the past, didn't it get determined that Proenza's "financial mess" amounted to really about a 3% correction to the annual budget. There was not a massive financial issue. UA's debt to budget ratio is on the high side, but sustainable-- if enrollment stays steady-- and reflected the need to correct several decades of chronic underfunding of physical plant. Did UA need an on campus replacement for the Rubber Bowl? Yes, or exit football. Did UA need a total campus makeover? Yes, but it needed to finance itself since the state wouldn't. Those were necessary investments, not profligate spending. I don't go on campus today and feel like it is crazily over-built. It's not a bunch of crazy architectural over-reach...it's nice, but pretty utilitarian. It was established a while ago that the "financial mess" narrative was really just a Reichstag fire strategy to implement an ill-considered, ham-fisted, half-baked strategy/experiment.
If enrollment is now cratering, then there would now be a true financial mess...