UA1996MAENG

Akron against the world!

That Pioneer Conference (or additional non-scholarship conferences of that type) might be the future for many G5 programs. There seems to be at least a few G5 teams in each conference that "chose the wrong time" to be terrible, to the point where NIL and the Portal make a recovery extremely difficult if not impossible: Kent, most of Conference USA, half of the Sunbelt, etc.

Maybe UA admin really does not care because....the program is going to be cut or relegated back to FCS anyway? Was it somewhere on this site that there was a some info that one (urban) MAC university petioned to remain a conference member without football? Is the end of some sort coming after this upcoming season?

I've tried to read up on how the APR is caluculated in regard to the score for each year (not the averaging of three). In this environment, in which thousands of athletes transfer each year, and UA specifically turns over 30-40% of its roster each season, how the hell do they calulate any kind of graduation rate? Or is the score based more on the grades (GPAs) of athletes for that academic year?

Even in this anarchy of so-called college football, I don't think an athlete can just fail classes at one university and transfer to another and be eligible to play. Or maybe I'm wrong. Who knows anymore.

One way or the other, the axe of reality is going to fall on most of the G5. The money just isn't there, and even some of the rich programs are sacrificing the Olympic sports to prop up football, which, let's be honest, even at Toledo few really care about it. Front-loading entire athletic departments toward football and basketball while cutting other sports is eventually going to invoke some interpretation of Title IX or spur the advent of new legislation to protect scholarships and opportunities for students who actually go to classes, pass classes, and graduate instead of smoking dope in the elevators of the Exchange Street Residence Hall (Sorry to vent but I had enough of that when I was moving my kid into his dorm room). At this point, as a loyal UA alumnus, I just don't give a damn about football anymore if it's going to be a money-draining, losing embarrassment. Joe must go.

UA Men's and Women's XC pulling in the 1000!!!

It seems very likely that this is about UA; Toledo is succesful in football, and Buffalo is in no real finaical danger with the largest enrollment in the MAC. I think we'll see a lot of these situations (dropping football outright or dropping down a division) over the next five years. Sadly, the money is just not available to run a D1 program even on the G5 level. It might be the lesser of two evils to bow out instead of enduring years of very visible and costly failure in a system rigged for the success of larger and wealthier universities. College football as it is today cares only about the Power Conferences, and even within the "Power 4" there are/will be a large number of rich "also-rans". Northwestern is as far away from Ohio State as Kent is to, let's say, even mediocre Cincinnati.

I'm not sure that you can blame UA for ruining Quaker Square. QS was already a wasteland a decade or more before UA bought it.

It's a good thing UA has parted ways with this facility; the next burden to get rid of is old Central Hower HS.

A sad result of a state, regional and national problem: our culture is producing fewer and fewer high school graduates willing and capable of pursuing difficult fields of study in engineering and science. This hasn't manifested itself yet on the campuses of "flagship" universities like Ohio State or nationally and globally recognized universities like Stanford or MIT; however, the problem is serious for our national economy. I am not a UA insider, but I suppose part of the problem is that UA simply has limited resources to promote this fine program nationally and globally.

I am tuned out of the playoffs specifically, and uninterested in this so-called college football generally. The sport has always been equal measures of corruption (academic fraud, etc.) and the “haves vs. the have-nots". Today it's markedly worse. Rich universities like Ohio State can now buy championships outright while 75% of D1 teams get poached in the portal, having to rebuild every year. I don't see how this can continue. I am a UA fan to the end, but what kind of sports world are we living in now, specifically in the G5? It seems like a hopeless task no matter who the coach is. If you're on the bottom in this circumstance it's far too likely that the bottom is where you remain without NIL money, which UA and the rest of the MAC does not have. It's now one year and out for 20-40% of your "varsity". How could any coach build a team like this? No time to develop, no time to build. It's just bailing out water from a sinking ship or putting on a new roof and then you find out your foundation just collapsed.

Today I see more activity, but the overhwleling majority of it is outgoing. UA looks like it lost 20+ and signed 2-3? This page indicates more signees than that, right?

Where can we view an updated transfer portal? I have been looking at 24/7 Sports since last year, and I'm now confused. Yesterday the 2025 Portal for UA showed two outgoing transfers and no incoming. ?

Oh, Lou..... The current era in CFB is undesirable and disappointing in many ways, but Holtz can't/shouldn't romanticize the past either. It was never clean and never about academics no matter how we choose to remember it. Teamwork and character? Booster payments, academic fraud, racking up hundreds of victories in a century against teams that were either helpless or underfunded. So what's really changed?

I'm not shocked. UA has almost 400 million in debt, mostly for infrastructure investment over the last 20 years. We're about to reduce faculty, again, because enrollment is about 50% of what it was at its peak. I'm not sure where the additional money for football in particular and athletics in general is supposed to come from.

With Title-IX, cuts could only be in men's sports. What goes? Baseball and cross country were brought back recently. If enrollment and athletic revenues do not improve, it'll be football to be cut eventually.

Why? I do not pay much attetion to NIU's other sports. Are they a drag on basketball, etc.?

NIU is really leaving to be a football-only member of the Mountain West? What would NIU do with the rest of its sports? It can't remain in the MAC without football, can it? https://www.si.com/college-football/northern-illinois-weighing-offer-join-mountain-west?utm_medium=pushly_notifications&utm_source=pushly_notifications&utm_campaign=5919717

In regard to a NIL collective - yes! However, I'm sorry to flog a dead horse, but in the end what did the donation of the upgraded scoreboard do to improve or stabilize football in particular and UA athletics in general? Whoever donated it, thanks....but did it really do any good? Imagine what just that million+ dollars could have done in Zippy's NIL fund. If it meant 6+ wins I'd gladly sit on splintered wood seats with no scoreboard at all. I'd take randon beatings about the head between warm beers to see a winning team. If we are in this NIL era, which indeed is crap, then UA has to play it to survive.

I hope he finds some replacements in the portal. It just seems like the team is running in sand having practically to rebuild from scratch each year.

See the portal when it updates this week. The UA list is long. Not a portal issue, but still bad: the class Moorehead just signed is small and underwhelming - last in the MAC, 121st overall.

Yes, exactly. I simply do not see where the money will come from that would be sufficent just to "exist". With the Power4 moving toward a model in which they play more and more conference games (certainly a requirement of ESPN and the other media entities), each MAC athletic department will see a loss of 2, 3 million or more dollars a year. I'm not sure where they make that loss up.

Not techncally, but it is the flagship university in the state, which is de facto protection from the circumstances that the "regular folk" experience.

KSU enrollment was up this fall, and has been pretty good overall (the all-campus decline is a larger issue that affects many of our public universities). What is our (UA) debt, almost 400 million? (operating deficits and infrastructure investment). Overall, I'm on the side of all of our public universities, except Ohio State, which neither needs nor solicits my support, though I was a graduate student there as well. Kent and Akron both did not get the development and operating support in the 1970s and 1980s when they really needed it. In the current circumstances, KSU and Akron (and 100s of others across the country) are trying to compete with enormous, historically well funded land-grant universities like Ohio State and Michigan and Penn State. Our "mid-majors" can't compete with very powerful athletics marketing and infrastructure that was put in place a century ago, so they tried and are trying to compete by offering more academic programs and better on-campus facilities (half of UA’s campus and the new engineering building at KSU come to mind). I can't condemn Kent or UA (Proenza, mostly) for making the effort to expand and improve these universities.