UAZipster0305

This ranking is skewed big time towards the P5 schools. Realtimerpi is objective and has us at 59, which I think is representative of the season so far.

I think we tried that once. #TeamOhio Seriously though, I have no problem with Indians/Cavs/Browns highlights or access at the Info. Anything that can be done to make UA games unifying events for the community should be done....except #TeamOhio...that was desparate and pathetic. Highlights celebrating UA football and athletics tradition, history, and success should be copiously provided as well.

How do you figure?

Unless the game notes released by UA are incorrect, there's no excuse for this. Why bother writing anything if it's gonna be wrong?

I watched part of the App St game last night, and the halftime show previewed the top-25 games for this week. When it came to our game, the thing they highlighted most was our 0-23 record against ranked opponents. This obviously neglects our win over Marshall at the Rubber Bowl. Anyone think they got this misinformation from our own local media?

Anyone remember the last time we beat WMU? 38-37 in 2007...I recall listening to Frenchy going nuts on the radio about a kick return. I believe it was very late and was the go-ahead score. Such a thrilling win would be very timely for the home crowd and the progrum.

This is great; however, how many of these people are casual fans? I am concerned that if we get blown out, they will be turned off for years to come. I believe we can win this game although a 2-3 TD victory for WMU is not out of the question given their quality, which the casual fan has no appreciation.

It's been a while since I've posted...particularly busy in the real-world for the past six months...however, I had to check-in... Is this real? We are 4-2 coming off a bowl win and having beaten Kent in dramatic fashion...now we host (in our own beautiful glass and brick on-campus stadium) a top-25 team (that has beaten two B1G teams already this season and is undefeated) for the right to remain at the top of the MAC! I must be dreaming. Those of you thinking we should save our best players for the rest of the MAC schedule are out of your minds.

Congrats to Reggie, Jake, and Pat on solid careers.

Yeah, we may have won at home. However, we have to win a big game that is not at home before any of these injustices regarding RPI are valid.

It has nothing to do with a cavernous arena either. It is not having composure because we have not played any big games all year until the end of the season. Build a real OOC schedule.

No more bitching about deserving to be a bubble team ever again. Either win the MACC or win some other post-season games first. I am tired of all the MAC Conference success followed by not much. It is emotionally exhausting. Big players make big plays in big games. Big teams find a way to win when not playing their best in big games.

No composure.

Pissing down our leg. Here is exactly where playing a tougher OOC schedule would help us. We can't expect to out shoot every opponent we play.

If we had only hit one of the front-ends of those one-and-ones.

We need a good final push. We are looking a little lost on the last few offensive possessions.

Splash!!! Reggie for 3 plus 1 coming!

At least the commentators said that was terrible. I'd expect nothing less from OSU officiating. At least they threw the ball back to us.

This is gonna be tight to the wire. I hope we have some magic left. Would be a great time for McAdams to get hot.

Cheatum is playing great. Tough rebounding, good defense, and wise choices not to shoot on offense.

Not a great way to close it out, but I will take another half like that! Solid defense.

Here we go!

Agreed regarding the other games, especially the high mid-majors. I'll add to that list: LSU, Tennessee, Illinois, Missouri, Minnesota, Clemson, and South Carolina. Mid-major-wise, I'd like to see Dayton or Xavier too.

There has been a lot of discussion about playing higher profile OOC opponents on the road early in the season. I thought I'd start a new thread to address this. Who do you want to see us play? Why? My considerations: name brand of program, appeal to recruits, possibility of a big win, payday, national exposure, post-season resume building, and interesting travel weekend for Zips fans in the fall if the game is on a weekend. I'll start: Pitt, Cincy, Indiana, Maryland, Georgetown, WVU, OSU, Duke, UNC, Kentucky, and Louisville. We should be playing 2-3 of these teams EVERY year!

As someone else mentioned, the NIT is a private, for-profit event. We either accept what we are given or don't participate. Simple as that. Yes, match-ups and interest ($) were used to justify the seeds...it wasn't done based on resume strength. Who cares?...We have a terrific opportunity anyhow. Beat OSWho and Florida this year and maybe we have a chance to host a mid-tier B1G team in future years. As a fan, contribute by listening to the radio, watching on TV, reading associated articles, and creating a social media buzz...attention is what the NIT cares about. I have to say, meager crowds at the JAR for games other than OU and Kent really hurt our prospects for getting a home game like this. It may have been awarded to us if we had a loyal and rapid fan base large enough to fill the JAR and make a great atmosphere for TV. As it is, it will be given to the larger (though underwhelmed with opportunity) school.