@interferenceif the ball is thrown behind the receiver, or underthrown, or in other words, if the receiver has to go back through the defender to get the ball, then I think interference might be ambiguous. If the receiver had turned around without stopping and the defender makes contact before the ball, then there is no ambiguity at all.I wanna see a replay again, because I wasn't really thinking much about interference at the time... I was more focused on the fact that they called it incomplete. But I am just wondering if the Ref felt that Bowser stopped in a way that didn't give the defender a chance to stop as well.