You're right. 3 teams in the top 10 with 2 traditional powers being way down and it's over.
I am sure Nebraska will only add to the the downfall. After all, adding another traditionally top 20 team with a lot of history and tradition will only further the downfall.
Since you know how the rest of the county thinks of the B10, I think the B10 should just disband and the teams should all join either the MAC, WAC or be independents. Possibly join the Big East or ACC. All of those conferences are obviously superior to the B10.
That being said, the names do suck.
Answer these questions:
1)How many times has the Big Ten had a winning bowl record in the last 7 years?
2)How many victories do the big 3 (Wisky, OSU, MSU) of the Big Ten have vs current top 25 teams other than each other?
3)What is the entirety of the Big Ten's record vs current top 25 teams (not including eachother)?
Read the answers below, or research yourself, and tell me the Big Ten isn't overrated simply because it's the Big Ten. Now I'll admit, I'm one of the biggest Buckeye haters out there, but the numbers don't lie. The media is so far up the Big Ten schools butts that they don't realize their playing style has become obsolete except vs each other.
That being said, a friend of mine summed it up perfect when I asked him what he thought of the new division names: "It's because, 'Going to Lose in the Sugar Bowl,' and 'Going to Lose in the Rose Bowl' wouldn't fit on the trophies."
Answers if you don't feel like looking it up....
A1) ONCE...last year (4-3). Previous 6 years? 15-28 (.349)
A2) ZERO
A3) 0-2 (Alabama over Penn State, Missouri over Illinois)