Jump to content

ksu sucks

Members
  • Posts

    1,141
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by ksu sucks

  1. Sure Dambrot has no clue what he's doing with our big men and couldn't draw up a smart play if his life depended on it

    I'm interested to see if you stick to that statement tomorrow morning once your emotions have calmed.

  2. Some of you that think we are bad at being little brother to OS U should read the posts over there.

    Exactly. I thought about this a while ago and I came to the same conclusion. Ohio fans seem to be the most insecure bunch in the MAC, and this has to be why. In their defense, it's probably annoying when you travel outside of Ohio and tell someone you went to school at Ohio and the response is Oh, so you're a buckeye!

    Most of the posters there are old farts. They think it's still 1976 and Akron is still Hilltop High. Times are a changin' and they can't handle it.

  3. There are probably 8k there. Certainly respectable for a Sunday night. They had over 13k earlier this year and over 10k as well.

    I'm sure the crowd looks good. It just seems stupid having such a large arena if you can't fill it regurlarly. I can't imagine those 13K games come around very often.

    Not like it matters. What's happening on the court is all that matters. And right now, Ohio has nothing to be disappointed about.

  4. Just checked out Ohio's forums.

    Turns out Dambrot hates OU and it goes back thirty years ago to his days as an assistant under Bob Rupert(!). Dambrot hated those high and mighty Bobkittens because they wouldn't stoop to our level and schedule us. Oh, and Dambrot doesn't actually hate Ohio. He just says things like that to random reporters to get a dig at Can't. He's just evil like that.

    Yeah, pretty interesting stuff... :rolleyes:

  5. @k s u sucks, never give up on presenting new ideas, no matter how negative the responses might seem. It's important for all aspects of any situation to be brought forward and considered, and those presenting one side should not be discouraged by those presenting the other. It's always possible that something could be done. But unless someone gets the ball rolling as you did, the possibilities tend not to be explored.

    Thanks for the encouragement, DIG. I'm not so much giving up on my idea, as much as I am on my ability to convince a few of you. As you mentioned, it really doesn't matter if I convince you. I know the Athletic department reads this stuff. If one of Wistricill's minions takes my idea and tries to take credit for it(by all means, please do) then the response I receive on this forum is irrelevant. ;)

  6. I've see the student section for those December games. Is two students considered a "section?"

    Do 90% of the season ticket holders go out of town for the month of December?

    The Zips students really haven't done anything to merit getting center court seats at the JAR. And giving the boot to people/companies paying $500/seat, on top of their ticket costs, is something even Wistercil would never consider.

    No disagreement there. Student attendance has been weak, especially if the number of students in the floor seats is your gauge for overall student attendance. But I wonder how many students are spread out amongst the general admission crowd? I wonder how many of the students who sit in the GA seating are typically in the student section at the Info(that is, until Ianello sucked the life out of the FB program)?

    The Athletic department should crunch the numbers for this. Something like a ratio of the number of students on the floor vs the number of students in attendance. If there is a disparity there, what's causing it? Hmm...

    The JAR is what it is. Mary Kay and Revlon combined don't have enough lipstick to slater on our 1980's era pig to make it presentable. Oh well...at least what transpires on the court itself is top-shelf quality.

    Amen to that.

    I'm just looking for a short-term fix. If there would be this much resistance to the idea, forget it. It just seems like the University is missing out on a prime chance to convert some of it's OSU-crazed students. But what do I know, anyway...

  7. @k s u sucks, my point was that the folks who pay for the lower level chairbacks pay a pretty stiff premium in exchange for sitting close to the court and having the best view in the house. I don't think "most" or even many of them would be willing to continue paying the same high premium price for less premium seats.

    So if your plan is to clear a bunch of them out to make room for students, the plan should also include an offset to make up for the reduced income the basketball team would generate by virtue of fewer people willing to pay a premium price for less desirable seats.

    Dave, I understood your point.

    You probably know more about the seating situation than I do. I've spent all of my time up in the bleacher seats, bending over to see the scoreboard from behind the rafters. :D So perhaps I'm too far away to get a feel for the mindset of those with the best seats in the house. How many of them are season ticket holders? I hope not many, because seating down there can be pretty sparse for those December blizzard matches against the little sisters of the poor.

    At any rate, I wonder how many of those premium paying zips supporters would consider relocating to a different section of the lower chairback area if it meant giving a better student experience and a better game time atmosphere? We're not talking about giving up an entire side of the lower reserves and pushing everyone else to bleachers. Let's just give a few rows of seats to the students, as Taxpayer suggested. I'd be rather surprised to hear many zips supporters reject to such an idea.

    This team is too good to force the students to sit in makeshift bleachers on opposite ends of the court. Next season will be huge(as is this season). This team deserves better.

    And to reemphasize my earlier point about short term appeasement: If the university wants to continue seeing sub-3,000 attendance numbers for the next twenty years, then they should continue their current set-up. If they want long-term attendance increases, they're going to need to work on the game time experience for the students. Happy students make happy alumni.

    I understand the restrictions that the JAR imposes, and if these suggestions are economically infeasible because of that, so be it. I just hope the U is working on a solution. This program, these fans, and Dambrot deserve better.

  8. Wadszip, awesome post.

    Another factor that I think your post suggested, but didn't mention specifically, is the willingness of the administration to spend money on athletics. In that category, Akron beats just about everyone in the MAC. Also, that may be another reason BG and K-ent will be left out of any expansion. I'm not entirely sure about BG's president, but Lester Lefton seems very reluctant when it comes to athletics. It seems like he has delusions of grandeur when it comes to academics. He spent some time as VP at Tulane and thinks he can turn a state school in Ohio into some kind of Northeastern academic elite. :rolleyes: OTOH, Proenza seems to understand how athletics can elevate a university.

    But enough Can't bashing. Great post!

  9. Unfortunately, I don't see any modifications for the remainder of the 2011-2012 season.

    No, of course not. But as you mentioned, it would be nice to see some changes in the upcoming season(s).

    I'm sure most of the season ticket holders in the lower chairbacks would consider moving their seat if it results in a better atmosphere for the students and the players. The athletic department should consider simply sending a questionnaire to current and potential season ticket holders. Would they be willing to make a sacrifice to help enhance the atmosphere at the JAR? It's not like there isn't enough room for a scaled down version of Michigan's student section. Give a small section of the lower chairbacks to the students and get rid of the random seating behind the basket(unless needed?). I'm willing to bet that most of the fans would be willing to accommodate such a change.

    Also, I purposely used the word "modification". If a short-term fix such as the one above isn't possible, there's always the possibility of structural changes in the JAR. Knock down the track and expand seating behind both the hoops, similar to this.

    Whatever the case, I'm sure the university is checking into all options. I hope something happens soon. This program has so much momentum. I hope a new arena comes around in at least less than ten years!

    BTW, if Dambrot is still around when it's built, we ought to consider naming the place after him. :champs:

  10. It took 2 wins in 24 games to get to the point where we can even debate that. Football is king - with students and the general population

    I know. I'm just messing with you.

    But to get back to my original question, I'm willing to bet that if there were a more unified student section at the JAR, we would see something similar to what we had with the Rubber Bowl. Unfortunately, the JAR just isn't going to allow for that without massive modification.

    I really wish they would give a section of the chair back seating to the students. Half of those people never show up anyway. I like Michigan's set up:

    Much better than watching a bunch of old farts sit on their hands. :zzz:

×
×
  • Create New...