Awe, you really do care, and appreciate having me around on this forum! I'll take your criticism under advisement. Though I believe you're a bit unfair to Balsy circa 2012 as he was a much more timid, Akron undergrad just looking for an outlet for Zips fandom that really didn't exist, and rarely made posts that pushed the envelope even slightly.
Of course there were issues, no one is denying that! Recruiting still sucked (but was better than before), offensive play calling was a mystery after 2013...among other issues for which I probably am not aware of...but there is a level of nuance there that Bowden's detractors don't want to talk about.
Predictable, sure. Bowden had a 1-11 first year. But beyond the simple prediction you have to have something tangible. Simply saying "all coaches struggle their first year" is a whitewash excuse. Bowden may have been 1-11 that first year, but there was a tangible improvement that could be seen that wasn't subjective: competitive late in games almost winning (FIU, BGSU, Miami that year...including a surprisingly competitive game against Tennessee) and overall defensive and Offensive statistical improvement. What are we seeing with Arth that is tangible, right now?