Well... I am not sure who you are arguing for, the NCAA being a curse to non-BCS programs or ESPN being a curse to BCS programs, but Ill elaborate on both.
The current NCAA model is a curse to non-BCS programs because they don't have a fair shot to win the championship before a game is even played. Think about it, is there any other collegiate sport where a mid-major has no shot to win the championship?
As for ESPN being a curse to BCS programs (note: this doesnt include Akron)- is that ESPN has a bias to the SEC that is unfair to everybody else in the BCS, which creates an unfair advantage (in my eyes anyways). Yes, with the SEC's success, it makes sense from a business standpoint to do this. However, as ESPN basically being a monopoly, I think it is their duty report impartially and not lobby for the SEC. Not to mention, the SEC has teams (not all) ranked highly every year at the beginning, and undeservedly so (see Arkansas last year) because of what the top teams do. The SEC is a very top heavy league. In fact, the bottom 8 teams went 0-30 against the top 6 teams in the conference in 2012.
Im curious as to how many AP voters have any sort of affiliation at all with ESPN....