Contributions you have made to numerous soccer forums are respected and appreciated.
I do not intend to be condescending or pedantic. I only wish to communicate.
NCAA must become more like FIFA rather than less.
If NCAA soccer wishes to remain relevant to the US Soccer Big Picture, they must adopt FIFA rules.
Those rules include draws being scored for one point.
In a tournament setting, one side must advance (obviously).
The time honored, if odious, method to determine who advances is PKs.
The advancing side gains only the one point for the draw, because match was not decided during play.
RPI is an American departure from FIFA rules, but FIFA has similar mechanisms to seed tournaments.
A neutral site draw is not worth as much as a neutral site win. Not in old fashioned FIFA scoring. Not in RPI.
While the overall RPI changed during that same time, the relationship between Indiana and Wisconsin did NOT change after their match last week in BiG Final.
In relation to each other, how these two sides were before the match remained unchanged after the match.
Nothing was decided in that draw. RPI did not tilt one way or another.
I seems to me that you are advocating weighting RPI differently, awarding a greater bonus to teams that advance via PKs.
That is a worthy discussion.
But bear in mind that the more you mess with the bonus' and penalties in RPI, the further from FIFA tournament scoring we get.
I fervently believe that making NCAA soccer (almost) exactly like FIFA soccer is the only way collegiate soccer will increase its influence.
No side should move up in ranking (or seeding) by advancing via PKs.
Someone had to be BiG Tourney Champ.
Had Wisconsin won the BiG Final, they would have been seeded higher.
But that did not happen. It was a draw.