Captain Kangaroo Posted April 23, 2015 Report Posted April 23, 2015 Boring topic, but the guy seemed to spend a lot of time on it so I'll post the link Quote
Zipgrad01 Posted April 23, 2015 Report Posted April 23, 2015 Nice to see that we are still considered a guaranteed "w". Quote
Hilltopper Posted April 23, 2015 Report Posted April 23, 2015 What do Canadians know about football anyhow. Quote
Dr Z Posted April 23, 2015 Report Posted April 23, 2015 What do Canadians know about football anyhow.I'll ask the Lemonator this summer. Boring topic, but the guy seemed to spend a lot of time on it so I'll post the linkInteresting thought. I like the names of the divisions. Quote
K92 Posted April 23, 2015 Report Posted April 23, 2015 Boring topic, but the guy seemed to spend a lot of time on it so I'll post the link Quote
Captain Kangaroo Posted April 23, 2015 Author Report Posted April 23, 2015 I like that there would be 4 teams that could claim they won a MAC championship. The Josten's midwest regional salesman would quadruple his sales. Quote
UAZippers Posted April 23, 2015 Report Posted April 23, 2015 That format is an interesting idea, but I am not at all a fan of teams playing each other twice in the regular season. The single game format for rivals is what I like most about college football. If you lose to your rival, you have to sit through a whole year before you can get another shot at them. It makes the games have even more of a meaning. Quote
Lee Adams Posted April 23, 2015 Report Posted April 23, 2015 What do Canadians know about football anyhow.Ask Jabbari Arthur. Quote
zen Posted April 24, 2015 Report Posted April 24, 2015 Why stop at four divisions?Ohio River DivisionOhioMiamiWestern Reserve DivisionAkronCan'tMaumee DivisionBGToledoOntario DivisionBuffaloEastern MichiganSouth Shore DivisionWestern MichiganNorthern IllinoisBoonie DivisionBall StateCentral MichiganNow you can schedule your rival 4 times! Quote
Balsy Posted April 24, 2015 Report Posted April 24, 2015 This format would only work IMO if it was somehow attached to a "playoff system" for the MAC Championship. Every team only plays each other once, but overall record is taken into consideration for each division."East" victors play off against each other, "West" victors play off against each other. Winners play each other in the Championship. I almost like that idea in the sense that there'd almost have to be 1 flex game at the end of the season that would be determiend after the season has happened, and the last games of the year, and those "rivalry" games do have that much more meaning. But this is a very boring topic, because it's never going to happen. Unfortunately we're in that awful off-season time. Quote
zippy5 Posted April 24, 2015 Report Posted April 24, 2015 3 team divisions is the second dumbest idea I've heard in a long time, with the winner being playing teams twice in CFB. Quote
ZippyRulz Posted April 24, 2015 Report Posted April 24, 2015 More divisional trophies is good, but really, shouldn't every team get a trophy for participating and trying real hard? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.