Jump to content

Game 12—Golden Flashes @ Zips


zippy5

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, zipsoutsider said:

IMHO, it's pretty difficult to make a real assessment based on one game. Woodson had a 72% completion rate at Buffalo.

 

But has had trouble with the deep ball all season.  Has shown to get rust when sitting out, and Kato has improved.  IMO, ride the hot hand.  But IDK, this is all assuming Woodson is even back in the first place.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Balsy said:

 

But has had trouble with the deep ball all season.  Has shown to get rust when sitting out, and Kato has improved.  IMO, ride the hot hand.  But IDK, this is all assuming Woodson is even back in the first place.  

I honestly think there are legitimate reasons for starting either. I just think it's premature to get too hyped up about Kato, yet. Against Buffalo, Woodson had  41 and 36 yard completions.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, zipsoutsider said:

I honestly think there are legitimate reasons for starting either. I just think it's premature to get too hyped up about Kato, yet. Against Buffalo, Woodson had  41 and 36 yard completions.

 

True.  I guess we Zips fans are just so desperate to win we're almost becoming browns fans with our QBs...:lol:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, checked the last 2 game notes and, predictably, #4 was listed as number one QB while #1 was listed as second string for both those games as well.

I say predictably as there is no reason for the staff to bother updating this as a tip of their hand as to who may or may not start.

 

Earlier this week I thought TB would start #4 given his comments in the presser about "if it's a 2 game suspension, that's the punishment" but the more I think about it, the more I don't think they can go away from the hot hand at QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, CDMac said:

Yeah, checked the last 2 game notes and, predictably, #4 was listed as number one QB while #1 was listed as second string for both those games as well.

I say predictably as there is no reason for the staff to bother updating this as a tip of their hand as to who may or may not start.

 

Earlier this week I thought TB would start #4 given his comments in the presser about "if it's a 2 game suspension, that's the punishment" but the more I think about it, the more I don't think they can go away from the hot hand at QB.

There is an old cliche in sports that “you don’t lose your job to injury” yet many jobs are lost to injury when the replacement is an upgrade.  I’m not aware of any sports cliche that says “you don’t lose your job to suspension”.  Let’s hope Terry has his thinking cap on here.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...