Blue & Gold Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago Only one game into the season & we're already so cranky 🤣😭😭😭 1 2 Quote
kreed5120 Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 53 minutes ago, Blue & Gold said: Only one game into the season & we're already so cranky 🤣😭😭😭 It's 20 years of built up frustration. Everyone has a boiling point. 1 Quote
Spin Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 12 hours ago, kreed5120 said: I’m actually on the same page with most of this and have expressed similar thoughts myself. One program I think might make sense to keep at both schools however is nursing, given the existing shortages in the field. That issue is only likely to grow as the boomer generation continues to age, requiring more healthcare, while they will also be also leaving the workforce. It would be more the engineering, business, liberal arts, etc that I think would make the most sense to divide. Allow each school to plow as much resources into what they're best at. This way we can offer a higher quality education in our region. There will still be plenty of competition as we will be competing with other states and private campuses. Nursing remains the greatest need in the professional careers. That’s certainly true in NE Ohio and facilities want BSN’s. A lot of experienced nurses are taking their BSN’s and going into management. Or becoming nurse practitioners. That leaves holes in direct patient care. Quote
dre22era Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 6 hours ago, ZipCat said: Boise State does not make a profit. Of their annual revenue: -$3,700,000 comes from student fees. -$12,000,000 comes from school funds. Men Lie Women Lie My Numbers and References Don't You sound about as dumb and naive as a UA Board of Trustee Member Quote
dre22era Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 6 hours ago, ZipCat said: And you apparently don't think past a headline, and misrepresent what other people are saying. If your program is receiving money from student fees, your program is a net negative. Period. Fullstop. If your program is receiving non-football donation or other school funds, your program is a net negative. Guess what? Akron Football has a Revenue of $30,000,000! Must be good right!? Except $20,000,000 comes from non-football other school funds, which is in most-part a student-fee that's not designated for football, but mostly goes to football. Boise State Football receives $15,000,000 of subsidy to break-even. All while it's cutting programs slashing budgets elsewhere on campus. It's an eff'n joke. You could cut the program tomorrow and it'd be a net positive windfall for Boise State. Stick to doing your own taxes Quote
exit322 Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 21 hours ago, dre22era said: Yeh give us apparel we can buy from the team shop to support our own damn team Now you're speaking crazy talk 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.